The Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior by Emergency Medical Services.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Erick H Cheung, Matt Jason V Llamas, Frederick Burton, Zainab N Ahmed, Jacqueline Rifenburg, Richard Tadeo, Denise Whitfield
{"title":"The Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior by Emergency Medical Services.","authors":"Erick H Cheung, Matt Jason V Llamas, Frederick Burton, Zainab N Ahmed, Jacqueline Rifenburg, Richard Tadeo, Denise Whitfield","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a001074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians, such as paramedics and emergency medical technicians, frequently respond to 911 calls involving patients with suicidal ideation or behavior (SIB); however, guidance for these complex prehospital encounters remains limited. This article describes the Los Angeles County EMS Agency's (LAC-EMSA) initiative to develop a comprehensive policy for evaluating and managing patients with SIB. A quality improvement (QI) committee approach was used to assess current practices, identify targets for improvement, design countermeasures, and implement policy changes. Key activities included reviewing national model guidelines and California's EMS agencies' policies; conducting interdisciplinary case reviews of EMS encounters with patients with SIB; surveying emergency departments on suicide screening practices; collecting EMS clinicians' perspectives on challenges and potential interventions; and evaluating commonly used suicide risk screening instruments. Findings were synthesized through committee discussions, identifying five critical domains for improvement: (1) standardized terminology; (2) evidence-based guidance for evaluating suicide risk; (3) enhanced decision support for patient disposition; (4) protocols for safety planning; and (5) strategies for collaboration with law enforcement and conflict resolution. The committee recommended a new comprehensive policy addressing these domains which was subsequently developed and implemented. Limitations include the initiative's focus on a single county EMS system, the absence of validated prehospital suicide risk screening tools, and the need for evaluation of the policy's effectiveness. This initiative demonstrates that EMS agencies can leverage QI methodologies to create evidence-informed policies that advance prehospital care for SIB and reduce variability in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians, such as paramedics and emergency medical technicians, frequently respond to 911 calls involving patients with suicidal ideation or behavior (SIB); however, guidance for these complex prehospital encounters remains limited. This article describes the Los Angeles County EMS Agency's (LAC-EMSA) initiative to develop a comprehensive policy for evaluating and managing patients with SIB. A quality improvement (QI) committee approach was used to assess current practices, identify targets for improvement, design countermeasures, and implement policy changes. Key activities included reviewing national model guidelines and California's EMS agencies' policies; conducting interdisciplinary case reviews of EMS encounters with patients with SIB; surveying emergency departments on suicide screening practices; collecting EMS clinicians' perspectives on challenges and potential interventions; and evaluating commonly used suicide risk screening instruments. Findings were synthesized through committee discussions, identifying five critical domains for improvement: (1) standardized terminology; (2) evidence-based guidance for evaluating suicide risk; (3) enhanced decision support for patient disposition; (4) protocols for safety planning; and (5) strategies for collaboration with law enforcement and conflict resolution. The committee recommended a new comprehensive policy addressing these domains which was subsequently developed and implemented. Limitations include the initiative's focus on a single county EMS system, the absence of validated prehospital suicide risk screening tools, and the need for evaluation of the policy's effectiveness. This initiative demonstrates that EMS agencies can leverage QI methodologies to create evidence-informed policies that advance prehospital care for SIB and reduce variability in practice.

急诊医疗机构对患者自杀意念或行为的评估与管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书