Lipid Traits and Risk of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization Study in UK Biobank.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frederick Ewbank, Cameron Pinn, Benjamin Gaastra, William Tapper, Ian Galea, Diederik Bulters
{"title":"Lipid Traits and Risk of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Mendelian Randomization Study in UK Biobank.","authors":"Frederick Ewbank, Cameron Pinn, Benjamin Gaastra, William Tapper, Ian Galea, Diederik Bulters","doi":"10.1007/s12975-026-01499-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lipid traits are established risk factors for atherosclerotic disease; however, their relationship with intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) remains unclear. Recent Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies have reported inconsistent findings. This study aimed to review the literature and assess the association between lipid traits and SAH using a one-sample MR analysis accounting for statin use and nonlinearity. We performed a systematic review of MR studies investigating lipid traits and intracranial aneurysms/SAH. A meta-analysis was not undertaken because studies used overlapping datasets. In parallel, we conducted a one-sample MR analysis of 486,603 UK Biobank participants. Genetic instruments for low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG) were derived from published genome-wide association studies. Associations with SAH were adjusted for lipid-lowering therapy. Nonlinear relationships were explored using cubic splines and piecewise MR. While eight MR studies met the inclusion criteria, seven relied on the same outcome cohort. Despite this, these studies showed no consistent direction of effect across lipid traits, suggesting that the estimates were unstable. In the UK Biobank, there was no evidence of an association between genetically predicted lipid traits and SAH for LDL (HR 1.06 [0.64-1.73]), HDL (HR 2.57 [0.42-15.74]), TC (HR 1.06 [0.71-1.60]), or TG (HR 1.05 [0.69-1.59). Results were consistent across different MR methods and sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for lipid-lowering therapy. Current evidence does not support a major association between lipid traits and SAH, with the heterogeneity observed across previous MR studies likely reflecting methodological limitations rather than a consistent biological effect. However, small effects and lipid-independent effects of lipid-lowering therapies cannot be excluded.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13649900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-026-01499-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lipid traits are established risk factors for atherosclerotic disease; however, their relationship with intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) remains unclear. Recent Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies have reported inconsistent findings. This study aimed to review the literature and assess the association between lipid traits and SAH using a one-sample MR analysis accounting for statin use and nonlinearity. We performed a systematic review of MR studies investigating lipid traits and intracranial aneurysms/SAH. A meta-analysis was not undertaken because studies used overlapping datasets. In parallel, we conducted a one-sample MR analysis of 486,603 UK Biobank participants. Genetic instruments for low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG) were derived from published genome-wide association studies. Associations with SAH were adjusted for lipid-lowering therapy. Nonlinear relationships were explored using cubic splines and piecewise MR. While eight MR studies met the inclusion criteria, seven relied on the same outcome cohort. Despite this, these studies showed no consistent direction of effect across lipid traits, suggesting that the estimates were unstable. In the UK Biobank, there was no evidence of an association between genetically predicted lipid traits and SAH for LDL (HR 1.06 [0.64-1.73]), HDL (HR 2.57 [0.42-15.74]), TC (HR 1.06 [0.71-1.60]), or TG (HR 1.05 [0.69-1.59). Results were consistent across different MR methods and sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for lipid-lowering therapy. Current evidence does not support a major association between lipid traits and SAH, with the heterogeneity observed across previous MR studies likely reflecting methodological limitations rather than a consistent biological effect. However, small effects and lipid-independent effects of lipid-lowering therapies cannot be excluded.

脂质特征和蛛网膜下腔出血的风险:英国生物银行的系统评价和孟德尔随机化研究。
脂质特征是动脉粥样硬化疾病的危险因素;然而,它们与颅内动脉瘤和蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的关系尚不清楚。最近的孟德尔随机化(MR)研究报告了不一致的结果。本研究旨在回顾文献,利用单样本MR分析,考虑他汀类药物的使用和非线性,评估脂质性状与SAH之间的关系。我们对研究脂质特征和颅内动脉瘤/SAH的MR研究进行了系统回顾。由于研究使用了重叠的数据集,因此没有进行荟萃分析。同时,我们对486,603名英国生物银行参与者进行了单样本MR分析。低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、总胆固醇(TC)和甘油三酯(TG)的遗传仪器来源于已发表的全基因组关联研究。与SAH的关联调整为降脂治疗。使用三次样条和分段MR探讨非线性关系。8项MR研究符合纳入标准,7项依赖于相同的结果队列。尽管如此,这些研究显示在脂质性状上没有一致的影响方向,这表明估计是不稳定的。在UK Biobank中,没有证据表明遗传预测的脂质性状与低密度脂蛋白(HR 1.06[0.64-1.73])、高密度脂蛋白(HR 2.57[0.42-15.74])、TC (HR 1.06[0.71-1.60])或TG (HR 1.05[0.69-1.59)的SAH之间存在关联。结果在不同的MR方法和敏感性分析中是一致的,包括对降脂治疗的调整。目前的证据并不支持脂质性状与SAH之间的主要关联,在之前的MR研究中观察到的异质性可能反映了方法学的局限性,而不是一致的生物学效应。然而,不能排除降脂疗法的小作用和脂质非依赖性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书