Comparative accuracy of imaging modalities for differentiating malignant small testicular masses

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yajat Dua, Anusha Maheshwari, Marlon Perera, Declan Murphy, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Niranjan Sathianathen
{"title":"Comparative accuracy of imaging modalities for differentiating malignant small testicular masses","authors":"Yajat Dua, Anusha Maheshwari, Marlon Perera, Declan Murphy, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Niranjan Sathianathen","doi":"10.1111/bju.70492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To synthesise evidence comparing the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in differentiating malignant from benign small testicular masses. Patients and Methods A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA)‐compliant search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science databases up to 6 May 2026 identified 11 studies comprising 707 patients with small testicular masses (predominantly <2 cm) who underwent imaging prior to a histopathological or, where unavailable, a mixed clinical/radiological follow‐up reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy measures for six modalities (brightness‐mode [B‐Mode] ultrasonography [US], colour doppler US [CDUS], contrast‐enhanced US [CEUS], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], strain elastography [SE] and strain ratio [SR]) were synthesised using a Bayesian bivariate hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. Results The CEUS demonstrated the most reliable discriminatory ability with a pooled sensitivity of 91% and pooled specificity of 81%, yielding the highest diagnostic odds ratio of 46. B‐Mode US remains a valid screening test with the highest sensitivity of 96% but a specificity of only 39%. CDUS showed a pooled sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 81%. MRI had a pooled sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 38%. SE demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 56%. Finally, SR reported the lowest sensitivity at 74% and a specificity of 50%. CEUS demonstrated significantly higher specificity than B‐Mode US (ratio 1.9, 95% posterior interval [PI] 1.2–4.4) and MRI (ratio 1.8, 95% PI 1.0–5.2). Conclusion The CEUS demonstrates the highest combined sensitivity and specificity for differentiating benign from malignant testicular masses, significantly outperforming conventional B‐Mode US and MRI in specificity. CEUS represents a compelling decision‐making tool to support testis‐sparing strategies and reduce unnecessary orchidectomies for indeterminate small testicular masses.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To synthesise evidence comparing the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in differentiating malignant from benign small testicular masses. Patients and Methods A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA)‐compliant search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science databases up to 6 May 2026 identified 11 studies comprising 707 patients with small testicular masses (predominantly <2 cm) who underwent imaging prior to a histopathological or, where unavailable, a mixed clinical/radiological follow‐up reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy measures for six modalities (brightness‐mode [B‐Mode] ultrasonography [US], colour doppler US [CDUS], contrast‐enhanced US [CEUS], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], strain elastography [SE] and strain ratio [SR]) were synthesised using a Bayesian bivariate hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. Results The CEUS demonstrated the most reliable discriminatory ability with a pooled sensitivity of 91% and pooled specificity of 81%, yielding the highest diagnostic odds ratio of 46. B‐Mode US remains a valid screening test with the highest sensitivity of 96% but a specificity of only 39%. CDUS showed a pooled sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 81%. MRI had a pooled sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 38%. SE demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 56%. Finally, SR reported the lowest sensitivity at 74% and a specificity of 50%. CEUS demonstrated significantly higher specificity than B‐Mode US (ratio 1.9, 95% posterior interval [PI] 1.2–4.4) and MRI (ratio 1.8, 95% PI 1.0–5.2). Conclusion The CEUS demonstrates the highest combined sensitivity and specificity for differentiating benign from malignant testicular masses, significantly outperforming conventional B‐Mode US and MRI in specificity. CEUS represents a compelling decision‐making tool to support testis‐sparing strategies and reduce unnecessary orchidectomies for indeterminate small testicular masses.
鉴别恶性睾丸小肿块的影像学比较准确性
目的比较不同影像方式对睾丸小肿块良恶性鉴别的诊断价值。截至2026年5月6日,PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库中符合PRISMA标准的首选报告项目确定了11项研究,包括707名患有小睾丸肿块(主要为2cm)的患者,这些患者在组织病理学检查之前接受了影像学检查,或者在无法获得临床/放射学混合随访参考标准的情况下接受了影像学检查。使用贝叶斯二元分层汇总接收器工作特征模型,对六种模式(亮度模式[B - mode]超声[US]、彩色多普勒超声[CDUS]、对比度增强超声[CEUS]、磁共振成像[MRI]、应变弹性成像[SE]和应变比[SR])的诊断准确性测量进行了综合。结果超声造影显示出最可靠的鉴别能力,合并敏感性为91%,合并特异性为81%,诊断优势比最高为46。B‐Mode US仍然是一种有效的筛选试验,灵敏度最高为96%,但特异性仅为39%。CDUS的总敏感性为69%,特异性为81%。MRI的总敏感性为91%,特异性为38%。SE的总敏感性为87%,特异性为56%。最后,SR报告的最低敏感性为74%,特异性为50%。超声造影的特异性明显高于B‐Mode US(比值1.9,95%后验间隔[PI] 1.2-4.4)和MRI(比值1.8,95%后验间隔[PI] 1.0-5.2)。结论超声造影在鉴别睾丸肿块良恶性方面具有最高的敏感性和特异性,在特异性上明显优于常规B - Mode US和MRI。超声造影是一种令人信服的决策工具,可以支持保留睾丸的策略,减少对不确定的小睾丸肿块进行不必要的睾丸切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书