Marie Dorn, Christine Ferng, Kerensa Klottrup-Rees, Kenneth Lee, Martina Micheletti
{"title":"Improved clone selection by combining a manufacturability index with semi-perfusion scale-down screening systems","authors":"Marie Dorn, Christine Ferng, Kerensa Klottrup-Rees, Kenneth Lee, Martina Micheletti","doi":"10.1016/j.crbiot.2026.100423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Early stage cell clone screening is critical for identifying highly performing candidates in biopharmaceutical development. In this study, clone screening was carried out through miniaturisation of a semi-perfusion methodology from 24-well microwell plates (MWP) to 96-well deepwell plates (DWP). Traditional clone selection methods often rely on single-parameter metrics such as cell-specific productivity (q<sub>P</sub>), which may not fully capture clone performance, particularly across different scales and culture formats. We evaluated a multi-parameter approach using the manufacturability index (MI<sub>CL</sub>) to rank clones in the 96-well DWP format and compared the results with previously published data from the 24-well MWP system. The MI<sub>CL</sub> integrates growth, viability, productivity, and metabolic parameters, providing a more comprehensive assessment than q<sub>P</sub> alone. Our results demonstrate that MI<sub>CL</sub> rankings offer improved robustness and greater consistency across scales compared to single-parameter q<sub>P</sub> rankings. Notably, despite a reduced parameter set in the 96-well DWP due to volume constraints, MI<sub>CL</sub>-based rankings aligned well with those from the more parameter-rich 24-well MWP system. These findings highlight the advantages of multi-parameter evaluation in early clone selection and underscore the limitations of relying solely on productivity metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52676,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Biotechnology","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100423"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590262826000596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early stage cell clone screening is critical for identifying highly performing candidates in biopharmaceutical development. In this study, clone screening was carried out through miniaturisation of a semi-perfusion methodology from 24-well microwell plates (MWP) to 96-well deepwell plates (DWP). Traditional clone selection methods often rely on single-parameter metrics such as cell-specific productivity (qP), which may not fully capture clone performance, particularly across different scales and culture formats. We evaluated a multi-parameter approach using the manufacturability index (MICL) to rank clones in the 96-well DWP format and compared the results with previously published data from the 24-well MWP system. The MICL integrates growth, viability, productivity, and metabolic parameters, providing a more comprehensive assessment than qP alone. Our results demonstrate that MICL rankings offer improved robustness and greater consistency across scales compared to single-parameter qP rankings. Notably, despite a reduced parameter set in the 96-well DWP due to volume constraints, MICL-based rankings aligned well with those from the more parameter-rich 24-well MWP system. These findings highlight the advantages of multi-parameter evaluation in early clone selection and underscore the limitations of relying solely on productivity metrics.
期刊介绍:
Current Research in Biotechnology (CRBIOT) is a new primary research, gold open access journal from Elsevier. CRBIOT publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications (including viewpoints and perspectives) resulting from research in biotechnology and biotech-associated disciplines.
Current Research in Biotechnology is a peer-reviewed gold open access (OA) journal and upon acceptance all articles are permanently and freely available. It is a companion to the highly regarded review journal Current Opinion in Biotechnology (2018 CiteScore 8.450) and is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals. All CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy-of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach-to ensure they are a widely read resource that is integral to scientists' workflow.