A Quantitative Framework for Quality Assessment of Simulated Microgravity for Biological Systems: Biological Microgravity Evaluation Framework (BMEF)

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Parikshit Roychowdhury, Mirunalini Gobinath, Asanta Chandra, Galina Yu Vassilieva, Sohom Ghosh, Suvro Chatterjee, Phalke Pratik Kiran, Gowthamarajan Kuppusamy
{"title":"A Quantitative Framework for Quality Assessment of Simulated Microgravity for Biological Systems: Biological Microgravity Evaluation Framework (BMEF)","authors":"Parikshit Roychowdhury,&nbsp;Mirunalini Gobinath,&nbsp;Asanta Chandra,&nbsp;Galina Yu Vassilieva,&nbsp;Sohom Ghosh,&nbsp;Suvro Chatterjee,&nbsp;Phalke Pratik Kiran,&nbsp;Gowthamarajan Kuppusamy","doi":"10.1007/s12217-026-10292-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, 2 dimensional and 3-dimensional clinostats (2D and 3D Clinostats), random positioning machines (RPMs) and other ground-based simulation techniques are very important tools for space biology research. However, their performance and validity are almost always assessed by observations or isolated parameters that often inadequately explain the mechanical microenvironment experienced by biological samples like cells and tissues. This leads to lack of uniformity and reproducibility specially in the case of biological experiments. The cells might act differently within same conditions of simulated microgravity in different experiments due to lack of a standardised quantitative framework to asses every aspect of simulated microgravity beyond vector averaging. In this study we compute Biological Microgravity Evaluation Framework (BMEF), which is a comprehensive computational step by step method to evaluate mechanical stability, directional isotropy, vector orientation coverage and biologically relevant exposure generated during a simulated microgravity study. In this current study we have used a 3D clinostat with partial RPM features, where the inner frame changed its orientation randomly within a 10 s timeframe. Acceleration data through a 3-axis accelerometer, at 24 min, 48 min, 96 min and 120 min was obtained and gravity vector dynamics were characterised. This quantitative framework combines available physical parameters, resultant mechanical loading, Directional Bias Vector (DBV), Orientation Coverage Index (OCI), and Orientation Uniformity Index (OUI) with novel biologically relevant parameters, Mechanical Quality Score (MQS), Effective Isotropic Exposure Time (EIET) to generate a Biological Microgravity Quality Index (BMQI). We observed that orientation of sampling became denser with duration of experiments and EIET increased proportionally with exposure duration while BMQI converged rapidly in the initial phase of the study then remained stable thereafter. This framework is intended to provide a quantitative descriptor of mechanical exposure conditions for future biological experiments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":707,"journal":{"name":"Microgravity Science and Technology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12217-026-10292-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microgravity Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12217-026-10292-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, 2 dimensional and 3-dimensional clinostats (2D and 3D Clinostats), random positioning machines (RPMs) and other ground-based simulation techniques are very important tools for space biology research. However, their performance and validity are almost always assessed by observations or isolated parameters that often inadequately explain the mechanical microenvironment experienced by biological samples like cells and tissues. This leads to lack of uniformity and reproducibility specially in the case of biological experiments. The cells might act differently within same conditions of simulated microgravity in different experiments due to lack of a standardised quantitative framework to asses every aspect of simulated microgravity beyond vector averaging. In this study we compute Biological Microgravity Evaluation Framework (BMEF), which is a comprehensive computational step by step method to evaluate mechanical stability, directional isotropy, vector orientation coverage and biologically relevant exposure generated during a simulated microgravity study. In this current study we have used a 3D clinostat with partial RPM features, where the inner frame changed its orientation randomly within a 10 s timeframe. Acceleration data through a 3-axis accelerometer, at 24 min, 48 min, 96 min and 120 min was obtained and gravity vector dynamics were characterised. This quantitative framework combines available physical parameters, resultant mechanical loading, Directional Bias Vector (DBV), Orientation Coverage Index (OCI), and Orientation Uniformity Index (OUI) with novel biologically relevant parameters, Mechanical Quality Score (MQS), Effective Isotropic Exposure Time (EIET) to generate a Biological Microgravity Quality Index (BMQI). We observed that orientation of sampling became denser with duration of experiments and EIET increased proportionally with exposure duration while BMQI converged rapidly in the initial phase of the study then remained stable thereafter. This framework is intended to provide a quantitative descriptor of mechanical exposure conditions for future biological experiments.

生物系统模拟微重力质量评价的定量框架:生物微重力评价框架(BMEF)
目前,二维和三维回转器(2D和3D回转器)、随机定位机(rpm)等地面仿真技术是空间生物学研究的重要工具。然而,它们的性能和有效性几乎总是通过观察或孤立的参数来评估,这些参数往往不能充分解释细胞和组织等生物样品所经历的机械微环境。这导致缺乏一致性和可重复性,特别是在生物实验的情况下。由于缺乏一个标准化的定量框架来评估模拟微重力的各个方面,因此在不同的实验中,在相同的模拟微重力条件下,细胞的行为可能会有所不同。在本研究中,我们计算了生物微重力评估框架(BMEF),这是一种综合的计算方法,用于评估模拟微重力研究过程中产生的机械稳定性、方向各向同性、矢量方向覆盖和生物相关暴露。在目前的研究中,我们使用了一个具有部分RPM特征的3D回转器,其中内框架在10秒的时间框架内随机改变其方向。通过3轴加速度计获得24 min、48 min、96 min和120 min的加速度数据,并表征重力矢量动力学。该定量框架将可用的物理参数、机械载荷、定向偏置向量(DBV)、定向覆盖指数(OCI)和定向均匀性指数(OUI)与新的生物相关参数、机械质量分数(MQS)、有效各向同性暴露时间(EIET)结合起来,生成生物微重力质量指数(BMQI)。我们观察到,随着实验时间的延长,采样方向变得更密集,EIET随着暴露时间的延长成比例地增加,而BMQI在研究开始阶段迅速收敛,之后保持稳定。该框架旨在为未来的生物学实验提供机械暴露条件的定量描述符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microgravity Science and Technology
Microgravity Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
44.40%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Microgravity Science and Technology – An International Journal for Microgravity and Space Exploration Related Research is a is a peer-reviewed scientific journal concerned with all topics, experimental as well as theoretical, related to research carried out under conditions of altered gravity. Microgravity Science and Technology publishes papers dealing with studies performed on and prepared for platforms that provide real microgravity conditions (such as drop towers, parabolic flights, sounding rockets, reentry capsules and orbiting platforms), and on ground-based facilities aiming to simulate microgravity conditions on earth (such as levitrons, clinostats, random positioning machines, bed rest facilities, and micro-scale or neutral buoyancy facilities) or providing artificial gravity conditions (such as centrifuges). Data from preparatory tests, hardware and instrumentation developments, lessons learnt as well as theoretical gravity-related considerations are welcome. Included science disciplines with gravity-related topics are: − materials science − fluid mechanics − process engineering − physics − chemistry − heat and mass transfer − gravitational biology − radiation biology − exobiology and astrobiology − human physiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书