Does Volunteering Give an Extra Health Boost? Volunteering and High Blood Pressure Among Insured and Uninsured U.S. Adults in Late Midlife.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Byeongju Ryu, Seoyoun Kim, Koichiro Shiba, Cal J Halvorsen
{"title":"Does Volunteering Give an Extra Health Boost? Volunteering and High Blood Pressure Among Insured and Uninsured U.S. Adults in Late Midlife.","authors":"Byeongju Ryu, Seoyoun Kim, Koichiro Shiba, Cal J Halvorsen","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High blood pressure (HBP) is a major predictor of cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of death in the U.S. Growing evidence suggests that formal volunteering in later life is associated with a lower prevalence of HBP; however, it remains unclear whether these benefits extend to adults in late midlife and whether they differ by health insurance status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study analyzed data from the 2012-2018 Health and Retirement Study. The analytic sample included 4,169 respondents between the ages of 50 and 64. Because blood pressure was measured in half the sample in alternating waves, data were pooled across waves. To address selection into volunteering, energy-balance weights were created using participants' pre-baseline (t₀; 2012/2014 subsamples) sociodemographic and health-related characteristics to balance the distribution of these characteristics between volunteers and non-volunteers at baseline (t₁; 2014/2016 subsamples). Weighted Poisson regression models with robust error variance estimated the population-average treatment effects of volunteering on HBP at post-baseline (t₂; 2016/2018 subsamples). Differences in effect estimates between insured and uninsured groups were assessed using seemingly unrelated estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volunteering was associated with a lower prevalence of HBP in the full sample (prevalence ratio (PR)=0.86, p=0.005). In subgroup analyses, compared with non-volunteers, volunteers were less likely to have HBP in both the uninsured (PR=0.64, p=0.005) and insured (PR=0.90, p=0.044) groups. The estimated effects differed significantly across groups (F[1, 4168]=4.05, p=0.044), indicating that volunteering may have a greater influence on reducing HBP prevalence among uninsured individuals than among insured counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volunteering may serve as a non-pharmacological, community-based intervention to support cardiovascular health in late midlife. While not a substitute for health insurance, findings suggest that uninsured individuals may derive additional health gains from volunteering.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108596"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High blood pressure (HBP) is a major predictor of cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of death in the U.S. Growing evidence suggests that formal volunteering in later life is associated with a lower prevalence of HBP; however, it remains unclear whether these benefits extend to adults in late midlife and whether they differ by health insurance status.

Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed data from the 2012-2018 Health and Retirement Study. The analytic sample included 4,169 respondents between the ages of 50 and 64. Because blood pressure was measured in half the sample in alternating waves, data were pooled across waves. To address selection into volunteering, energy-balance weights were created using participants' pre-baseline (t₀; 2012/2014 subsamples) sociodemographic and health-related characteristics to balance the distribution of these characteristics between volunteers and non-volunteers at baseline (t₁; 2014/2016 subsamples). Weighted Poisson regression models with robust error variance estimated the population-average treatment effects of volunteering on HBP at post-baseline (t₂; 2016/2018 subsamples). Differences in effect estimates between insured and uninsured groups were assessed using seemingly unrelated estimation.

Results: Volunteering was associated with a lower prevalence of HBP in the full sample (prevalence ratio (PR)=0.86, p=0.005). In subgroup analyses, compared with non-volunteers, volunteers were less likely to have HBP in both the uninsured (PR=0.64, p=0.005) and insured (PR=0.90, p=0.044) groups. The estimated effects differed significantly across groups (F[1, 4168]=4.05, p=0.044), indicating that volunteering may have a greater influence on reducing HBP prevalence among uninsured individuals than among insured counterparts.

Conclusions: Volunteering may serve as a non-pharmacological, community-based intervention to support cardiovascular health in late midlife. While not a substitute for health insurance, findings suggest that uninsured individuals may derive additional health gains from volunteering.

志愿服务能额外促进健康吗?美国参保和未参保中年人的志愿服务与高血压
简介:高血压(HBP)是心血管疾病的主要预测因子,在美国是导致死亡的主要原因。越来越多的证据表明,晚年正式的志愿活动与较低的HBP患病率相关;然而,目前尚不清楚这些好处是否会延伸到中年晚期的成年人,以及是否因健康保险状况而有所不同。方法:本前瞻性队列研究分析了2012-2018年健康与退休研究的数据。分析样本包括4169名年龄在50岁至64岁之间的受访者。因为在一半的样本中,血压是在交替波中测量的,所以数据是跨波汇总的。为了解决志愿服务的选择问题,使用参与者的基线前(t 0; 2012/2014子样本)社会人口和健康相关特征创建了能量平衡权重,以平衡基线时志愿者和非志愿者之间这些特征的分布(t 1; 2014/2016子样本)。具有稳健误差方差的加权泊松回归模型估计了志愿者在基线后对HBP的总体平均治疗效果(t 2; 2016/2018子样本)。使用看似不相关的估计来评估参保组和未参保组之间效果估计的差异。结果:在整个样本中,志愿活动与较低的HBP患病率相关(患病率比(PR)=0.86, p=0.005)。在亚组分析中,与非志愿者相比,志愿者在未参保组(PR=0.64, p=0.005)和参保组(PR=0.90, p=0.044)中发生HBP的可能性都较低。估计效果在各组间差异显著(F[1,4168]=4.05, p=0.044),表明志愿服务可能对降低未参保个体的HBP患病率有更大的影响。结论:志愿服务可以作为一种非药物的、基于社区的干预措施来支持中年后期的心血管健康。虽然不能替代健康保险,但研究结果表明,没有保险的人可能会从志愿服务中获得额外的健康收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书