Behavioral Responses of Pyrethroid-Susceptible and Pyrethroid-Resistant Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to Transfluthrin and Metofluthrin in High-Throughput Screening System Assays

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Dae-Yun Kim
{"title":"Behavioral Responses of Pyrethroid-Susceptible and Pyrethroid-Resistant Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to Transfluthrin and Metofluthrin in High-Throughput Screening System Assays","authors":"Dae-Yun Kim","doi":"10.1111/1748-5967.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Dengue and other arboviruses remain major public health concerns, with <i>Aedes aegypti</i> as the primary vector. Pyrethroid resistance has reduced the effectiveness of conventional insecticides, prompting interest in volatile pyrethroid spatial repellents (VPSRs) such as transfluthrin (TFT) and metofluthrin (MFT). These compounds modify behavior by deterring host contact or inducing escape. Using the high-throughput screening system, evaluated behavioral responses of pyrethroid-susceptible (USDA) and pyrethroid-resistant (Pu-Teuy) <i>Ae. aegypti</i> to VPSRs via contact irritancy (CIA) and spatial repellency (SRA) assays, referencing baseline toxicity (TOX) data. Resistant mosquitoes exhibited significantly lower knockdown (KD) and mortality (MT) than susceptible counterparts under contact exposure (CIA KD at LC<sub>50</sub>: USDA 43.3% ± 18.6% vs. Pu-Teuy 0.0% ± 0.0%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Transfluthrin retained partial efficacy, eliciting contact escape responses up to 65.0% ± 17.6% in USDA (at LC<sub>99</sub>) and 71.7% ± 14.7% in Pu-Teuy (at LC<sub>75</sub>). At discriminating concentrations (DCs), MFT elicited stronger contact escape than TFT in resistant mosquitoes (50.0% ± 6.3% vs. 33.3% ± 15.1%) but produced lower contact toxicity (5.0% ± 5.5% vs. 55.0% ± 18.7% MT). In SRA, TFT produced stronger noncontact deterrence, yielding Spatial Activity Index values of 0.69 (USDA) and 0.51 (Pu-Teuy), compared to 0.31 (USDA) and 0.22 (Pu-Teuy) for MFT. Integration of TOX, CIA, and SRA revealed marked divergence between lethal and behavioral endpoints. Compound-specific behavioral profiles TFT as a noncontact spatial deterrent and MFT as a contact excito-irritant support their tailored deployment as the “push” component in multimodal “push-pull” vector management strategies combining spatial repellents with baited traps.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11776,"journal":{"name":"Entomological Research","volume":"56 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entomological Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-5967.70150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dengue and other arboviruses remain major public health concerns, with Aedes aegypti as the primary vector. Pyrethroid resistance has reduced the effectiveness of conventional insecticides, prompting interest in volatile pyrethroid spatial repellents (VPSRs) such as transfluthrin (TFT) and metofluthrin (MFT). These compounds modify behavior by deterring host contact or inducing escape. Using the high-throughput screening system, evaluated behavioral responses of pyrethroid-susceptible (USDA) and pyrethroid-resistant (Pu-Teuy) Ae. aegypti to VPSRs via contact irritancy (CIA) and spatial repellency (SRA) assays, referencing baseline toxicity (TOX) data. Resistant mosquitoes exhibited significantly lower knockdown (KD) and mortality (MT) than susceptible counterparts under contact exposure (CIA KD at LC50: USDA 43.3% ± 18.6% vs. Pu-Teuy 0.0% ± 0.0%; p < 0.05). Transfluthrin retained partial efficacy, eliciting contact escape responses up to 65.0% ± 17.6% in USDA (at LC99) and 71.7% ± 14.7% in Pu-Teuy (at LC75). At discriminating concentrations (DCs), MFT elicited stronger contact escape than TFT in resistant mosquitoes (50.0% ± 6.3% vs. 33.3% ± 15.1%) but produced lower contact toxicity (5.0% ± 5.5% vs. 55.0% ± 18.7% MT). In SRA, TFT produced stronger noncontact deterrence, yielding Spatial Activity Index values of 0.69 (USDA) and 0.51 (Pu-Teuy), compared to 0.31 (USDA) and 0.22 (Pu-Teuy) for MFT. Integration of TOX, CIA, and SRA revealed marked divergence between lethal and behavioral endpoints. Compound-specific behavioral profiles TFT as a noncontact spatial deterrent and MFT as a contact excito-irritant support their tailored deployment as the “push” component in multimodal “push-pull” vector management strategies combining spatial repellents with baited traps.

高通量筛选系统分析拟除虫菊酯敏感和抗性埃及伊蚊(双翅目:库蚊科)对氯氟菊酯和甲氟菊酯的行为反应
登革热和其他虫媒病毒仍然是主要的公共卫生问题,埃及伊蚊是主要媒介。对拟除虫菊酯的抗药性降低了传统杀虫剂的有效性,促使人们对挥发性拟除虫菊酯空间驱避剂(vpsr)产生兴趣,如跨氟菊酯(TFT)和甲氟菊酯(MFT)。这些化合物通过阻止宿主接触或诱导逃逸来改变行为。采用高通量筛选系统,对拟除虫菊酯敏感(USDA)和抗性(Pu-Teuy)伊蚊的行为反应进行了评价。参考基线毒性(TOX)数据,通过接触刺激(CIA)和空间驱避(SRA)测定埃及伊蚊对vpsr的影响。在接触暴露下,抗性蚊子的击倒率(KD)和死亡率(MT)显著低于易感蚊子(CIA KD: USDA 43.3%±18.6% vs Pu-Teuy 0.0%±0.0%;p < 0.05)。氟氯菊酯在USDA (LC99)和Pu-Teuy (LC75)的接触逃避率分别为65.0%±17.6%和71.7%±14.7%。在不同浓度(DCs)下,MFT对抗性蚊子的接触逃逸率高于TFT(50.0%±6.3%比33.3%±15.1%),但接触毒性较低(5.0%±5.5%比55.0%±18.7% MT)。在SRA中,TFT产生了更强的非接触威慑,其空间活动指数为0.69 (USDA)和0.51 (Pu-Teuy),而MFT的空间活动指数为0.31 (USDA)和0.22 (Pu-Teuy)。TOX、CIA和SRA的整合显示了致命终点和行为终点之间的显著差异。化合物的特定行为特征:TFT作为一种非接触的空间威慑,MFT作为一种接触的兴奋刺激,支持它们作为多模式“推挽”矢量管理策略的“推动”组件,将空间驱避剂与诱饵陷阱结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Entomological Research is the successor of the Korean Journal of Entomology. Published by the Entomological Society of Korea (ESK) since 1970, it is the official English language journal of ESK, and publishes original research articles dealing with any aspect of entomology. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: -systematics- ecology- physiology- biochemistry- pest control- embryology- genetics- cell and molecular biology- medical entomology- apiculture and sericulture. The Journal publishes research papers and invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书