Modeling Carbon Emissions Driven by Land-Use Change: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Global Vegetation Models

IF 6.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jianyong Dong, Shuting Zhao, Ximing Chen, Zhangcai Yin, Akihiko Ito
{"title":"Modeling Carbon Emissions Driven by Land-Use Change: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Global Vegetation Models","authors":"Jianyong Dong,&nbsp;Shuting Zhao,&nbsp;Ximing Chen,&nbsp;Zhangcai Yin,&nbsp;Akihiko Ito","doi":"10.1029/2026GB009219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a key component of the climate system, terrestrial carbon dynamics are commonly simulated using Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), which provide essential information for estimating the global carbon budget. However, substantial uncertainties persist in DGVM-based estimates of land-use change carbon emissions, and their process-level origins remain poorly constrained. Here, we harmonize DGVM-based net land-use emissions (E<sub>NLUC</sub>) from 23 TRENDY2025 DGVMs using a transient, time-varying PFT-level land-cover correction that explicitly removes the loss of additional sink capacity (LASC), and apply a hierarchical Bayesian mixed-effects variance decomposition framework to characterize between-DGVM heterogeneity in fitted coefficients associated with land-use predictors. LASC correction reveals that uncorrected DGVMs artificially converge toward bookkeeping estimates, masking persistent structural deficiencies—most notably the limited representation of wood harvest, forest management, and other peat-related activities incorporated in bookkeeping models. Between-DGVM heterogeneity in fitted coefficients is greater for persistent regrowth area than for current deforestation, particularly at decadal-to-centennial timescales and in the tropics, where the fitted association with persistent regrowth area varies substantially among models. This uncertainty can propagate into residual land sink estimates, complicating the diagnosis of land–atmosphere carbon exchange. Our results highlight that improving the representation of secondary forest recovery, including sub-grid land-use processes and forest management, is critical for reducing uncertainties in land-use and land-use change emissions in next-generation DGVMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"40 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2026GB009219","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2026GB009219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a key component of the climate system, terrestrial carbon dynamics are commonly simulated using Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), which provide essential information for estimating the global carbon budget. However, substantial uncertainties persist in DGVM-based estimates of land-use change carbon emissions, and their process-level origins remain poorly constrained. Here, we harmonize DGVM-based net land-use emissions (ENLUC) from 23 TRENDY2025 DGVMs using a transient, time-varying PFT-level land-cover correction that explicitly removes the loss of additional sink capacity (LASC), and apply a hierarchical Bayesian mixed-effects variance decomposition framework to characterize between-DGVM heterogeneity in fitted coefficients associated with land-use predictors. LASC correction reveals that uncorrected DGVMs artificially converge toward bookkeeping estimates, masking persistent structural deficiencies—most notably the limited representation of wood harvest, forest management, and other peat-related activities incorporated in bookkeeping models. Between-DGVM heterogeneity in fitted coefficients is greater for persistent regrowth area than for current deforestation, particularly at decadal-to-centennial timescales and in the tropics, where the fitted association with persistent regrowth area varies substantially among models. This uncertainty can propagate into residual land sink estimates, complicating the diagnosis of land–atmosphere carbon exchange. Our results highlight that improving the representation of secondary forest recovery, including sub-grid land-use processes and forest management, is critical for reducing uncertainties in land-use and land-use change emissions in next-generation DGVMs.

土地利用变化驱动的碳排放模型:全球动态植被模型的不确定性和敏感性分析
作为气候系统的重要组成部分,陆地碳的动态变化通常通过全球植被动态模型(dgvm)进行模拟,为估算全球碳收支提供了重要信息。然而,基于dgvm的土地利用变化碳排放估算仍然存在很大的不确定性,其过程层面的来源仍然缺乏约束。在这里,我们使用瞬态时变pft水平的土地覆盖校正来协调来自23个TRENDY2025 dgvm的基于dgvm的净土地利用排放量(ENLUC),该校正明确地消除了额外汇容量(LASC)的损失,并应用分层贝叶斯混合效应方差分解框架来表征dgvm之间与土地利用预测因子相关的拟合系数的异质性。LASC修正表明,未修正的dgvm人为地向簿记估计收敛,掩盖了持续的结构性缺陷——最明显的是木材采伐、森林管理和其他与泥炭有关的活动纳入簿记模型的有限代表性。与当前的森林砍伐相比,持续再生面积拟合系数的dgvm间异质性更大,特别是在十年至百年的时间尺度上和热带地区,在热带地区,与持续再生面积的拟合关联在不同的模式之间差异很大。这种不确定性可以传播到剩余土地汇估算中,使陆地-大气碳交换的诊断复杂化。我们的研究结果强调,改善次生林恢复的代表性,包括子网格土地利用过程和森林管理,对于减少下一代dgvm中土地利用和土地利用变化排放的不确定性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书