Effects of mRNA Vaccination on the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Turker Emre, Fatoş Mete
{"title":"Effects of mRNA Vaccination on the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Turker Emre, Fatoş Mete","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2026.260204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, developed using a novel technology distinct from conventional vaccines, were widely administered. Compared to classical vaccines, mRNA vaccines are known to induce more pronounced immune responses. This study aimed to investigate whether mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines accelerate the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 patients with chronic kidney disease who were followed at Bursa City Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were recorded at three different time points: the pre-vaccination period (-24 months), the vaccination period, and the post-vaccination period (+24 months). Glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Due to the dependent nature of pre- and post-vaccination comparisons, the paired t-test was used for parametric data, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for nonparametric data. Furthermore, we applied a One-Way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc correction for intergroup comparisons. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When stratified by vaccine type, all three subgroups (BioNTech-only, ınactivated-only, and mixed vaccination) exhibited significant within-group declines in eGFR and elevations in serum creatinine (p < 0.001 for all). Importantly, inter-group comparison using post-hoc analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the magnitude of renal function change (delta eGFR or delta creatinine) between the different vaccine types (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this five-year retrospective cohort study indicate that neither mRNA-based nor inactivated COVID-19 vaccines accelerate the progression of chronic kidney disease. These results support the renal safety of both vaccine types in patients with chronic kidney disease and may help reduce concerns about vaccination-related deterioration in kidney function in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"72 10","pages":"2293-2299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2026.260204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, developed using a novel technology distinct from conventional vaccines, were widely administered. Compared to classical vaccines, mRNA vaccines are known to induce more pronounced immune responses. This study aimed to investigate whether mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines accelerate the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: A total of 140 patients with chronic kidney disease who were followed at Bursa City Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were recorded at three different time points: the pre-vaccination period (-24 months), the vaccination period, and the post-vaccination period (+24 months). Glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Due to the dependent nature of pre- and post-vaccination comparisons, the paired t-test was used for parametric data, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for nonparametric data. Furthermore, we applied a One-Way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc correction for intergroup comparisons. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: When stratified by vaccine type, all three subgroups (BioNTech-only, ınactivated-only, and mixed vaccination) exhibited significant within-group declines in eGFR and elevations in serum creatinine (p < 0.001 for all). Importantly, inter-group comparison using post-hoc analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the magnitude of renal function change (delta eGFR or delta creatinine) between the different vaccine types (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The findings of this five-year retrospective cohort study indicate that neither mRNA-based nor inactivated COVID-19 vaccines accelerate the progression of chronic kidney disease. These results support the renal safety of both vaccine types in patients with chronic kidney disease and may help reduce concerns about vaccination-related deterioration in kidney function in this vulnerable population.

mRNA接种对慢性肾脏疾病进展的影响。
导语:在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗得到了广泛接种,该疫苗采用一种不同于传统疫苗的新技术开发。与传统疫苗相比,mRNA疫苗已知能诱导更明显的免疫反应。本研究旨在探讨mRNA和COVID-19灭活疫苗是否会加速慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的进展。方法:回顾性分析在布尔萨市医院随访的140例慢性肾病患者的临床资料。在接种前(-24个月)、接种期和接种后(+24个月)三个不同时间点记录血清肌酐水平和肾小球滤过率(eGFR)值。肾小球滤过率采用慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)方程计算。由于疫苗接种前后比较的依赖性,对参数数据采用配对t检验,对非参数数据采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。此外,我们采用Bonferroni事后校正的单因素方差分析进行组间比较。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:当按疫苗类型分层时,所有三个亚组(biontechnology, ınactivated-only和混合疫苗)均表现出组内eGFR显著下降和血清肌酐升高(均p < 0.001)。重要的是,采用事后分析的组间比较显示,不同疫苗类型之间肾功能改变的幅度(eGFR或肌酐)无统计学差异(p < 0.05)。结论:这项为期五年的回顾性队列研究结果表明,基于mrna的COVID-19灭活疫苗和疫苗都不会加速慢性肾脏疾病的进展。这些结果支持两种疫苗在慢性肾脏疾病患者中的肾脏安全性,并可能有助于减少对这一易感人群中疫苗相关肾功能恶化的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书