Seven principles for a critical transdisciplinary approach to planetary health.

IF 20.5 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Joan Benach, Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Christos Zografos, Laila Vivas, Joana Morrison, Eliana Martínez-Herrera, Ornella Moreno-Mattar, Natalia Tumas, Ferran Muntané, Mariana Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Juan Manuel Pericàs, Carles Muntaner
{"title":"Seven principles for a critical transdisciplinary approach to planetary health.","authors":"Joan Benach, Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Christos Zografos, Laila Vivas, Joana Morrison, Eliana Martínez-Herrera, Ornella Moreno-Mattar, Natalia Tumas, Ferran Muntané, Mariana Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Juan Manuel Pericàs, Carles Muntaner","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2026.101529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ecological, social, and health crises of the Anthropocene demand approaches to knowledge that confront complexity, uncertainty, and structural injustice. Transdisciplinarity is an approach that can transcend disciplinary silos by integrating academic and non-academic knowledge. Yet, action on public health, planetary health, and health inequities is often implemented in technocratic, depoliticised, and tokenistic ways. Such practices risk marginalising lived experience, reinforcing epistemic hierarchies, and overlooking structural drivers such as capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy. Drawing on examples from the exposome, One Health, and planetary health paradigms, we argue that current applications of transdisciplinarity privilege biomedical or technical framings, underplay systemic power relations, and fail to deliver transformative impact. A critical transdisciplinary approach is needed-one that is political, reflexive, justice oriented, and grounded in collaboration with affected communities, social movements, and practitioners. It should integrate diverse knowledge systems, value experiential and Indigenous perspectives, and align research with agendas for structural change. We propose seven guiding principles. The approach should be: critical, systemic, structural, sociohistorical, democratic, timely, and transformative. Advancing planetary health equity requires more than an understanding of the systemic determinants of disease and environmental degradation-it requires dismantling the political, economic, and cultural systems that perpetuate them. A critical transdisciplinary approach that follows these principles can guide research, policy, and practice, positioning knowledge not only as a tool for explanation but also as an instrument for transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":" ","pages":"101529"},"PeriodicalIF":20.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Planetary Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanplh.2026.101529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ecological, social, and health crises of the Anthropocene demand approaches to knowledge that confront complexity, uncertainty, and structural injustice. Transdisciplinarity is an approach that can transcend disciplinary silos by integrating academic and non-academic knowledge. Yet, action on public health, planetary health, and health inequities is often implemented in technocratic, depoliticised, and tokenistic ways. Such practices risk marginalising lived experience, reinforcing epistemic hierarchies, and overlooking structural drivers such as capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy. Drawing on examples from the exposome, One Health, and planetary health paradigms, we argue that current applications of transdisciplinarity privilege biomedical or technical framings, underplay systemic power relations, and fail to deliver transformative impact. A critical transdisciplinary approach is needed-one that is political, reflexive, justice oriented, and grounded in collaboration with affected communities, social movements, and practitioners. It should integrate diverse knowledge systems, value experiential and Indigenous perspectives, and align research with agendas for structural change. We propose seven guiding principles. The approach should be: critical, systemic, structural, sociohistorical, democratic, timely, and transformative. Advancing planetary health equity requires more than an understanding of the systemic determinants of disease and environmental degradation-it requires dismantling the political, economic, and cultural systems that perpetuate them. A critical transdisciplinary approach that follows these principles can guide research, policy, and practice, positioning knowledge not only as a tool for explanation but also as an instrument for transformation.

对地球健康采取关键跨学科方法的七项原则。
人类世的生态、社会和健康危机需要面对复杂性、不确定性和结构不公正的知识方法。跨学科是一种通过整合学术知识和非学术知识而超越学科藩篱的方法。然而,关于公共卫生、地球卫生和卫生不平等的行动往往以技术官僚、非政治化和象征性的方式实施。这种做法可能会使生活经验边缘化,强化认知等级,并忽视资本主义、殖民主义和父权制等结构性驱动因素。从暴露、同一个健康和地球健康范例中汲取例子,我们认为目前跨学科的应用特权生物医学或技术框架,低估了系统的权力关系,未能带来变革性的影响。需要一种关键的跨学科方法——一种政治性的、反思性的、以正义为导向的方法,并以与受影响社区、社会运动和从业者合作为基础。它应该整合不同的知识体系,重视经验和土著观点,并使研究与结构变革议程保持一致。我们提出七项指导原则。这种方法应该是:批判性的、系统性的、结构性的、社会历史性的、民主的、适时的和变革性的。推进全球健康公平需要的不仅仅是了解疾病和环境退化的系统性决定因素,还需要拆除导致这些问题长期存在的政治、经济和文化体系。遵循这些原则的关键跨学科方法可以指导研究、政策和实践,将知识定位为不仅是解释的工具,而且是转化的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Planetary Health is a gold Open Access journal dedicated to investigating and addressing the multifaceted determinants of healthy human civilizations and their impact on natural systems. Positioned as a key player in sustainable development, the journal covers a broad, interdisciplinary scope, encompassing areas such as poverty, nutrition, gender equity, water and sanitation, energy, economic growth, industrialization, inequality, urbanization, human consumption and production, climate change, ocean health, land use, peace, and justice. With a commitment to publishing high-quality research, comment, and correspondence, it aims to be the leading journal for sustainable development in the face of unprecedented dangers and threats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书