Introducing the bowel huddle: An interprofessional approach to enhancing management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Molly Stewart, Malorie Heinen, Namrata Raut, Lisa E Guthrie
{"title":"Introducing the bowel huddle: An interprofessional approach to enhancing management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction.","authors":"Molly Stewart, Malorie Heinen, Namrata Raut, Lisa E Guthrie","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2026.2727245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is common after spinal cord injury (SCI) and contributes to prolonged hospitalization, reduced quality of life, and secondary complications. Interprofessional huddles may improve outcomes, safety, and staff autonomy. This study evaluated a weekly bowel huddle in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) from the perspective of frontline staff.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quality improvement initiative using a cross-sectional survey design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute 29-bed IRF at a large Midwest academic medical center, with 15.7% of total patients with SCI from 2024 requiring NBD management.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Frontline staff including registered nurses and licensed occupational therapists (<i>N</i> = 26) caring for patients with NBD due to SCI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Weekly interprofessional bowel huddle for NBD management.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Staff perceptions were collected using an 8-item Likert-type survey and 3 open-ended questions. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, independent-sample t-tests by timing of hire, and a framework qualitative analysis. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency was high (<i>α</i> = .85) with no differences by timing of hire. Staff agreed huddles improved communication and autonomy, though post-huddle communication needed improvement. Comments highlighted better coordination, team communication, and confidence with bowel protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An interprofessional Bowel Huddle for NBD management in patients with SCI may improve team communication, staff autonomy, and care coordination, and facilitate earlier patient and caregiver education, enhancing discharge readiness within an IRF setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2026.2727245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context/objective: Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is common after spinal cord injury (SCI) and contributes to prolonged hospitalization, reduced quality of life, and secondary complications. Interprofessional huddles may improve outcomes, safety, and staff autonomy. This study evaluated a weekly bowel huddle in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) from the perspective of frontline staff.

Design: Quality improvement initiative using a cross-sectional survey design.

Setting: Acute 29-bed IRF at a large Midwest academic medical center, with 15.7% of total patients with SCI from 2024 requiring NBD management.

Participants: Frontline staff including registered nurses and licensed occupational therapists (N = 26) caring for patients with NBD due to SCI.

Interventions: Weekly interprofessional bowel huddle for NBD management.

Outcome measures: Staff perceptions were collected using an 8-item Likert-type survey and 3 open-ended questions. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, independent-sample t-tests by timing of hire, and a framework qualitative analysis. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha.

Results: Internal consistency was high (α = .85) with no differences by timing of hire. Staff agreed huddles improved communication and autonomy, though post-huddle communication needed improvement. Comments highlighted better coordination, team communication, and confidence with bowel protocols.

Conclusion: An interprofessional Bowel Huddle for NBD management in patients with SCI may improve team communication, staff autonomy, and care coordination, and facilitate earlier patient and caregiver education, enhancing discharge readiness within an IRF setting.

介绍肠团:一种加强神经源性肠功能障碍管理的跨专业方法。
背景/目的:神经源性肠功能障碍(NBD)在脊髓损伤(SCI)后很常见,并导致住院时间延长、生活质量下降和继发性并发症。跨专业会议可以改善结果、安全性和员工自主权。本研究从一线人员的角度评估了住院康复机构(IRF)每周的肠道聚会。设计:采用横断面调查设计进行质量改进。背景:一家大型中西部学术医疗中心的急性29床IRF,从2024年起,15.7%的SCI患者需要NBD治疗。参与者:一线工作人员,包括注册护士和执业职业治疗师(N = 26),他们负责照顾因脊髓损伤导致的NBD患者。干预措施:每周一次的跨专业肠道会议来治疗NBD。结果测量:通过8项李克特式调查和3个开放式问题收集员工的看法。数据分析包括描述性统计、雇佣时间的独立样本t检验和框架定性分析。内部一致性信度采用Cronbach’s alpha评价。结果:内部一致性高(α = 0.85),不受聘用时间的影响。员工们一致认为,开会可以改善沟通和自主权,但开会后的沟通需要改进。评论强调了更好的协调、团队沟通和对肠道方案的信心。结论:对脊髓损伤患者进行NBD管理的跨专业肠道会议可以改善团队沟通、员工自主权和护理协调,促进早期患者和护理人员教育,增强IRF环境下的出院准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书