Heterogeneity in current guidelines for the management of gallbladder polyps ‒ A systematic review.

IF 4.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Luis Enrique Expósito Portales, Jorge Gerardo Pereira Fraga, Rafael de la Caridad Torres Peña, Hiram de Zacarías Rodríguez Blanco, Lisandra de la Caridad Rodríguez Gutierrez
{"title":"Heterogeneity in current guidelines for the management of gallbladder polyps ‒ A systematic review.","authors":"Luis Enrique Expósito Portales, Jorge Gerardo Pereira Fraga, Rafael de la Caridad Torres Peña, Hiram de Zacarías Rodríguez Blanco, Lisandra de la Caridad Rodríguez Gutierrez","doi":"10.17235/reed.2026.12024/2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallbladder polyps are elevated lesions of the gallbladder mucosa that protrude into its lumen. Their prevalence in the general population ranges from 0.3% to 9.5%. Guidelines regarding surgical indications and follow-up remain controversial due to regional differences in the development of malignancy. Hence, this systematic review was performed to assess the heterogeneity in current international guidelines for the management of gallbladder polyps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of the literature was conducted from PubMed and Google Scholar (from January 2020 to April 2026; in Spanish and English) for official clinical practice guidelines and updated consensus statements issued by scientific societies. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the AGREE II instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five guidelines were included in the review. The divergent aspects evaluated were: the size threshold for surgical treatment regardless of other malignancy risk factors (≥10 mm or ≥15 mm); the definition of significant growth (≥2-4 mm or unequivocal size increase upon visual assessment since the last follow-up); and the use of abdominal Doppler ultrasonography for risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Guidelines governing the management of gallbladder polyps vary. The best recommendation is to select the most appropriate guideline based on the behavior of this condition as observed in studies of the specific population receiving medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21342,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2026.12024/2026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gallbladder polyps are elevated lesions of the gallbladder mucosa that protrude into its lumen. Their prevalence in the general population ranges from 0.3% to 9.5%. Guidelines regarding surgical indications and follow-up remain controversial due to regional differences in the development of malignancy. Hence, this systematic review was performed to assess the heterogeneity in current international guidelines for the management of gallbladder polyps.

Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of the literature was conducted from PubMed and Google Scholar (from January 2020 to April 2026; in Spanish and English) for official clinical practice guidelines and updated consensus statements issued by scientific societies. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the AGREE II instrument.

Results: A total of five guidelines were included in the review. The divergent aspects evaluated were: the size threshold for surgical treatment regardless of other malignancy risk factors (≥10 mm or ≥15 mm); the definition of significant growth (≥2-4 mm or unequivocal size increase upon visual assessment since the last follow-up); and the use of abdominal Doppler ultrasonography for risk stratification.

Conclusion: Guidelines governing the management of gallbladder polyps vary. The best recommendation is to select the most appropriate guideline based on the behavior of this condition as observed in studies of the specific population receiving medical care.

胆囊息肉治疗指南的异质性——系统综述。
背景:胆囊息肉是胆囊粘膜的升高病变,突出到胆囊腔内。其在普通人群中的患病率为0.3%至9.5%。由于恶性肿瘤发展的地区差异,关于手术指征和随访的指南仍然存在争议。因此,本系统综述旨在评估当前国际胆囊息肉治疗指南的异质性。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对PubMed和谷歌Scholar(2020年1月至2026年4月,西班牙语和英语)的文献进行全面检索,以获取官方临床实践指南和科学学会发布的最新共识声明。纳入研究的方法学质量使用AGREE II工具进行评估。结果:本综述共纳入5项指南。评估的不同方面是:无论其他恶性危险因素(≥10 mm或≥15 mm),手术治疗的大小阈值;显著生长的定义(≥2-4 mm或自上次随访以来目视评估明显增大);以及使用腹部多普勒超声进行危险分层。结论:胆囊息肉的治疗指南各不相同。最好的建议是根据在接受医疗护理的特定人群的研究中观察到的这种情况的行为来选择最合适的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
400
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva (SEED) y Asociación Española de Ecografía Digestiva (AEED), publica artículos originales, editoriales, revisiones, casos clínicos, cartas al director, imágenes en patología digestiva, y otros artículos especiales sobre todos los aspectos relativos a las enfermedades digestivas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书