Byeongju Ryu, Seoyoun Kim, Koichiro Shiba, Cal J Halvorsen
{"title":"Does Volunteering Give an Extra Health Boost? Volunteering and High Blood Pressure Among Insured and Uninsured U.S. Adults in Late Midlife.","authors":"Byeongju Ryu, Seoyoun Kim, Koichiro Shiba, Cal J Halvorsen","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High blood pressure (HBP) is a major predictor of cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of death in the U.S. Growing evidence suggests that formal volunteering in later life is associated with a lower prevalence of HBP; however, it remains unclear whether these benefits extend to adults in late midlife and whether they differ by health insurance status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study analyzed data from the 2012-2018 Health and Retirement Study. The analytic sample included 4,169 respondents between the ages of 50 and 64. Because blood pressure was measured in half the sample in alternating waves, data were pooled across waves. To address selection into volunteering, energy-balance weights were created using participants' pre-baseline (t₀; 2012/2014 subsamples) sociodemographic and health-related characteristics to balance the distribution of these characteristics between volunteers and non-volunteers at baseline (t₁; 2014/2016 subsamples). Weighted Poisson regression models with robust error variance estimated the population-average treatment effects of volunteering on HBP at post-baseline (t₂; 2016/2018 subsamples). Differences in effect estimates between insured and uninsured groups were assessed using seemingly unrelated estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volunteering was associated with a lower prevalence of HBP in the full sample (prevalence ratio (PR)=0.86, p=0.005). In subgroup analyses, compared with non-volunteers, volunteers were less likely to have HBP in both the uninsured (PR=0.64, p=0.005) and insured (PR=0.90, p=0.044) groups. The estimated effects differed significantly across groups (F[1, 4168]=4.05, p=0.044), indicating that volunteering may have a greater influence on reducing HBP prevalence among uninsured individuals than among insured counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volunteering may serve as a non-pharmacological, community-based intervention to support cardiovascular health in late midlife. While not a substitute for health insurance, findings suggest that uninsured individuals may derive additional health gains from volunteering.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108596"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: High blood pressure (HBP) is a major predictor of cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of death in the U.S. Growing evidence suggests that formal volunteering in later life is associated with a lower prevalence of HBP; however, it remains unclear whether these benefits extend to adults in late midlife and whether they differ by health insurance status.
Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed data from the 2012-2018 Health and Retirement Study. The analytic sample included 4,169 respondents between the ages of 50 and 64. Because blood pressure was measured in half the sample in alternating waves, data were pooled across waves. To address selection into volunteering, energy-balance weights were created using participants' pre-baseline (t₀; 2012/2014 subsamples) sociodemographic and health-related characteristics to balance the distribution of these characteristics between volunteers and non-volunteers at baseline (t₁; 2014/2016 subsamples). Weighted Poisson regression models with robust error variance estimated the population-average treatment effects of volunteering on HBP at post-baseline (t₂; 2016/2018 subsamples). Differences in effect estimates between insured and uninsured groups were assessed using seemingly unrelated estimation.
Results: Volunteering was associated with a lower prevalence of HBP in the full sample (prevalence ratio (PR)=0.86, p=0.005). In subgroup analyses, compared with non-volunteers, volunteers were less likely to have HBP in both the uninsured (PR=0.64, p=0.005) and insured (PR=0.90, p=0.044) groups. The estimated effects differed significantly across groups (F[1, 4168]=4.05, p=0.044), indicating that volunteering may have a greater influence on reducing HBP prevalence among uninsured individuals than among insured counterparts.
Conclusions: Volunteering may serve as a non-pharmacological, community-based intervention to support cardiovascular health in late midlife. While not a substitute for health insurance, findings suggest that uninsured individuals may derive additional health gains from volunteering.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.