Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Physical and Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Maryam Mohammadi, Amin Norouzi Fashkhami, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
{"title":"Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Physical and Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Maryam Mohammadi, Amin Norouzi Fashkhami, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban","doi":"10.1123/japa.2025-0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been investigated as a potential intervention to counteract age-related declines in cognitive and physical performance. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of HBOT on these domains in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251122497). A comprehensive search from inception to November 2025 was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify studies evaluating HBOT in individuals aged ≥50 years. Eligible studies assessed cognitive and/or physical outcomes using validated measures, adverse events when reported, and risk of bias was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with 502 participants aged 51-85 years met the inclusion criteria. HBOT protocols varied in pressure (2.0-2.2 absolute atmospheres), duration (60-90 min), and frequency (five to six sessions/week). Two high-quality studies in healthy older adults reported significant improvements in global cognition, attention, executive function, and processing speed as well as enhanced aerobic capacity and pulmonary function. In clinical populations including Parkinson's disease, cerebral small vessel disease, and vascular dementia, moderate-quality studies reported that HBOT combined with pharmacological treatments yielded greater cognitive gains than monotherapy. Physical improvements in these groups were mainly inferred from quality of life and symptom scores. Four studies reported HBOT-related adverse events, which were generally mild and self-limiting. Follow-up intervals ranged from 1 to 4 weeks to ≈12 weeks, limiting conclusions about durability of effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HBOT may improve cognitive performance in both healthy and clinical older adults and may offer modest benefits for physical performance, although physical improvements were sometimes inferred from functional or indirect measures. However, these findings remain preliminary given the limited number of studies, protocol heterogeneity, and moderate methodological quality. Reported adverse events were generally mild.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>HBOT may offer a novel therapeutic option to enhance cognitive performance and potentially improve physical and functional outcomes in older adults thereby supporting healthier aging and greater independence in daily life.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2025-0308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been investigated as a potential intervention to counteract age-related declines in cognitive and physical performance. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of HBOT on these domains in older adults.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251122497). A comprehensive search from inception to November 2025 was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify studies evaluating HBOT in individuals aged ≥50 years. Eligible studies assessed cognitive and/or physical outcomes using validated measures, adverse events when reported, and risk of bias was evaluated using the modified Downs and Black checklist.

Results: Seven studies with 502 participants aged 51-85 years met the inclusion criteria. HBOT protocols varied in pressure (2.0-2.2 absolute atmospheres), duration (60-90 min), and frequency (five to six sessions/week). Two high-quality studies in healthy older adults reported significant improvements in global cognition, attention, executive function, and processing speed as well as enhanced aerobic capacity and pulmonary function. In clinical populations including Parkinson's disease, cerebral small vessel disease, and vascular dementia, moderate-quality studies reported that HBOT combined with pharmacological treatments yielded greater cognitive gains than monotherapy. Physical improvements in these groups were mainly inferred from quality of life and symptom scores. Four studies reported HBOT-related adverse events, which were generally mild and self-limiting. Follow-up intervals ranged from 1 to 4 weeks to ≈12 weeks, limiting conclusions about durability of effects.

Conclusion: HBOT may improve cognitive performance in both healthy and clinical older adults and may offer modest benefits for physical performance, although physical improvements were sometimes inferred from functional or indirect measures. However, these findings remain preliminary given the limited number of studies, protocol heterogeneity, and moderate methodological quality. Reported adverse events were generally mild.

Implications: HBOT may offer a novel therapeutic option to enhance cognitive performance and potentially improve physical and functional outcomes in older adults thereby supporting healthier aging and greater independence in daily life.

高压氧治疗对老年人身体和认知能力的影响:一项系统综述。
背景和目的:高压氧治疗(HBOT)作为一种潜在的干预措施,已经被研究用来抵消与年龄相关的认知和身体机能下降。本系统综述旨在评估HBOT对老年人这些结构域的影响。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价,并在PROSPERO注册(ID: CRD420251122497)。在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、ProQuest、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar中进行了从成立到2025年11月的综合检索,以确定评估HBOT在≥50岁个体中的研究。符合条件的研究使用有效的测量方法评估认知和/或身体结果,报告不良事件,并使用修改的Downs和Black检查表评估偏倚风险。结果:7项研究502名51-85岁的受试者符合纳入标准。HBOT方案在压力(2.0-2.2绝对大气压)、持续时间(60-90分钟)和频率(5 - 6次/周)方面有所不同。两项针对健康老年人的高质量研究报告了全球认知、注意力、执行功能和处理速度的显著改善,以及有氧能力和肺功能的增强。在包括帕金森病、脑血管疾病和血管性痴呆在内的临床人群中,中等质量的研究报告称,HBOT联合药物治疗比单药治疗产生更大的认知收益。这些组的身体改善主要是从生活质量和症状评分来推断的。四项研究报告了与hbot相关的不良事件,这些不良事件通常是轻微和自限性的。随访时间从1 ~ 4周到约12周不等,限制了关于疗效持久性的结论。结论:HBOT可以改善健康和临床老年人的认知表现,并可能对身体表现有一定的好处,尽管有时从功能或间接测量中推断出身体改善。然而,由于研究数量有限、方案异质性和方法学质量适中,这些发现仍然是初步的。报告的不良事件一般是轻微的。意义:HBOT可能提供一种新的治疗选择,以增强老年人的认知能力,并可能改善老年人的身体和功能结果,从而支持更健康的老龄化和更大的日常生活独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults. In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书