Non-Linear U-Shaped Trend Associations between HbA1c and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Fengquan Shi, Kaiqiang Xi
{"title":"Non-Linear U-Shaped Trend Associations between HbA1c and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality.","authors":"Fengquan Shi, Kaiqiang Xi","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.251013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several well-designed prospective studies have assessed the association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and mortality risk in both the general population and diabetic patients. However, the results have been inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study using data from NHANES 2003 - 2018, which included 38,072 adults. Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic spline models were used to evaluate the linear and non-linear associations between HbA1c and both all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality. To better detect non-linear relationships, we converted HbA1c from a continuous to a categorical variable. Kaplan-Meier survival cur-ves and subgroup analyses were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During an average follow-up period of 99.7 ± 53.6 months, 4,723 participants (12.4%) died. We observed a significant non-linear U-shaped association between baseline HbA1c levels and mortality. Compared with a moderate HbA1c level of 5.5%, the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality decreased for HbA1c values below 5.5%. However, mortality risk significantly increased for HbA1c levels above 5.5%. This indicates that individuals with either low or high HbA1c levels are at a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Additionally, we identified an L-shaped trend in cancer mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated a U-shaped association between baseline HbA1c levels and all-cause mortality in the general population. Individuals with both low and high HbA1c levels are at a greater risk of all-cause mortality. Future clinical trials on diabetes management should consider the consequences of lower HbA1c levels, especially across different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"72 10","pages":"2211-2220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.251013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several well-designed prospective studies have assessed the association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and mortality risk in both the general population and diabetic patients. However, the results have been inconsistent.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study using data from NHANES 2003 - 2018, which included 38,072 adults. Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic spline models were used to evaluate the linear and non-linear associations between HbA1c and both all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality. To better detect non-linear relationships, we converted HbA1c from a continuous to a categorical variable. Kaplan-Meier survival cur-ves and subgroup analyses were also performed.

Results: During an average follow-up period of 99.7 ± 53.6 months, 4,723 participants (12.4%) died. We observed a significant non-linear U-shaped association between baseline HbA1c levels and mortality. Compared with a moderate HbA1c level of 5.5%, the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality decreased for HbA1c values below 5.5%. However, mortality risk significantly increased for HbA1c levels above 5.5%. This indicates that individuals with either low or high HbA1c levels are at a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Additionally, we identified an L-shaped trend in cancer mortality.

Conclusions: We demonstrated a U-shaped association between baseline HbA1c levels and all-cause mortality in the general population. Individuals with both low and high HbA1c levels are at a greater risk of all-cause mortality. Future clinical trials on diabetes management should consider the consequences of lower HbA1c levels, especially across different populations.

HbA1c与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率之间的非线性u型趋势关系
背景:几项设计良好的前瞻性研究评估了普通人群和糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)与死亡风险之间的关系。然而,结果却不一致。方法:我们使用NHANES 2003 - 2018年的数据进行了一项前瞻性研究,其中包括38,072名成年人。Cox比例风险回归和限制三次样条模型用于评估HbA1c与全因死亡率和病因特异性死亡率之间的线性和非线性关系。为了更好地检测非线性关系,我们将HbA1c从连续变量转换为分类变量。还进行了Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和亚组分析。结果:在平均99.7±53.6个月的随访期间,4723人(12.4%)死亡。我们观察到基线HbA1c水平与死亡率之间存在显著的非线性u型关联。与中度HbA1c水平5.5%相比,当HbA1c低于5.5%时,全因和病因特异性死亡风险降低。然而,当HbA1c水平高于5.5%时,死亡风险显著增加。这表明HbA1c水平低或高的个体全因死亡的风险更高。此外,我们发现癌症死亡率呈l型趋势。结论:我们证明了在一般人群中,基线HbA1c水平与全因死亡率之间呈u型相关性。HbA1c水平低或高的个体全因死亡的风险更高。未来关于糖尿病管理的临床试验应该考虑降低HbA1c水平的后果,特别是在不同的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书