Chenxiao Wu, Xueqiao Li, Chaoxiong Ye, Piia Astikainen
{"title":"Visuospatial working memory performance under emotional face distraction in non-athletes, team-sport athletes, and individual-sport athletes.","authors":"Chenxiao Wu, Xueqiao Li, Chaoxiong Ye, Piia Astikainen","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2026.2742975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sports expertise and emotional face distractors have both been examined in working memory (WM) research; however, little is known about whether visuospatial WM performance under emotional face distraction differs among non-athletes, team-sport athletes, and individual-sport athletes, or whether such effects vary across processing stages. This study addressed these questions in 71 young adults using a delayed-matching task. Angry and happy face distractors were presented during encoding, retrieval, or both stages. Accuracy and reaction time (RT) were analysed with mixed-design ANOVAs and Bayesian statistics. For accuracy, the overall distraction analysis showed no significant effects of distraction presence, participant type, or their interaction. Under distractor-present conditions, no significant main effect of distraction stage or participant type was found, whereas accuracy was slightly higher in happy-face than angry-face parts; interactions were non-significant. For RT, the overall distraction analysis showed slower responses in distractor than no-distractor conditions and a participant-type effect, although pairwise comparisons were non-significant. Under distractor-present conditions, only the distraction stage × distraction type interaction was significant, with longer RTs for happy than angry faces during retrieval. Supplementary analyses yielded a similar pattern. Collectively, the hypothesised group differences were not supported, and emotional face distractor effects were limited and stage- and index-dependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2026.2742975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sports expertise and emotional face distractors have both been examined in working memory (WM) research; however, little is known about whether visuospatial WM performance under emotional face distraction differs among non-athletes, team-sport athletes, and individual-sport athletes, or whether such effects vary across processing stages. This study addressed these questions in 71 young adults using a delayed-matching task. Angry and happy face distractors were presented during encoding, retrieval, or both stages. Accuracy and reaction time (RT) were analysed with mixed-design ANOVAs and Bayesian statistics. For accuracy, the overall distraction analysis showed no significant effects of distraction presence, participant type, or their interaction. Under distractor-present conditions, no significant main effect of distraction stage or participant type was found, whereas accuracy was slightly higher in happy-face than angry-face parts; interactions were non-significant. For RT, the overall distraction analysis showed slower responses in distractor than no-distractor conditions and a participant-type effect, although pairwise comparisons were non-significant. Under distractor-present conditions, only the distraction stage × distraction type interaction was significant, with longer RTs for happy than angry faces during retrieval. Supplementary analyses yielded a similar pattern. Collectively, the hypothesised group differences were not supported, and emotional face distractor effects were limited and stage- and index-dependent.
期刊介绍:
Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.