Long-Term Satisfaction with the Choice to Complete Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: The Hindsight 20/20 Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Alexandra Burtea, Jaime Almandoz, Marielle Nagele, Sunil Mathew, Luyu Xie, Kathleen Esselink, Jeffrey Schellinger, Sarah Messiah, Ildiko Lingvay
{"title":"Long-Term Satisfaction with the Choice to Complete Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: The Hindsight 20/20 Study.","authors":"Alexandra Burtea, Jaime Almandoz, Marielle Nagele, Sunil Mathew, Luyu Xie, Kathleen Esselink, Jeffrey Schellinger, Sarah Messiah, Ildiko Lingvay","doi":"10.1007/s11695-026-08984-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite proven benefits, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains underutilized. This study assessed long-term satisfaction among individuals after MBS and identified predictors of sustained satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional survey with retrospective EHR linkage, adults with prior MBS identified through electronic health records at a large academic medical center completed a satisfaction survey. LASSO regression was used for variable selection, followed by an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,385 respondents (mean age 55.1 +/- 12.2 years; 84.7% female; mean 12.0 +/- 7.5 years post-MBS), 74.2% would choose MBS again, 7.3% were unsure, and 18.5% would not. Overall health benefit was the most commonly reported reason for willingness to choose MBS again, whereas weight recurrence was the most commonly reported reason for uncertainty or unwillingness. In the exploratory adjusted model, greater pre-MBS BMI and maximum percent total weight loss were associated with higher odds of choosing MBS again, whereas longer time since MBS and higher current BMI were associated with lower odds. Percent recurrence of lost weight was not independently associated with the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most respondents remained satisfied long-term with their decision to undergo MBS. Time since surgery and current and historical weight measures were associated with willingness to choose MBS again, although these exploratory, mutually adjusted associations should not be interpreted as independent causal effects. These findings may inform counseling about the long-term benefits and limitations of MBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08984-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite proven benefits, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) remains underutilized. This study assessed long-term satisfaction among individuals after MBS and identified predictors of sustained satisfaction.

Research design and methods: In this cross-sectional survey with retrospective EHR linkage, adults with prior MBS identified through electronic health records at a large academic medical center completed a satisfaction survey. LASSO regression was used for variable selection, followed by an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model.

Results: Among 2,385 respondents (mean age 55.1 +/- 12.2 years; 84.7% female; mean 12.0 +/- 7.5 years post-MBS), 74.2% would choose MBS again, 7.3% were unsure, and 18.5% would not. Overall health benefit was the most commonly reported reason for willingness to choose MBS again, whereas weight recurrence was the most commonly reported reason for uncertainty or unwillingness. In the exploratory adjusted model, greater pre-MBS BMI and maximum percent total weight loss were associated with higher odds of choosing MBS again, whereas longer time since MBS and higher current BMI were associated with lower odds. Percent recurrence of lost weight was not independently associated with the outcome.

Conclusions: Most respondents remained satisfied long-term with their decision to undergo MBS. Time since surgery and current and historical weight measures were associated with willingness to choose MBS again, although these exploratory, mutually adjusted associations should not be interpreted as independent causal effects. These findings may inform counseling about the long-term benefits and limitations of MBS.

选择完成代谢和减肥手术的长期满意度:后见之明20/20研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书