Single-center experience in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Reema Mahmoud, Leonid Groysman, Shlomi Kleinman, Gilad Wasserman, Clariel Ianculovici, Oren Peleg, Amir Shuster
{"title":"Single-center experience in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.","authors":"Reema Mahmoud, Leonid Groysman, Shlomi Kleinman, Gilad Wasserman, Clariel Ianculovici, Oren Peleg, Amir Shuster","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2026.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious complication of antiresorptive therapy, yet optimal management remains controversial. The authors evaluated treatment outcomes, with an emphasis on the role of surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center, including patients treated for MRONJ from 2009 through 2025. Lesions were defined as improved if clinical downstaging occurred and as resolved if complete mucosal coverage without infection or exposed necrotic bone was achieved. Treatment modalities and outcomes were compared between osteoporosis- and oncology-associated MRONJ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 222 patients with MRONJ were analyzed: 139 had oncology-associated MRONJ (62.6%) and 83 had osteoporosis-associated MRONJ (37.4%). Oncology-associated MRONJ was more frequently managed conservatively with systemic antibiotics (21.6% vs 6.0%; P = .002), whereas patients with osteoporosis-associated MRONJ more often underwent surgical treatment (94.0% vs 78.4%; P = .002). Overall, 84.6% of patients improved and 69.4% achieved clinical resolution. Resolution was significantly higher in osteoporosis-associated MRONJ (80.7% vs 62.6%; P = .005). Surgical intervention was associated with favorable outcomes, accounting for 87.8% of improved cases and 94.2% of resolved cases (P < .001). Marginal mandibulectomy and partial maxillectomy were most associated with complete resolution (50.0% vs 22.1% in nonhealed cases; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical management was associated with improved outcomes in patients with MRONJ compared with conservative approaches. Prospective studies are required to confirm the optimal timing and extent of surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>A surgical approach may be considered an important option in the management of MRONJ in appropriately selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2026.06.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious complication of antiresorptive therapy, yet optimal management remains controversial. The authors evaluated treatment outcomes, with an emphasis on the role of surgical intervention.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center, including patients treated for MRONJ from 2009 through 2025. Lesions were defined as improved if clinical downstaging occurred and as resolved if complete mucosal coverage without infection or exposed necrotic bone was achieved. Treatment modalities and outcomes were compared between osteoporosis- and oncology-associated MRONJ.

Results: A total of 222 patients with MRONJ were analyzed: 139 had oncology-associated MRONJ (62.6%) and 83 had osteoporosis-associated MRONJ (37.4%). Oncology-associated MRONJ was more frequently managed conservatively with systemic antibiotics (21.6% vs 6.0%; P = .002), whereas patients with osteoporosis-associated MRONJ more often underwent surgical treatment (94.0% vs 78.4%; P = .002). Overall, 84.6% of patients improved and 69.4% achieved clinical resolution. Resolution was significantly higher in osteoporosis-associated MRONJ (80.7% vs 62.6%; P = .005). Surgical intervention was associated with favorable outcomes, accounting for 87.8% of improved cases and 94.2% of resolved cases (P < .001). Marginal mandibulectomy and partial maxillectomy were most associated with complete resolution (50.0% vs 22.1% in nonhealed cases; P < .001).

Conclusions: Surgical management was associated with improved outcomes in patients with MRONJ compared with conservative approaches. Prospective studies are required to confirm the optimal timing and extent of surgical intervention.

Practical implications: A surgical approach may be considered an important option in the management of MRONJ in appropriately selected patients.

单中心治疗药物相关性颌骨骨坏死的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Dental Association
Journal of the American Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书