eHealth-Guided Exercise Improves Peak Oxygen Uptake and Health-Related Quality of Life After COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Espen Alexander Eriksen, Ulrik Wisløff, Ottar Brohaug Welde, Sindre Midttun, Eli Anne Skaug, Jon Magne Letnes, Ross Arena, Patrick Dunn, Tommi Vasankari, Torbjørn Omland, Dorthe Stensvold
{"title":"eHealth-Guided Exercise Improves Peak Oxygen Uptake and Health-Related Quality of Life After COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Espen Alexander Eriksen, Ulrik Wisløff, Ottar Brohaug Welde, Sindre Midttun, Eli Anne Skaug, Jon Magne Letnes, Ross Arena, Patrick Dunn, Tommi Vasankari, Torbjørn Omland, Dorthe Stensvold","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000004177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Physical activity (PA) levels declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, contributing to reduced fitness and quality of life. eHealth tools may help increase PA. In a six-month randomized controlled trial, we evaluated Activity Quotient (AQ), an innovative eHealth tool designed to promote PA and improve peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak), compared with standard advice on national PA recommendations in physically inactive adults recovering from COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-seven participants with previous COVID-19 infection were randomized 1:1 to either receive: 1) an eHealth-guided exercise intervention (n=38), using AQ to motivate for a PA dose that led to >100 weekly AQs, or 2) a control group (n=39) advised to follow standard PA recommendations. V̇O2peak scaled for fat-free mass (FFM) was the primary outcome, assessed in a subsample of participants who completed clinical assessment (n=33; eHealth group n=16, control n=17), while secondary outcomes included physical and mental scores of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effects of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (79% women) were 41.4±10.0 years and had a BMI of 28.8±5.9 kg/m². Among 33 participants who completed clinical assessment, V̇O2peak increased 4.9 mL•kgFFM -1•min -1 (95%CI 1.2 to 8.7, p=0.0134) more in the eHealth group compared with controls. Mental HRQoL increased by 9.8 points (95% CI 2.5 to 17.0, p=0.009) more in the eHealth group compared with controls. No between-group difference was observed in physical score of HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A six-month eHealth-guided exercise intervention using AQ was more effective than standard PA advice in improving V̇O2peak and mental HRQoL among physically inactive adults recovering from COVID-19. These findings highlight the potential of AQ as an effective and feasible approach for post-COVID rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000004177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Physical activity (PA) levels declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, contributing to reduced fitness and quality of life. eHealth tools may help increase PA. In a six-month randomized controlled trial, we evaluated Activity Quotient (AQ), an innovative eHealth tool designed to promote PA and improve peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak), compared with standard advice on national PA recommendations in physically inactive adults recovering from COVID-19.

Methods: Seventy-seven participants with previous COVID-19 infection were randomized 1:1 to either receive: 1) an eHealth-guided exercise intervention (n=38), using AQ to motivate for a PA dose that led to >100 weekly AQs, or 2) a control group (n=39) advised to follow standard PA recommendations. V̇O2peak scaled for fat-free mass (FFM) was the primary outcome, assessed in a subsample of participants who completed clinical assessment (n=33; eHealth group n=16, control n=17), while secondary outcomes included physical and mental scores of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effects of the intervention.

Results: Participants (79% women) were 41.4±10.0 years and had a BMI of 28.8±5.9 kg/m². Among 33 participants who completed clinical assessment, V̇O2peak increased 4.9 mL•kgFFM -1•min -1 (95%CI 1.2 to 8.7, p=0.0134) more in the eHealth group compared with controls. Mental HRQoL increased by 9.8 points (95% CI 2.5 to 17.0, p=0.009) more in the eHealth group compared with controls. No between-group difference was observed in physical score of HRQoL.

Conclusions: A six-month eHealth-guided exercise intervention using AQ was more effective than standard PA advice in improving V̇O2peak and mental HRQoL among physically inactive adults recovering from COVID-19. These findings highlight the potential of AQ as an effective and feasible approach for post-COVID rehabilitation.

一项随机对照试验:电子健康指导运动可改善COVID-19后的峰值摄氧量和健康相关生活质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书