Superiority-Probabilistic-Based Products Ranking Method: Integrating Users' Consensus Experiences and Consumers' Individual Preferences

IF 3.4 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Expert Systems Pub Date : 2026-10-04 DOI:10.1111/exsy.70443
Wenlong Cui, Weiwei Li, Pingtao Yi
{"title":"Superiority-Probabilistic-Based Products Ranking Method: Integrating Users' Consensus Experiences and Consumers' Individual Preferences","authors":"Wenlong Cui,&nbsp;Weiwei Li,&nbsp;Pingtao Yi","doi":"10.1111/exsy.70443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the information edge, online reviews have emerged as a pivotal factor in consumers' purchasing decisions. In reality, we are accustomed to obtaining rigid product rankings from online reviews. However, online reviews naturally contain varied and sometimes conflicting viewpoints; the rigid ranking results are not completely reasonable. To address this problem, the paper proposes a superiority-probabilistic-based ranking model by integrating both users' consensus experiences and consumers' individual preferences. Firstly, the users' experiences, primarily represented by star ratings and textual reviews, are transformed into the individual evaluation domains (IEDs) through sentiment analysis. Then, the IEDs are further fused into the comprehensive evaluation domain (CED) by highlighting the users' consensus experiences. Subsequently, an individual-preference-oriented indicator weighting method is introduced by referring to the sequential relationship analysis (SRA) method. Based on the above preparations, the superiority-probability-based pairwise comparison matrix (SPM) is calculated through a thorough sampling of CED and the iterative aggregation of it with the indicator weights. The SPM reflects the relative superiority probability among any products, from which the probabilistic ranking of products can be derived. The case study illustrates the validity and practicability of the proposed methods. The research contribution establishes a superiority-probabilistic-based products ranking framework, providing consumers with more detailed purchase recommendations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51053,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems","volume":"43 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.70443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the information edge, online reviews have emerged as a pivotal factor in consumers' purchasing decisions. In reality, we are accustomed to obtaining rigid product rankings from online reviews. However, online reviews naturally contain varied and sometimes conflicting viewpoints; the rigid ranking results are not completely reasonable. To address this problem, the paper proposes a superiority-probabilistic-based ranking model by integrating both users' consensus experiences and consumers' individual preferences. Firstly, the users' experiences, primarily represented by star ratings and textual reviews, are transformed into the individual evaluation domains (IEDs) through sentiment analysis. Then, the IEDs are further fused into the comprehensive evaluation domain (CED) by highlighting the users' consensus experiences. Subsequently, an individual-preference-oriented indicator weighting method is introduced by referring to the sequential relationship analysis (SRA) method. Based on the above preparations, the superiority-probability-based pairwise comparison matrix (SPM) is calculated through a thorough sampling of CED and the iterative aggregation of it with the indicator weights. The SPM reflects the relative superiority probability among any products, from which the probabilistic ranking of products can be derived. The case study illustrates the validity and practicability of the proposed methods. The research contribution establishes a superiority-probabilistic-based products ranking framework, providing consumers with more detailed purchase recommendations.

基于优势-概率的产品排序方法:整合用户共识体验和消费者个人偏好
在信息边缘,在线评论已经成为消费者购买决策的关键因素。在现实中,我们习惯于从在线评论中获得严格的产品排名。然而,在线评论自然包含各种各样的观点,有时甚至是相互矛盾的观点;僵化的排名结果并不完全合理。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种结合用户共识经验和消费者个人偏好的基于优势概率的排序模型。首先,通过情感分析,将以星级评价和文本评论为主要代表的用户体验转化为个人评价域(ied)。然后,通过突出用户的共识经验,将ied进一步融合到综合评价领域(CED)。随后,借鉴序列关系分析(SRA)方法,提出了一种面向个体偏好的指标加权方法。在上述准备的基础上,通过对CED进行彻底抽样,并将其与指标权重进行迭代聚合,计算出基于优势概率的成对比较矩阵(SPM)。SPM反映了任何产品之间的相对优势概率,由此可以推导出产品的概率排序。实例分析表明了所提方法的有效性和实用性。研究贡献建立了一个基于优势概率的产品排序框架,为消费者提供更详细的购买建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems
Expert Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
266
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems: The Journal of Knowledge Engineering publishes papers dealing with all aspects of knowledge engineering, including individual methods and techniques in knowledge acquisition and representation, and their application in the construction of systems – including expert systems – based thereon. Detailed scientific evaluation is an essential part of any paper. As well as traditional application areas, such as Software and Requirements Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Artificial Intelligence, we are aiming at the new and growing markets for these technologies, such as Business, Economy, Market Research, and Medical and Health Care. The shift towards this new focus will be marked by a series of special issues covering hot and emergent topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书