Screening of natural compounds library for protection against endoplasmic reticulum stress in corneal endothelial cells.

IF 2.4
Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-09-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2026.1945775
Stephanie Lee, Anisha Kasi, Minwoo Kwon, Stefan Y Kim, Saba Qureshi, Varun Kumar
{"title":"Screening of natural compounds library for protection against endoplasmic reticulum stress in corneal endothelial cells.","authors":"Stephanie Lee, Anisha Kasi, Minwoo Kwon, Stefan Y Kim, Saba Qureshi, Varun Kumar","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2026.1945775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated cell death contributes to many ocular diseases, including Fuchs corneal endothelial dystrophy (FECD). Natural compounds possess significant pharmacological activities necessary for vital cell signaling pathways and are considered protective in many ocular diseases such as diabetes, retinopathy, and glaucoma. However, there are limited studies examining the role of natural compounds in reducing sustained ER stress for improving corneal endothelial cell (CEnCs) survival. The purpose of this study is to identify readily available natural compounds to improve the viability of CEnCs under ER stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Human corneal endothelial cells (21T-HCEnC) were cultured and seeded in 384-well plates, pre-treated with 502 compounds from a natural product library (Enzo Screen-Well Natural Product library), and then subjected to ER stressor tunicamycin (1µg/mL) for 24 hours. Cell viability was measured using the Cell-Titer-Glo assay, and 74 compounds improved viability past the set threshold (≥ 30% increase in viability) and were selected for further dose-response testing. Further dose-response testing was performed using untreated F35T corneal endothelial cells, plated onto 384-well plates, and treated with a range of 6 log doses of each compound, from 10 pg/mL up to 1 μg/mL. After 24 hours of treatment, cell viability was measured again using the Cell-Titer Glo assay. Of the 4 natural compounds that improved viability past the set threshold at the lowest dose tested (0.00001 µg/mL), veratrine was analyzed further via western blotting, ranging from 10 pg/mL to 0.01 μg/mL. Apoptotic and unfolded protein response markers were also measured via western blotting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 502 compounds each administered at 0.01 µg/mL, we identified 74 compounds exhibiting 30% or more protection of 21T HCEnC cell viability in response to tunicamycin-induced stress. Of the 74 compounds that underwent further dose-response testing, 4 compounds improved cell viability by 30% or more at the lowest dose of compound tested compared to viability of F35T cells at baseline. Cevadine, or veratrine, was chosen for further analysis due to its function as a sodium channel agonist and its interaction with Na<sup>+</sup>/K<sup>+</sup> ATPase channels. Pretreatment with veratrine 0.01 µg/mL, along with tunicamycin, downregulated expression levels of cleaved caspase 9, PARP, cytochrome C, Bax, and cleaved caspase 3. Western blots of FECD cell line under tunicamycin-induced ER stress, pretreated with veratrine 0.01 µg/mL, also showed reduced markers from all three ER unfolded protein response pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided insight into the role of natural compounds in regulating ER stress-mediated CEnC death associated with many corneal endothelial-associated diseases. Veratrine was found to have a protective effect on ER-stressed CEnCs, as indicated by reduced apoptotic signals and ER stress markers following veratrine treatment, suggesting a possible mechanism of action via mediating ER stress signals. Future studies are needed to clarify the mechanism and utility of veratrine in FECD.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1945775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13645584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2026.1945775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated cell death contributes to many ocular diseases, including Fuchs corneal endothelial dystrophy (FECD). Natural compounds possess significant pharmacological activities necessary for vital cell signaling pathways and are considered protective in many ocular diseases such as diabetes, retinopathy, and glaucoma. However, there are limited studies examining the role of natural compounds in reducing sustained ER stress for improving corneal endothelial cell (CEnCs) survival. The purpose of this study is to identify readily available natural compounds to improve the viability of CEnCs under ER stress.

Methods: Human corneal endothelial cells (21T-HCEnC) were cultured and seeded in 384-well plates, pre-treated with 502 compounds from a natural product library (Enzo Screen-Well Natural Product library), and then subjected to ER stressor tunicamycin (1µg/mL) for 24 hours. Cell viability was measured using the Cell-Titer-Glo assay, and 74 compounds improved viability past the set threshold (≥ 30% increase in viability) and were selected for further dose-response testing. Further dose-response testing was performed using untreated F35T corneal endothelial cells, plated onto 384-well plates, and treated with a range of 6 log doses of each compound, from 10 pg/mL up to 1 μg/mL. After 24 hours of treatment, cell viability was measured again using the Cell-Titer Glo assay. Of the 4 natural compounds that improved viability past the set threshold at the lowest dose tested (0.00001 µg/mL), veratrine was analyzed further via western blotting, ranging from 10 pg/mL to 0.01 μg/mL. Apoptotic and unfolded protein response markers were also measured via western blotting.

Results: Of 502 compounds each administered at 0.01 µg/mL, we identified 74 compounds exhibiting 30% or more protection of 21T HCEnC cell viability in response to tunicamycin-induced stress. Of the 74 compounds that underwent further dose-response testing, 4 compounds improved cell viability by 30% or more at the lowest dose of compound tested compared to viability of F35T cells at baseline. Cevadine, or veratrine, was chosen for further analysis due to its function as a sodium channel agonist and its interaction with Na+/K+ ATPase channels. Pretreatment with veratrine 0.01 µg/mL, along with tunicamycin, downregulated expression levels of cleaved caspase 9, PARP, cytochrome C, Bax, and cleaved caspase 3. Western blots of FECD cell line under tunicamycin-induced ER stress, pretreated with veratrine 0.01 µg/mL, also showed reduced markers from all three ER unfolded protein response pathways.

Conclusions: This study provided insight into the role of natural compounds in regulating ER stress-mediated CEnC death associated with many corneal endothelial-associated diseases. Veratrine was found to have a protective effect on ER-stressed CEnCs, as indicated by reduced apoptotic signals and ER stress markers following veratrine treatment, suggesting a possible mechanism of action via mediating ER stress signals. Future studies are needed to clarify the mechanism and utility of veratrine in FECD.

角膜内皮细胞抗内质网应激天然化合物文库的筛选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书