Prevalence and predictors of use of mental health and well-being support among healthcare workers in England: findings from NHS CHECK.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Brendan Dempsey, Pamela Almeida-Meza, Bethany Croak, Danielle Lamb, Neil Greenberg, Ira Madan, Rosalind Raine, Anne Marie Rafferty, Rupa Bhundia, Simon Wessely, Sharon A M Stevelink
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of use of mental health and well-being support among healthcare workers in England: findings from NHS CHECK.","authors":"Brendan Dempsey, Pamela Almeida-Meza, Bethany Croak, Danielle Lamb, Neil Greenberg, Ira Madan, Rosalind Raine, Anne Marie Rafferty, Rupa Bhundia, Simon Wessely, Sharon A M Stevelink","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2026.12108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare can be a demanding career, and there is a rising interest in fostering the well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine self-reported use of mental health and well-being support available to HCWs and explore predictors of use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected by a longitudinal cohort study. The baseline survey was distributed from April 2020, followed by three surveys at 6 months (time 1; <i>n</i> = 10 514), 12 months (time 2; <i>n</i> = 10 429) and 32 months (time 3; <i>n</i> = 6382) post baseline. Use of mental health support (e.g. therapy) was assessed at each follow-up, and 96 supports were measured at time 1 only. Multilevel regression modelling was used to explore baseline predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At time 1, we developed seven support categories. Practical supports (e.g. free or discounted food or parking) were the most commonly used (58%), whereas employee assistance programmes were least commonly used (5%). Furthermore, 21% of HCWs reported never using any support. Mental health support access varied: 23% of participants had used support before August 2021 (time 1), 17% between March 2020 and January 2022 (time 2), and 21% between February 2022 and May 2023 (time 3). HCWs who were male, older and/or of Asian ethnicity had lower odds of accessing support, whereas those who reported symptoms of common mental disorders at baseline had higher odds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most HCWs (79%) reported having accessed some support, whereas 21% had not. Practical and informal supports were most used, whereas uptake of employee assistance programmes was low. Future research should explore and address barriers faced by male, older, Asian and non-permanent staff to improve access and, in turn, the well-being, performance and patient care of these individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"12 6","pages":"e253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.12108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare can be a demanding career, and there is a rising interest in fostering the well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs).

Aims: To examine self-reported use of mental health and well-being support available to HCWs and explore predictors of use.

Method: Data were collected by a longitudinal cohort study. The baseline survey was distributed from April 2020, followed by three surveys at 6 months (time 1; n = 10 514), 12 months (time 2; n = 10 429) and 32 months (time 3; n = 6382) post baseline. Use of mental health support (e.g. therapy) was assessed at each follow-up, and 96 supports were measured at time 1 only. Multilevel regression modelling was used to explore baseline predictors.

Results: At time 1, we developed seven support categories. Practical supports (e.g. free or discounted food or parking) were the most commonly used (58%), whereas employee assistance programmes were least commonly used (5%). Furthermore, 21% of HCWs reported never using any support. Mental health support access varied: 23% of participants had used support before August 2021 (time 1), 17% between March 2020 and January 2022 (time 2), and 21% between February 2022 and May 2023 (time 3). HCWs who were male, older and/or of Asian ethnicity had lower odds of accessing support, whereas those who reported symptoms of common mental disorders at baseline had higher odds.

Conclusions: Most HCWs (79%) reported having accessed some support, whereas 21% had not. Practical and informal supports were most used, whereas uptake of employee assistance programmes was low. Future research should explore and address barriers faced by male, older, Asian and non-permanent staff to improve access and, in turn, the well-being, performance and patient care of these individuals.

英国卫生保健工作者使用心理健康和福祉支持的患病率和预测因素:来自NHS CHECK的调查结果
背景:医疗保健可能是一个要求很高的职业,人们对培养医疗工作者(HCWs)的福祉越来越感兴趣。目的:调查自我报告的心理健康和健康支持的使用情况,并探索使用的预测因素。方法:采用纵向队列研究方法收集资料。基线调查从2020年4月开始分布,随后在基线后6个月(时间1,n = 10 514)、12个月(时间2,n = 10 429)和32个月(时间3,n = 6382)进行了3次调查。在每次随访时评估心理健康支持(如治疗)的使用情况,仅在第1次随访时测量了96项支持。采用多水平回归模型探索基线预测因子。结果:在时间1,我们开发了7个支持类别。实际支持(例如免费或打折的食物或停车位)是最常用的(58%),而员工援助计划最不常用(5%)。此外,21%的医护人员报告从未使用过任何支持。获得心理健康支持的机会各不相同:23%的参与者在2021年8月(时间1)之前使用过支持,17%在2020年3月至2022年1月(时间2)之间使用过支持,21%在2022年2月至2023年5月(时间3)之间使用过支持。男性、年龄较大和/或亚洲族裔的卫生保健工作者获得支持的几率较低,而基线时报告有常见精神障碍症状的卫生保健工作者获得支持的几率较高。结论:大多数医护人员(79%)报告获得了一些支持,而21%没有。实际和非正式的支助是最常用的,而雇员援助方案的使用率很低。未来的研究应该探索和解决男性、老年、亚洲和非常任工作人员面临的障碍,以改善这些人的健康、表现和病人护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书