Eun Ah Lee, Jae Hyeon Park, Seung Jun Kwack, Sang Kyu Lee, Byung Mu Lee, Hyung Sik Kim
{"title":"Toxicological insights and health risks of Didecyldimethylammonium Chloride (DDAC): an integrative review.","authors":"Eun Ah Lee, Jae Hyeon Park, Seung Jun Kwack, Sang Kyu Lee, Byung Mu Lee, Hyung Sik Kim","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2026.2740461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC) is a broad-spectrum quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) extensively utilized as a disinfectant and biocide. Widespread use of DDAC, significantly amplified during COVID-19 pandemic, increased human and environmental exposures, indicating need for updated, quantitative risk assessments. To comprehensively evaluate toxicological profile, exposure pathways, and risk characterization of DDAC, this integrative review synthesized regulatory databases (EPA, ECHA), peer-reviewed literature, and large-scale European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) monitoring data (>200,000 samples). Data demonstrated that DDAC exhibited low systemic absorption (<10%) and rapid fecal excretion, with no apparent evidence of carcinogenic, genotoxic or reproductive toxicity. Reported no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) varied depending upon species, study design, exposure route, and toxicological endpoint, with regulatory studies reporting values ranging from approximately 10 to 93.1 mg/kg/day. Quantitative margin of exposure (MOE) analyses confirm both (1)dietary intake, despite sporadic high residues in specific animal products, and (2) routine occupational dermal exposures maintained large safety margins. Conversely, aerosol-generating applications, such as fogging and humidifier use, present narrower margins, emphasizing critical role of ventilation parameters. Overall, DDAC exhibited low systemic toxicity under typical exposure conditions due to limited absorption and rapid elimination. However, accumulating mechanistic evidence indicates that DDAC might initiate portal-of-entry toxicity, including dermal, ocular, and respiratory irritation related to membrane disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses. Integrating regulatory evaluations with recent mechanistic findings provides a more comprehensive understanding of DDAC-induced toxicity, identifies important uncertainties regarding chronic aerosol exposure and environmental persistence, supporting continued refinement of human health and environmental risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2026.2740461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC) is a broad-spectrum quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) extensively utilized as a disinfectant and biocide. Widespread use of DDAC, significantly amplified during COVID-19 pandemic, increased human and environmental exposures, indicating need for updated, quantitative risk assessments. To comprehensively evaluate toxicological profile, exposure pathways, and risk characterization of DDAC, this integrative review synthesized regulatory databases (EPA, ECHA), peer-reviewed literature, and large-scale European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) monitoring data (>200,000 samples). Data demonstrated that DDAC exhibited low systemic absorption (<10%) and rapid fecal excretion, with no apparent evidence of carcinogenic, genotoxic or reproductive toxicity. Reported no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) varied depending upon species, study design, exposure route, and toxicological endpoint, with regulatory studies reporting values ranging from approximately 10 to 93.1 mg/kg/day. Quantitative margin of exposure (MOE) analyses confirm both (1)dietary intake, despite sporadic high residues in specific animal products, and (2) routine occupational dermal exposures maintained large safety margins. Conversely, aerosol-generating applications, such as fogging and humidifier use, present narrower margins, emphasizing critical role of ventilation parameters. Overall, DDAC exhibited low systemic toxicity under typical exposure conditions due to limited absorption and rapid elimination. However, accumulating mechanistic evidence indicates that DDAC might initiate portal-of-entry toxicity, including dermal, ocular, and respiratory irritation related to membrane disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses. Integrating regulatory evaluations with recent mechanistic findings provides a more comprehensive understanding of DDAC-induced toxicity, identifies important uncertainties regarding chronic aerosol exposure and environmental persistence, supporting continued refinement of human health and environmental risk assessments.
期刊介绍:
"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health.
Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews."
The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.