Semantic Perception of Color Schemes Across Contrasting Semi-Public Study Environments

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Serra Koz, Nilgün Olguntürk
{"title":"Semantic Perception of Color Schemes Across Contrasting Semi-Public Study Environments","authors":"Serra Koz,&nbsp;Nilgün Olguntürk","doi":"10.1002/col.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although color schemes are widely acknowledged as a crucial element of interior design, less is known about how they influence the semantic perception of interior spaces. This study examined the effects of various color schemes on semantic assessments in two contrasting semi-public study spaces: libraries and cafés. Four color scheme types (monochromatic, analogous, complementary, and split-complementary) were applied to 16 digitally produced interior stimuli in a within-subjects experimental design. A 25-item semantic differential scale was used by 40 individuals to assess each stimulus. Five semantic dimensions <i>(Orderliness, Environmental Calmness, Stylistic Modernity, Spatiality, and Environmental Openness)</i> were found by exploratory factor analysis. Interior typology significantly affected all five dimensions, while linear mixed-effects models also showed significant color-scheme effects across all five semantic dimensions. Post hoc comparisons further indicated that the pattern of these effects differed across semantic dimensions. No significant Color Scheme × Typology interactions were observed across the five semantic dimensions, suggesting that the effects of color scheme were broadly consistent across the two typologies. The results indicate that both color scheme and interior typology contribute to environmental meaning, while color-scheme effects were broadly consistent across the two typologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10459,"journal":{"name":"Color Research and Application","volume":"51 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/col.70133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Color Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/col.70133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although color schemes are widely acknowledged as a crucial element of interior design, less is known about how they influence the semantic perception of interior spaces. This study examined the effects of various color schemes on semantic assessments in two contrasting semi-public study spaces: libraries and cafés. Four color scheme types (monochromatic, analogous, complementary, and split-complementary) were applied to 16 digitally produced interior stimuli in a within-subjects experimental design. A 25-item semantic differential scale was used by 40 individuals to assess each stimulus. Five semantic dimensions (Orderliness, Environmental Calmness, Stylistic Modernity, Spatiality, and Environmental Openness) were found by exploratory factor analysis. Interior typology significantly affected all five dimensions, while linear mixed-effects models also showed significant color-scheme effects across all five semantic dimensions. Post hoc comparisons further indicated that the pattern of these effects differed across semantic dimensions. No significant Color Scheme × Typology interactions were observed across the five semantic dimensions, suggesting that the effects of color scheme were broadly consistent across the two typologies. The results indicate that both color scheme and interior typology contribute to environmental meaning, while color-scheme effects were broadly consistent across the two typologies.

对比半公开学习环境中配色方案的语义感知
虽然配色方案被广泛认为是室内设计的关键元素,但人们对它们如何影响室内空间的语义感知却知之甚少。本研究在两个不同的半公共学习空间:图书馆和咖啡厅中考察了不同的配色方案对语义评估的影响。四种配色方案类型(单色,类似,互补和分裂互补)应用于16个数字产生的内部刺激在受试者内部实验设计。40名受试者采用25项语义差异量表评估每个刺激。通过探索性因子分析,发现了五个语义维度(有序性、环境冷静性、风格现代性、空间性和环境开放性)。内部类型显著影响所有五个维度,而线性混合效应模型在所有五个语义维度上也显示出显著的配色方案效应。事后比较进一步表明,这些影响的模式在语义维度上有所不同。在五个语义维度上,没有观察到显着的配色方案与类型学的相互作用,这表明配色方案的影响在两种类型学中大致一致。结果表明,配色方案和室内类型都有助于环境意义,而配色方案的效果在两种类型中大致一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Color Research and Application
Color Research and Application 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Color Research and Application provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed research reviews, original research articles, and editorials of the highest quality on the science, technology, and application of color in multiple disciplines. Due to the highly interdisciplinary influence of color, the readership of the journal is similarly widespread and includes those in business, art, design, education, as well as various industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书