Toxicological insights and health risks of Didecyldimethylammonium Chloride (DDAC): an integrative review.

IF 11.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eun Ah Lee, Jae Hyeon Park, Seung Jun Kwack, Sang Kyu Lee, Byung Mu Lee, Hyung Sik Kim
{"title":"Toxicological insights and health risks of Didecyldimethylammonium Chloride (DDAC): an integrative review.","authors":"Eun Ah Lee, Jae Hyeon Park, Seung Jun Kwack, Sang Kyu Lee, Byung Mu Lee, Hyung Sik Kim","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2026.2740461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC) is a broad-spectrum quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) extensively utilized as a disinfectant and biocide. Widespread use of DDAC, significantly amplified during COVID-19 pandemic, increased human and environmental exposures, indicating need for updated, quantitative risk assessments. To comprehensively evaluate toxicological profile, exposure pathways, and risk characterization of DDAC, this integrative review synthesized regulatory databases (EPA, ECHA), peer-reviewed literature, and large-scale European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) monitoring data (>200,000 samples). Data demonstrated that DDAC exhibited low systemic absorption (<10%) and rapid fecal excretion, with no apparent evidence of carcinogenic, genotoxic or reproductive toxicity. Reported no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) varied depending upon species, study design, exposure route, and toxicological endpoint, with regulatory studies reporting values ranging from approximately 10 to 93.1 mg/kg/day. Quantitative margin of exposure (MOE) analyses confirm both (1)dietary intake, despite sporadic high residues in specific animal products, and (2) routine occupational dermal exposures maintained large safety margins. Conversely, aerosol-generating applications, such as fogging and humidifier use, present narrower margins, emphasizing critical role of ventilation parameters. Overall, DDAC exhibited low systemic toxicity under typical exposure conditions due to limited absorption and rapid elimination. However, accumulating mechanistic evidence indicates that DDAC might initiate portal-of-entry toxicity, including dermal, ocular, and respiratory irritation related to membrane disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses. Integrating regulatory evaluations with recent mechanistic findings provides a more comprehensive understanding of DDAC-induced toxicity, identifies important uncertainties regarding chronic aerosol exposure and environmental persistence, supporting continued refinement of human health and environmental risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2026.2740461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC) is a broad-spectrum quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) extensively utilized as a disinfectant and biocide. Widespread use of DDAC, significantly amplified during COVID-19 pandemic, increased human and environmental exposures, indicating need for updated, quantitative risk assessments. To comprehensively evaluate toxicological profile, exposure pathways, and risk characterization of DDAC, this integrative review synthesized regulatory databases (EPA, ECHA), peer-reviewed literature, and large-scale European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) monitoring data (>200,000 samples). Data demonstrated that DDAC exhibited low systemic absorption (<10%) and rapid fecal excretion, with no apparent evidence of carcinogenic, genotoxic or reproductive toxicity. Reported no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) varied depending upon species, study design, exposure route, and toxicological endpoint, with regulatory studies reporting values ranging from approximately 10 to 93.1 mg/kg/day. Quantitative margin of exposure (MOE) analyses confirm both (1)dietary intake, despite sporadic high residues in specific animal products, and (2) routine occupational dermal exposures maintained large safety margins. Conversely, aerosol-generating applications, such as fogging and humidifier use, present narrower margins, emphasizing critical role of ventilation parameters. Overall, DDAC exhibited low systemic toxicity under typical exposure conditions due to limited absorption and rapid elimination. However, accumulating mechanistic evidence indicates that DDAC might initiate portal-of-entry toxicity, including dermal, ocular, and respiratory irritation related to membrane disruption, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses. Integrating regulatory evaluations with recent mechanistic findings provides a more comprehensive understanding of DDAC-induced toxicity, identifies important uncertainties regarding chronic aerosol exposure and environmental persistence, supporting continued refinement of human health and environmental risk assessments.

二烷基二甲基氯化铵(DDAC)的毒理学见解和健康风险:一项综合综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书