Too Much Finance: Evidence of Pure Negative Effects on Growth

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Manchester School Pub Date : 2026-10-09 Epub Date: 2026-07-09 DOI:10.1111/manc.70058
Alex Cobham, David Cobham, Miroslav Palanský
{"title":"Too Much Finance: Evidence of Pure Negative Effects on Growth","authors":"Alex Cobham,&nbsp;David Cobham,&nbsp;Miroslav Palanský","doi":"10.1111/manc.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper takes the ‘Too much finance’ (TMF) literature further by focussing on data for value added in financial services. This broad measure has been much less used in the literature than total private or bank credit, on the one hand, or stock market capitalisation or activity, on the other. We investigate whether those data are consistent with the standard TMF result, and we consider various alternative measures of financial activity including domestic production, domestic consumption and exports and imports. We also use two stratifications of the data, OECD versus non-OECD and the World Bank's income categories, to see if the relevant relationships differ clearly between different groups, and examine whether results are affected by curtailing the sample to exclude the global financial crisis that began in 2008. We confirm the core TMF result for private credit, including for many stratified groups and regardless of the inclusion of the crisis and later years. However, the findings for value added of the financial sector are less consistent, with more support for a purely negative, linear association with growth. This finding is also echoed for some measures of the international trade in financial services. While the provision of private credit appears to strengthen the economy until a tipping point is reached, the expansion of much other financial sector activity may simply be detrimental. We suggest the need for further research to develop understanding of the impact of growth in different elements of the financial sector, in order to support granular policy prioritisation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47546,"journal":{"name":"Manchester School","volume":"94 6","pages":"688-703"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manchester School","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/manc.70058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper takes the ‘Too much finance’ (TMF) literature further by focussing on data for value added in financial services. This broad measure has been much less used in the literature than total private or bank credit, on the one hand, or stock market capitalisation or activity, on the other. We investigate whether those data are consistent with the standard TMF result, and we consider various alternative measures of financial activity including domestic production, domestic consumption and exports and imports. We also use two stratifications of the data, OECD versus non-OECD and the World Bank's income categories, to see if the relevant relationships differ clearly between different groups, and examine whether results are affected by curtailing the sample to exclude the global financial crisis that began in 2008. We confirm the core TMF result for private credit, including for many stratified groups and regardless of the inclusion of the crisis and later years. However, the findings for value added of the financial sector are less consistent, with more support for a purely negative, linear association with growth. This finding is also echoed for some measures of the international trade in financial services. While the provision of private credit appears to strengthen the economy until a tipping point is reached, the expansion of much other financial sector activity may simply be detrimental. We suggest the need for further research to develop understanding of the impact of growth in different elements of the financial sector, in order to support granular policy prioritisation.

过度融资:对经济增长纯粹负面影响的证据
本文通过关注金融服务中增加值的数据,进一步研究了“过度金融”(TMF)文献。在文献中,与私人或银行信贷总额,或股票市值或股票活动相比,这一广义指标的使用要少得多。我们调查了这些数据是否与标准TMF结果一致,并考虑了各种金融活动的替代指标,包括国内生产、国内消费和进出口。我们还使用了两种数据分层,经合组织与非经合组织以及世界银行的收入类别,以查看不同群体之间的相关关系是否有明显差异,并检查减少样本以排除2008年开始的全球金融危机是否会影响结果。我们确认针对私人信贷的核心货币流动性基金结果,包括针对许多分层群体的结果,无论是否包括危机及其后年份。然而,金融部门增加值的调查结果不太一致,更多地支持与增长的纯粹负线性关联。这一发现也适用于国际金融服务贸易的一些指标。尽管在达到临界点之前,提供私人信贷似乎会加强经济,但许多其他金融部门活动的扩张可能只是有害的。我们建议有必要进一步研究,以加深对金融部门不同要素增长影响的理解,以支持细化的政策优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manchester School
Manchester School ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Manchester School was first published more than seventy years ago and has become a distinguished, internationally recognised, general economics journal. The Manchester School publishes high-quality research covering all areas of the economics discipline, although the editors particularly encourage original contributions, or authoritative surveys, in the fields of microeconomics (including industrial organisation and game theory), macroeconomics, econometrics (both theory and applied) and labour economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书