{"title":"From Empowerment to Ethical Blind Spots: A Dual-Value Pathway to Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior via Task Value and Self-Worth","authors":"Yiran Li, Soohyun Lee, Suyeon Lee, Hyesun Kang","doi":"10.1002/cjas.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examined the impact of empowering leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) through the mediating roles of perceived task value and perceived self-worth at work, and the moderating roles of work identification and organizational identification. Data were collected from 400 employees in South Korea. Partial least squares structural equation modeling indicated that empowering leadership positively influenced both perceived task value and perceived self-worth at work. Although perceived task value suppressed UPB, perceived self-worth at work increased UPB. Mediation tests showed that empowering leadership exerted two opposing indirect effects on UPB—a suppressive effect through perceived task value and a facilitative effect through perceived self-worth at work—revealing a dual mechanism: empowerment can serve as a protective factor by enhancing perceived task value, yet be a risk factor by elevating perceived self-worth at work. A supplementary analysis further suggested a small sequential pathway from perceived task value to perceived self-worth at work. Moderated mediation analyses demonstrated that work identification strengthened the negative link between perceived task value and UPB, whereas organizational identification amplified the positive link between perceived self-worth at work and UPB. These findings suggest that empowering leadership has ambivalent effects, shaping UPB through distinct value-related pathways depending on employees' identification targets.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.70087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined the impact of empowering leadership on unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) through the mediating roles of perceived task value and perceived self-worth at work, and the moderating roles of work identification and organizational identification. Data were collected from 400 employees in South Korea. Partial least squares structural equation modeling indicated that empowering leadership positively influenced both perceived task value and perceived self-worth at work. Although perceived task value suppressed UPB, perceived self-worth at work increased UPB. Mediation tests showed that empowering leadership exerted two opposing indirect effects on UPB—a suppressive effect through perceived task value and a facilitative effect through perceived self-worth at work—revealing a dual mechanism: empowerment can serve as a protective factor by enhancing perceived task value, yet be a risk factor by elevating perceived self-worth at work. A supplementary analysis further suggested a small sequential pathway from perceived task value to perceived self-worth at work. Moderated mediation analyses demonstrated that work identification strengthened the negative link between perceived task value and UPB, whereas organizational identification amplified the positive link between perceived self-worth at work and UPB. These findings suggest that empowering leadership has ambivalent effects, shaping UPB through distinct value-related pathways depending on employees' identification targets.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.