Yongxuan Gao, Zhengkai Wei, Ruiting Shi, Puteri Nuraqidah Abdul Razak, Fakir Mohamad Md Nor
{"title":"Why can't they stop playing? Relative deprivation and problematic Otome game behavior among adult women.","authors":"Yongxuan Gao, Zhengkai Wei, Ruiting Shi, Puteri Nuraqidah Abdul Razak, Fakir Mohamad Md Nor","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the associations between relative deprivation and problematic Otome game behavior among adult female players, test the parallel mediating roles of player-character attachment and maladaptive cognition, and examine the separate moderating role of trait mindfulness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 433 Chinese adult female Otome gamers recruited through snowball sampling on Xiaohongshu and Weibo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative deprivation was positively associated with problematic Otome game behavior, and both player-character attachment and maladaptive cognition showed significant indirect associations. Trait mindfulness was positively correlated with maladaptive cognition (r = 0.417) and problematic Otome game behavior (r = 0.510), whereas negative RD × TM interactions indicated that the positive RD-related associations with player-character attachment, maladaptive cognition, and problematic Otome game behavior became weaker as trait mindfulness increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that problematic Otome game behavior may be associated with both player-character involvement and maladaptive gaming cognition. The mindfulness interactions indicate attenuation of RD-related slopes rather than a generally protective association of higher mindfulness. Given the cross-sectional and non-probability sampling design, causal interpretations should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"270 ","pages":"107968"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine the associations between relative deprivation and problematic Otome game behavior among adult female players, test the parallel mediating roles of player-character attachment and maladaptive cognition, and examine the separate moderating role of trait mindfulness.
Method: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 433 Chinese adult female Otome gamers recruited through snowball sampling on Xiaohongshu and Weibo.
Results: Relative deprivation was positively associated with problematic Otome game behavior, and both player-character attachment and maladaptive cognition showed significant indirect associations. Trait mindfulness was positively correlated with maladaptive cognition (r = 0.417) and problematic Otome game behavior (r = 0.510), whereas negative RD × TM interactions indicated that the positive RD-related associations with player-character attachment, maladaptive cognition, and problematic Otome game behavior became weaker as trait mindfulness increased.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that problematic Otome game behavior may be associated with both player-character involvement and maladaptive gaming cognition. The mindfulness interactions indicate attenuation of RD-related slopes rather than a generally protective association of higher mindfulness. Given the cross-sectional and non-probability sampling design, causal interpretations should be avoided.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.