A Survey and Analysis of the Current Status of MRI Safety Management in Medical Institutions in Korea.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chung-Hwan Kang, Kyoo-Jin Yeon, Yu-Jin Shin, Kyung-Bae Lee
{"title":"A Survey and Analysis of the Current Status of MRI Safety Management in Medical Institutions in Korea.","authors":"Chung-Hwan Kang, Kyoo-Jin Yeon, Yu-Jin Shin, Kyung-Bae Lee","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MRI safety management is essential for patient safety and for standardizing institutional practices. However, nationwide data on MRI safety readiness in Korean tertiary hospitals remain limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate MRI safety management across all 47 Korean tertiary hospitals and identify major gaps in safety infrastructure, staffing, and education.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Cross-sectional census survey.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>MRI safety managers from all 47 Korean tertiary hospitals in 2025.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>A structured 50-item questionnaire was developed based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) MRI safety guidelines. A composite safety maturity index (0-100) was calculated as the unweighted arithmetic mean of four domain scores derived from 32 binary safety-practice items, with mandatory items weighted 2 and recommended items weighted 1 in accordance with the 2024 ACR Manual on MR Safety.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Descriptive statistics were used to summarize institutional characteristics and safety compliance. Comparisons of staffing patterns by time period were evaluated using inferential tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 100% (47/47). The mean number of MRI units per hospital was 5.32 ± 3.50, and 3.0 T systems were predominant. Compliance was universal for closed-circuit television (CCTV) monitoring and MR Conditional monitoring devices but was low for ferromagnetic detection systems (17.0%), Magnetic Resonance Safety Officer (MRSO) appointment (17.0%), and Level 1 safety education (23.4%). MRI-related safety incidents were reported by 44.7% of hospitals. Two-person staffing decreased significantly from 97.9% on weekday daytime hours to 55.3% on Saturdays, 44.7% at night, and 38.3% on holidays. The overall composite safety maturity score was 63.08 ± 15.04.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Considerable variability remains in MRI safety management across Korean tertiary hospitals. These findings highlight the need for national MRI safety standards in the Republic of Korea.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>4.</p><p><strong>Technical efficacy: </strong>Stage 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MRI safety management is essential for patient safety and for standardizing institutional practices. However, nationwide data on MRI safety readiness in Korean tertiary hospitals remain limited.

Purpose: To evaluate MRI safety management across all 47 Korean tertiary hospitals and identify major gaps in safety infrastructure, staffing, and education.

Study type: Cross-sectional census survey.

Population: MRI safety managers from all 47 Korean tertiary hospitals in 2025.

Assessment: A structured 50-item questionnaire was developed based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) MRI safety guidelines. A composite safety maturity index (0-100) was calculated as the unweighted arithmetic mean of four domain scores derived from 32 binary safety-practice items, with mandatory items weighted 2 and recommended items weighted 1 in accordance with the 2024 ACR Manual on MR Safety.

Statistical tests: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize institutional characteristics and safety compliance. Comparisons of staffing patterns by time period were evaluated using inferential tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: The response rate was 100% (47/47). The mean number of MRI units per hospital was 5.32 ± 3.50, and 3.0 T systems were predominant. Compliance was universal for closed-circuit television (CCTV) monitoring and MR Conditional monitoring devices but was low for ferromagnetic detection systems (17.0%), Magnetic Resonance Safety Officer (MRSO) appointment (17.0%), and Level 1 safety education (23.4%). MRI-related safety incidents were reported by 44.7% of hospitals. Two-person staffing decreased significantly from 97.9% on weekday daytime hours to 55.3% on Saturdays, 44.7% at night, and 38.3% on holidays. The overall composite safety maturity score was 63.08 ± 15.04.

Data conclusion: Considerable variability remains in MRI safety management across Korean tertiary hospitals. These findings highlight the need for national MRI safety standards in the Republic of Korea.

Evidence level: 4.

Technical efficacy: Stage 4.

韩国医疗机构MRI安全管理现状调查与分析
背景:MRI安全管理对患者安全和规范机构实践至关重要。然而,关于韩国三级医院核磁共振安全准备情况的全国性数据仍然有限。目的:评估韩国所有47家三级医院的MRI安全管理,并确定安全基础设施、人员配备和教育方面的主要差距。研究类型:横断面普查调查。人口:2025年韩国全部47家三级医院的MRI安全管理人员。评估:根据美国放射学会(ACR) MRI安全指南制定了一份结构化的50项问卷。综合安全成熟度指数(0-100)是由32个二进制安全实践项目得出的四个领域得分的未加权算术平均值,其中强制性项目权重为2,推荐项目权重为1,根据2024年ACR MR安全手册计算。统计检验:使用描述性统计来总结机构特征和安全符合性。采用推理检验评估各时间段人员配置模式的比较,统计学显著性设置为p。结果:应答率为100%(47/47)。每所医院平均MRI台数为5.32±3.50台,以3.0台为主。闭路电视(CCTV)监测和磁共振条件监测设备的符合性普遍存在,但铁磁检测系统(17.0%)、磁共振安全主任(17.0%)任命和一级安全教育(23.4%)的符合性较低。44.7%的医院报告了与核磁共振相关的安全事故。两名员工从工作日白天的97.9%大幅下降到星期六的55.3%、晚上的44.7%和节假日的38.3%。综合安全成熟度评分为63.08±15.04分。数据结论:韩国三级医院的MRI安全管理仍然存在相当大的差异。这些发现强调了韩国需要制定国家核磁共振安全标准。证据等级:4。技术功效:第4阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书