Joan Benach, Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Christos Zografos, Laila Vivas, Joana Morrison, Eliana Martínez-Herrera, Ornella Moreno-Mattar, Natalia Tumas, Ferran Muntané, Mariana Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Juan Manuel Pericàs, Carles Muntaner
{"title":"Seven principles for a critical transdisciplinary approach to planetary health.","authors":"Joan Benach, Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Christos Zografos, Laila Vivas, Joana Morrison, Eliana Martínez-Herrera, Ornella Moreno-Mattar, Natalia Tumas, Ferran Muntané, Mariana Gutiérrez-Zamora Navarro, Juan Manuel Pericàs, Carles Muntaner","doi":"10.1016/j.lanplh.2026.101529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ecological, social, and health crises of the Anthropocene demand approaches to knowledge that confront complexity, uncertainty, and structural injustice. Transdisciplinarity is an approach that can transcend disciplinary silos by integrating academic and non-academic knowledge. Yet, action on public health, planetary health, and health inequities is often implemented in technocratic, depoliticised, and tokenistic ways. Such practices risk marginalising lived experience, reinforcing epistemic hierarchies, and overlooking structural drivers such as capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy. Drawing on examples from the exposome, One Health, and planetary health paradigms, we argue that current applications of transdisciplinarity privilege biomedical or technical framings, underplay systemic power relations, and fail to deliver transformative impact. A critical transdisciplinary approach is needed-one that is political, reflexive, justice oriented, and grounded in collaboration with affected communities, social movements, and practitioners. It should integrate diverse knowledge systems, value experiential and Indigenous perspectives, and align research with agendas for structural change. We propose seven guiding principles. The approach should be: critical, systemic, structural, sociohistorical, democratic, timely, and transformative. Advancing planetary health equity requires more than an understanding of the systemic determinants of disease and environmental degradation-it requires dismantling the political, economic, and cultural systems that perpetuate them. A critical transdisciplinary approach that follows these principles can guide research, policy, and practice, positioning knowledge not only as a tool for explanation but also as an instrument for transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":" ","pages":"101529"},"PeriodicalIF":20.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Planetary Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanplh.2026.101529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ecological, social, and health crises of the Anthropocene demand approaches to knowledge that confront complexity, uncertainty, and structural injustice. Transdisciplinarity is an approach that can transcend disciplinary silos by integrating academic and non-academic knowledge. Yet, action on public health, planetary health, and health inequities is often implemented in technocratic, depoliticised, and tokenistic ways. Such practices risk marginalising lived experience, reinforcing epistemic hierarchies, and overlooking structural drivers such as capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy. Drawing on examples from the exposome, One Health, and planetary health paradigms, we argue that current applications of transdisciplinarity privilege biomedical or technical framings, underplay systemic power relations, and fail to deliver transformative impact. A critical transdisciplinary approach is needed-one that is political, reflexive, justice oriented, and grounded in collaboration with affected communities, social movements, and practitioners. It should integrate diverse knowledge systems, value experiential and Indigenous perspectives, and align research with agendas for structural change. We propose seven guiding principles. The approach should be: critical, systemic, structural, sociohistorical, democratic, timely, and transformative. Advancing planetary health equity requires more than an understanding of the systemic determinants of disease and environmental degradation-it requires dismantling the political, economic, and cultural systems that perpetuate them. A critical transdisciplinary approach that follows these principles can guide research, policy, and practice, positioning knowledge not only as a tool for explanation but also as an instrument for transformation.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Planetary Health is a gold Open Access journal dedicated to investigating and addressing the multifaceted determinants of healthy human civilizations and their impact on natural systems. Positioned as a key player in sustainable development, the journal covers a broad, interdisciplinary scope, encompassing areas such as poverty, nutrition, gender equity, water and sanitation, energy, economic growth, industrialization, inequality, urbanization, human consumption and production, climate change, ocean health, land use, peace, and justice.
With a commitment to publishing high-quality research, comment, and correspondence, it aims to be the leading journal for sustainable development in the face of unprecedented dangers and threats.