Erector Spinae Plane Block at Two Volumes vs. Standard Analgesia for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 0.8
Mustafa Turpcu, Omer Faruk Boran, Ayse Azak Bozan, Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol, Mahmut Arslan, Mustafa Metin
{"title":"Erector Spinae Plane Block at Two Volumes <em>vs.</em> Standard Analgesia for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Mustafa Turpcu, Omer Faruk Boran, Ayse Azak Bozan, Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol, Mahmut Arslan, Mustafa Metin","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2026.10.1299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a T11 erector spinae plane block (ESPB) administered at two different volumes reduces postoperative tramadol consumption following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A randomised, single-blind controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Urology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Health Practice and Research Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkiye, between September 2023 and July 2024.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, aged 18-65 years and undergoing RIRS, were randomised into three groups (n = 20 each): a control group (no block; intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg), an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group receiving 20 mL, and an ESPB group receiving 30 mL, all using 0.5% bupivacaine diluted to the volume. ESPB was performed preoperatively at T11 under ultrasound guidance. All patients received tramadol via patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was 24-hour tramadol consumption. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, rescue analgesia, nausea/vomiting, and haemodynamics. Continuous variables were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test; categorical variables were analysed using the chi-square test (p <0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups were comparable. Total tramadol consumption differed significantly among the groups (p <0.001). Post hoc analysis showed that both the ESPB-20 and ESPB-30 groups had significantly lower tramadol consumption than the control group, whereas no significant difference was observed between the ESPB groups. VAS scores, rescue analgesia, and adverse effects were similar. No complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative T11 ESPB reduces opioid consumption after RIRS, with 20 mL appearing sufficient.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Erector spinae plane block, Retrograde intrarenal surgery, Postoperative pain, Tramadol, Regional anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"36 10","pages":"1299-1304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2026.10.1299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether a T11 erector spinae plane block (ESPB) administered at two different volumes reduces postoperative tramadol consumption following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Study design: A randomised, single-blind controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Urology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Health Practice and Research Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkiye, between September 2023 and July 2024.

Methodology: Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, aged 18-65 years and undergoing RIRS, were randomised into three groups (n = 20 each): a control group (no block; intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg), an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group receiving 20 mL, and an ESPB group receiving 30 mL, all using 0.5% bupivacaine diluted to the volume. ESPB was performed preoperatively at T11 under ultrasound guidance. All patients received tramadol via patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was 24-hour tramadol consumption. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, rescue analgesia, nausea/vomiting, and haemodynamics. Continuous variables were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test; categorical variables were analysed using the chi-square test (p <0.05).

Results: Groups were comparable. Total tramadol consumption differed significantly among the groups (p <0.001). Post hoc analysis showed that both the ESPB-20 and ESPB-30 groups had significantly lower tramadol consumption than the control group, whereas no significant difference was observed between the ESPB groups. VAS scores, rescue analgesia, and adverse effects were similar. No complications occurred.

Conclusion: Preoperative T11 ESPB reduces opioid consumption after RIRS, with 20 mL appearing sufficient.

Key words: Erector spinae plane block, Retrograde intrarenal surgery, Postoperative pain, Tramadol, Regional anaesthesia.

直立者脊柱平面阻滞与标准镇痛在逆行肾内手术:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评估两种不同体积的T11竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)是否能减少逆行肾内手术(RIRS)术后曲马多的消耗。研究设计:随机、单盲对照试验。研究地点和时间:2023年9月至2024年7月,土耳其Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam大学健康实践和研究医院泌尿科。方法:60例美国麻醉师学会(ASA)身体状态为I-II的患者,年龄18-65岁,接受RIRS治疗,随机分为三组(每组20例):对照组(无阻滞,静脉注射曲马多1 mg/kg),超声引导直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)组接受20 mL, ESPB组接受30 mL,均使用0.5%布比卡因稀释至体积。术前在超声引导下于T11行ESPB。所有患者均给予曲马多自控镇痛。主要终点为24小时曲马多摄入量。次要结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、抢救镇痛、恶心/呕吐和血流动力学。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析连续变量;使用卡方检验对分类变量进行分析(p)结果:组间具有可比性。结论:术前T11 ESPB可减少RIRS术后阿片类药物的消耗,20 mL似乎足够。关键词:竖脊肌平面阻滞,逆行肾内手术,术后疼痛,曲马多,区域麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书