Variability in Stroke Journeys: A Qualitative Study of Experiences of Persons With Stroke.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Asma Sabri, Heidi Dombestein, Peter Dieckmann, Stephen J M Sollid, Karina Aase
{"title":"Variability in Stroke Journeys: A Qualitative Study of Experiences of Persons With Stroke.","authors":"Asma Sabri, Heidi Dombestein, Peter Dieckmann, Stephen J M Sollid, Karina Aase","doi":"10.1111/hex.70902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke recovery is highly individual and often involves multiple transitions across healthcare settings. While standardised stroke pathways aim to improve quality of care, less is known about how persons with stroke experience person-centred practice throughout their stroke journeys.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how persons with stroke experience person-centred practice throughout their stroke journeys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted with persons who had experienced stroke in Norway. Data were collected through twelve semi-structured interviews and one written response. Reflexive thematic analysis, narrative construction and patient journey mapping were used to explore their experiences across the first 3 months post-stroke onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' stroke journeys varied considerably in symptom presentation, needs and care experiences. Journey mapping visualised the differences in stroke journeys, healthcare interactions and experiences. Four themes were identified from the cross-interview analysis: (1) Professional competence and relational care, (2) When the stroke pathway ends, the person's journey continues, (3) Standardised care versus individualised needs and (4) Participation across the journey. Experiences were generally positive in the hyperacute and acute phases and more variable following discharge, with participants describing limited follow-up and access to rehabilitation, as well as unmet holistic needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persons with stroke experiences varied considerably throughout their stroke journeys, with discharge to home regarded as a stressful, insufficiently supported phase of care. Supporting continuity and individualised approaches to care should better meet the diverse needs of persons with stroke.</p><p><strong>Patient and public contribution: </strong>A user group consisting of persons with stroke and informal caregivers was recruited through a Norwegian stroke survivors association to be involved throughout the study. The user group consisted of seven persons, four females and three males, with ages ranging from their 40s to their 80s. The group included persons with stroke, persons with severe stroke, a person with aphasia, informal caregivers and the leader of the stroke association, who is also an informal caregiver. Two meetings, text communications and individual informal conversations took place with the user group to present and discuss the study design and obtain feedback on the interview content, format and procedures. The user group also supported participant recruitment. These participants took part in the interviews that form the basis of this study. Informal caregiver interviews were conducted in parallel as part of a related study. Preliminary findings were presented at the stroke survivors association's conference, and feedback was obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70902"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13648015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke recovery is highly individual and often involves multiple transitions across healthcare settings. While standardised stroke pathways aim to improve quality of care, less is known about how persons with stroke experience person-centred practice throughout their stroke journeys.

Aim: To explore how persons with stroke experience person-centred practice throughout their stroke journeys.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with persons who had experienced stroke in Norway. Data were collected through twelve semi-structured interviews and one written response. Reflexive thematic analysis, narrative construction and patient journey mapping were used to explore their experiences across the first 3 months post-stroke onset.

Results: Participants' stroke journeys varied considerably in symptom presentation, needs and care experiences. Journey mapping visualised the differences in stroke journeys, healthcare interactions and experiences. Four themes were identified from the cross-interview analysis: (1) Professional competence and relational care, (2) When the stroke pathway ends, the person's journey continues, (3) Standardised care versus individualised needs and (4) Participation across the journey. Experiences were generally positive in the hyperacute and acute phases and more variable following discharge, with participants describing limited follow-up and access to rehabilitation, as well as unmet holistic needs.

Conclusions: Persons with stroke experiences varied considerably throughout their stroke journeys, with discharge to home regarded as a stressful, insufficiently supported phase of care. Supporting continuity and individualised approaches to care should better meet the diverse needs of persons with stroke.

Patient and public contribution: A user group consisting of persons with stroke and informal caregivers was recruited through a Norwegian stroke survivors association to be involved throughout the study. The user group consisted of seven persons, four females and three males, with ages ranging from their 40s to their 80s. The group included persons with stroke, persons with severe stroke, a person with aphasia, informal caregivers and the leader of the stroke association, who is also an informal caregiver. Two meetings, text communications and individual informal conversations took place with the user group to present and discuss the study design and obtain feedback on the interview content, format and procedures. The user group also supported participant recruitment. These participants took part in the interviews that form the basis of this study. Informal caregiver interviews were conducted in parallel as part of a related study. Preliminary findings were presented at the stroke survivors association's conference, and feedback was obtained.

中风旅程的可变性:中风患者经验的定性研究。
背景:脑卒中恢复是高度个体化的,通常涉及多个医疗机构的过渡。虽然标准化的卒中路径旨在提高护理质量,但人们对卒中患者在卒中过程中如何经历以人为本的实践知之甚少。目的:探讨中风患者在中风过程中如何体验以人为本的实践。方法:对挪威中风患者进行定性研究。数据通过12次半结构化访谈和一次书面回复收集。采用反身性主题分析、叙事构建和病人旅程图来探讨他们在中风发作后的前3个月的经历。结果:参与者的中风旅程在症状表现、需求和护理经历方面差异很大。旅程地图可视化了中风旅程、医疗保健互动和经历的差异。从交叉访谈分析中确定了四个主题:(1)专业能力和关系护理,(2)当中风路径结束时,个人的旅程继续,(3)标准化护理与个性化需求,(4)整个旅程的参与。在超急性期和急性期的经历通常是积极的,而出院后的经历则更加多变,参与者描述了有限的随访和康复机会,以及未满足的整体需求。结论:中风患者的经历在整个中风过程中变化很大,出院回家被认为是一个压力大、支持不足的护理阶段。支持连续性和个性化护理方法应更好地满足中风患者的多样化需求。患者和公众贡献:通过挪威中风幸存者协会招募了一个由中风患者和非正式护理人员组成的用户组参与整个研究。用户组由7人组成,4女3男,年龄从40岁到80岁不等。这个小组包括中风患者,严重中风患者,失语症患者,非正式护理人员和中风协会的领导,他也是一名非正式护理人员。与用户组进行了两次会议、文字交流和个别非正式对话,以介绍和讨论研究设计,并获得关于访谈内容、格式和程序的反馈。用户组亦支持招募参加者。这些参与者参加了构成本研究基础的访谈。非正式护理人员访谈作为相关研究的一部分并行进行。初步研究结果在中风幸存者协会会议上公布,并获得了反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书