Childhood obesity interventions among Latinos residing in the US-Mexico border: a systematic review and meta-analysis of obesity outcomes.

IF 3.3
Patricia Dionicio, Zahid Garcia Lopez, Kimberly D Sánchez, Bianca Vargas Tequida, Alva Nidia Laprada Villegas, Juan Pablo Paullada, Daniela Guadalupe Gonzalez-Valencia, María Isabel Ortega, Siddarth Singh, Noe C Crespo
{"title":"Childhood obesity interventions among Latinos residing in the US-Mexico border: a systematic review and meta-analysis of obesity outcomes.","authors":"Patricia Dionicio, Zahid Garcia Lopez, Kimberly D Sánchez, Bianca Vargas Tequida, Alva Nidia Laprada Villegas, Juan Pablo Paullada, Daniela Guadalupe Gonzalez-Valencia, María Isabel Ortega, Siddarth Singh, Noe C Crespo","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaag056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The United States and Mexico have similarly high childhood obesity trends, especially among underserved populations and communities living in the US-Mexico border region. To date, limited research has compared childhood obesity prevention interventions in both US and Mexico border states. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of childhood obesity interventions on obesity outcomes among Hispanic/Latino children residing in US-Mexico border states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted using multiple US and Mexico-based databases through February 2026. The search focused on prospective randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies examining the effect of behavioral interventions on preventing childhood obesity in children aged 3-12 years residing in the US or Mexico border states. Random-effects models were applied using the inverse-variance weight method to assess intervention effects on body mass index (BMI), BMI z-scores, BMI percentile, waist circumference, and body fat percentage. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to assess moderators of intervention efficacy based on parental involvement, country, border region, intervention target level, and intervention duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,759 studies were initially identified, and 90 studies met the inclusion criteria for full extraction and analysis. Of the 90 included studies, 79% were conducted in US border states and 60% were quasi experimental studies. Meta-analyses demonstrated no significant improvements in obesity outcomes across the studies. In quasi-experimental studies with a control group, interventions that included parental involvement demonstrated no significant changes in BMI z-scores (d = -0.01; 95% CI, -0.12 to 1.26), whereas interventions without parental involvement demonstrated moderate increases in BMI z-scores (d = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.03 to 1.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Childhood obesity prevention interventions conducted in US-Mexico border states or within the border region were not associated with improvements in obesity outcomes, regardless of measure or study design. However, parental involvement may play a role in preventing substantial increases in BMI. Future research should examine intervention effects on obesity-related biomarkers, physical fitness, and dietary outcomes, which may provide more sensitive indicators of efficacy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202440046, doi: 10.37766/inplasy2024.4.0046).</p>","PeriodicalId":520558,"journal":{"name":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13581397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaag056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The United States and Mexico have similarly high childhood obesity trends, especially among underserved populations and communities living in the US-Mexico border region. To date, limited research has compared childhood obesity prevention interventions in both US and Mexico border states. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of childhood obesity interventions on obesity outcomes among Hispanic/Latino children residing in US-Mexico border states.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using multiple US and Mexico-based databases through February 2026. The search focused on prospective randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies examining the effect of behavioral interventions on preventing childhood obesity in children aged 3-12 years residing in the US or Mexico border states. Random-effects models were applied using the inverse-variance weight method to assess intervention effects on body mass index (BMI), BMI z-scores, BMI percentile, waist circumference, and body fat percentage. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to assess moderators of intervention efficacy based on parental involvement, country, border region, intervention target level, and intervention duration.

Results: A total of 7,759 studies were initially identified, and 90 studies met the inclusion criteria for full extraction and analysis. Of the 90 included studies, 79% were conducted in US border states and 60% were quasi experimental studies. Meta-analyses demonstrated no significant improvements in obesity outcomes across the studies. In quasi-experimental studies with a control group, interventions that included parental involvement demonstrated no significant changes in BMI z-scores (d = -0.01; 95% CI, -0.12 to 1.26), whereas interventions without parental involvement demonstrated moderate increases in BMI z-scores (d = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.03 to 1.31).

Conclusions: Childhood obesity prevention interventions conducted in US-Mexico border states or within the border region were not associated with improvements in obesity outcomes, regardless of measure or study design. However, parental involvement may play a role in preventing substantial increases in BMI. Future research should examine intervention effects on obesity-related biomarkers, physical fitness, and dietary outcomes, which may provide more sensitive indicators of efficacy.

Clinical trial registration number: International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY202440046, doi: 10.37766/inplasy2024.4.0046).

居住在美墨边境的拉美裔儿童肥胖干预:肥胖结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:美国和墨西哥的儿童肥胖趋势相似,特别是在服务不足的人口和居住在美墨边境地区的社区。迄今为止,有限的研究比较了美国和墨西哥边境州的儿童肥胖预防干预措施。本系统文献综述和荟萃分析旨在评估儿童肥胖干预措施对居住在美墨边境各州的西班牙裔/拉丁裔儿童肥胖结局的疗效。方法:到2026年2月,使用多个基于美国和墨西哥的数据库进行了系统的文献综述。研究的重点是前瞻性随机对照试验或准实验研究,研究行为干预对居住在美国或墨西哥边境州的3-12岁儿童预防肥胖的影响。采用随机效应模型,采用反方差加权法评估干预对体重指数(BMI)、BMI z分数、BMI百分位数、腰围和体脂率的影响。通过亚组和meta回归分析,评估父母参与、国家、边境地区、干预目标水平和干预持续时间等因素对干预效果的影响。结果:初步确定了7759项研究,其中90项研究符合充分提取和分析的纳入标准。在纳入的90项研究中,79%是在美国边境州进行的,60%是准实验研究。荟萃分析显示,在所有研究中,肥胖结果没有显著改善。在与对照组的准实验研究中,包括父母参与的干预显示BMI z-score没有显著变化(d = -0.01; 95% CI, -0.12至1.26),而没有父母参与的干预显示BMI z-score适度增加(d = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.03至1.31)。结论:在美墨边境州或边境地区进行的儿童肥胖预防干预与肥胖结局的改善无关,无论测量或研究设计如何。然而,父母的参与可能在防止体重指数大幅上升方面发挥作用。未来的研究应该检查干预对肥胖相关生物标志物、身体健康和饮食结果的影响,这可能会提供更敏感的疗效指标。临床试验注册号:国际注册系统评价和荟萃分析方案平台(INPLASY202440046, doi: 10.37766/inplasy2024.4.0046)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书