Telmisartan-Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination at Two Chlorthalidone Dose Levels versus Telmisartan in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Phase III Trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Seung-Whan Lee, Jin-Man Cho, Soon Jun Hong, Seung Hwan Han, Gyu Chul Oh, Seong Hwan Kim, Jung-Hoon Sung, Sang-Rok Lee, Gyung-Min Park, Hyun-Jae Kang, Jun-Hee Lee, Ji-Yong Choi, Kyung Hee Lim, Cheol Ung Choi, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Sang-Hyun Kim, In-Ho Chae
{"title":"Telmisartan-Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination at Two Chlorthalidone Dose Levels versus Telmisartan in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Phase III Trial.","authors":"Seung-Whan Lee, Jin-Man Cho, Soon Jun Hong, Seung Hwan Han, Gyu Chul Oh, Seong Hwan Kim, Jung-Hoon Sung, Sang-Rok Lee, Gyung-Min Park, Hyun-Jae Kang, Jun-Hee Lee, Ji-Yong Choi, Kyung Hee Lim, Cheol Ung Choi, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Sang-Hyun Kim, In-Ho Chae","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpag081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence comparing different diuretic doses within fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) remains limited. We evaluated telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs according to chlorthalidone dose in patients with blood pressure (BP) inadequately controlled on telmisartan monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind trial, 254 patients with uncontrolled BP [sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 and <180 mmHg; sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <110 mmHg] after a telmisartan run-in period were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs (40/12.5 or 40/6.25 mg), or telmisartan 40 mg for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in sitting SBP from baseline to Week 8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At Week 8, telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs demonstrated greater reductions in sitting SBP compared with telmisartan monotherapy: least-squares mean differences were -9.5 mmHg [95% CI, -13.5 to - 5.6] for the 40/12.5 mg and -6.1 mmHg [95% CI, -10.4 to - 1.9] for the 40/6.25 mg. BP control rates (target BP: SBP/DBP <140/90 mmHg, or < 130/80 mmHg in patients with albuminuric chronic kidney disease or established cardiovascular disease) at Week 8 also favored telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs over telmisartan monotherapy (53.2% for the 40/12.5 mg and 43.0% for the 40/6.25 mg versus 32.9% for telmisartan 40 mg). Safety profiles were comparable among treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients inadequately controlled on telmisartan alone, FDCs of telmisartan with two different doses of chlorthalidone provided greater BP reduction than telmisartan monotherapy without increased safety risk, supporting its role as an effective and well-tolerated treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpag081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence comparing different diuretic doses within fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) remains limited. We evaluated telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs according to chlorthalidone dose in patients with blood pressure (BP) inadequately controlled on telmisartan monotherapy.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind trial, 254 patients with uncontrolled BP [sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 and <180 mmHg; sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <110 mmHg] after a telmisartan run-in period were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs (40/12.5 or 40/6.25 mg), or telmisartan 40 mg for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in sitting SBP from baseline to Week 8.

Results: At Week 8, telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs demonstrated greater reductions in sitting SBP compared with telmisartan monotherapy: least-squares mean differences were -9.5 mmHg [95% CI, -13.5 to - 5.6] for the 40/12.5 mg and -6.1 mmHg [95% CI, -10.4 to - 1.9] for the 40/6.25 mg. BP control rates (target BP: SBP/DBP <140/90 mmHg, or < 130/80 mmHg in patients with albuminuric chronic kidney disease or established cardiovascular disease) at Week 8 also favored telmisartan/chlorthalidone FDCs over telmisartan monotherapy (53.2% for the 40/12.5 mg and 43.0% for the 40/6.25 mg versus 32.9% for telmisartan 40 mg). Safety profiles were comparable among treatment groups.

Conclusions: In patients inadequately controlled on telmisartan alone, FDCs of telmisartan with two different doses of chlorthalidone provided greater BP reduction than telmisartan monotherapy without increased safety risk, supporting its role as an effective and well-tolerated treatment option.

替米沙坦-氯噻酮固定剂量联合使用两种氯噻酮剂量水平与替米沙坦治疗不受控制的高血压:一项III期试验。
背景:在固定剂量组合(fdc)中比较不同利尿剂剂量的证据仍然有限。在替米沙坦单药治疗血压控制不充分的患者中,我们根据氯thalidone剂量评估替米沙坦/氯thalidone fdc。方法:在这项随机双盲试验中,254例血压不受控制的患者[坐位收缩压(SBP)≥140]。结果:在第8周,替米沙坦/氯噻酮FDCs与替米沙坦单药治疗相比,坐位收缩压降低更大:40/12.5 mg组最小二乘平均差异为-9.5 mmHg [95% CI, -13.5至- 5.6],40/6.25 mg组为-6.1 mmHg [95% CI, -10.4至- 1.9]。结论:在单独使用替米沙坦控制不充分的患者中,替米沙坦与两种不同剂量氯噻酮的fdc比替米沙坦单药治疗更能降低血压,且不增加安全风险,支持其作为有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书