Implementation of ultrasound surveillance following negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in early oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.8
Tiam Sahraie, Emily Alexander, Sipho Simon Nhongo, James Morrison, Martin Paley, Arshad Siddiqui, Thomas Handley
{"title":"Implementation of ultrasound surveillance following negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in early oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tiam Sahraie, Emily Alexander, Sipho Simon Nhongo, James Morrison, Martin Paley, Arshad Siddiqui, Thomas Handley","doi":"10.1007/s10006-026-01650-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Management of the clinically node-negative neck in T1/T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is controversial. While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can highlight patients that require selective neck dissection (SND); its false-negative rate necessitates post-operative surveillance to detect missed cervical lymph node metastases (CLNM) and allow for salvage surgery. Ultrasound (US) in conjunction with clinical examination is commonly employed for this observation; however, the optimal regimen is unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate follow-up surveillance after negative SLNB in patients with T1/T2 OSCC at our centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were identified over eight years. Nine (15.5%) had a positive SLNB and underwent further treatment. In the remaining 49 patients, data was collected on US utilisation, timing, and outcome events. The primary outcome was CLNM identified by US examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 US examinations were performed. The median time to first US was 7 months (range 2-48; n = 29), second 16.5 months (range 8-50; n = 14), third 26 months (range 14-65; n = 7) and fourth 26 months (n = 1), demonstrating considerable deviation from the local protocol. No CLNM was identified by US surveillance following negative SLNB. Three patients (3/49, 6.1%) had events during follow-up. Two developed metachronous primary tumours and one developed multiple synchronous tumours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US surveillance following SLNB is variably implemented at our centre. These findings highlight the need for better defined and evidence-based protocols in this patient cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-026-01650-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Management of the clinically node-negative neck in T1/T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is controversial. While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can highlight patients that require selective neck dissection (SND); its false-negative rate necessitates post-operative surveillance to detect missed cervical lymph node metastases (CLNM) and allow for salvage surgery. Ultrasound (US) in conjunction with clinical examination is commonly employed for this observation; however, the optimal regimen is unclear. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate follow-up surveillance after negative SLNB in patients with T1/T2 OSCC at our centre.

Methods: Fifty-eight patients were identified over eight years. Nine (15.5%) had a positive SLNB and underwent further treatment. In the remaining 49 patients, data was collected on US utilisation, timing, and outcome events. The primary outcome was CLNM identified by US examination.

Results: A total of 51 US examinations were performed. The median time to first US was 7 months (range 2-48; n = 29), second 16.5 months (range 8-50; n = 14), third 26 months (range 14-65; n = 7) and fourth 26 months (n = 1), demonstrating considerable deviation from the local protocol. No CLNM was identified by US surveillance following negative SLNB. Three patients (3/49, 6.1%) had events during follow-up. Two developed metachronous primary tumours and one developed multiple synchronous tumours.

Conclusion: US surveillance following SLNB is variably implemented at our centre. These findings highlight the need for better defined and evidence-based protocols in this patient cohort.

早期口腔鳞状细胞癌前哨淋巴结活检阴性后的超声监测:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:临床淋巴结阴性颈部T1/T2口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的处理存在争议。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)可以突出需要选择性颈部清扫(SND)的患者;其假阴性率需要术后监测,以发现漏诊的颈部淋巴结转移(CLNM),并允许抢救手术。超声(US)结合临床检查通常用于观察;然而,最佳方案尚不清楚。本回顾性队列研究旨在评估我们中心T1/T2 OSCC患者SLNB阴性后的随访监测。方法:对58例患者进行回顾性分析。9例(15.5%)SLNB阳性并接受进一步治疗。在剩下的49例患者中,收集了美国使用情况、时间和结果事件的数据。主要结局是通过US检查确定的CLNM。结果:共进行了51次超声检查。第一次美国的中位时间为7个月(范围2-48,n = 29),第二次为16.5个月(范围8-50,n = 14),第三次为26个月(范围14-65,n = 7),第四次为26个月(n = 1),与当地方案有相当大的偏差。SLNB阴性后美国监测未发现CLNM。随访期间发生事件3例(3/49,6.1%)。2例发生异时原发肿瘤,1例发生多发同步肿瘤。结论:美国对SLNB的监测在我们的中心是可变的。这些发现强调了在该患者队列中需要更好地定义和基于证据的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书