Early Upper Palaeolithic personal ornaments from Foradada cave (Xàbia, Alacant, Eastern Iberia)

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Oriol Montero-Buch, Ester Verdún-Castelló, Magdalena Gómez-Puche, Josep A. Casabó, Javier Fernández-López de Pablo
{"title":"Early Upper Palaeolithic personal ornaments from Foradada cave (Xàbia, Alacant, Eastern Iberia)","authors":"Oriol Montero-Buch,&nbsp;Ester Verdún-Castelló,&nbsp;Magdalena Gómez-Puche,&nbsp;Josep A. Casabó,&nbsp;Javier Fernández-López de Pablo","doi":"10.1007/s12520-026-02555-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Personal ornamentation constitutes an essential proxy for addressing symbolic behaviour and technological complexity in Early Upper Palaeolithic hunter-gatherer groups, encompassing raw material collection, environmental understanding, technological capacities, use, and discard. As a primary representative element for modern humans arriving in Europe, particularly on the Iberian Peninsula, personal ornaments are crucial for investigating their technological knowledge and non‑utilitarian practices. Functional analysis of these assemblages is therefore vital, yet such studies remain relatively scarce. We present a comprehensive analysis of the personal ornaments from Foradada cave which has been subdivided in three different assemblages –Early Upper Palaeolithic, mixed Upper Palaeolithic and Holocene– according to stratigraphic and contextual criteria. The study of thirty-five finished ornaments, alongside elements related to technical failures and raw material accumulation, reveals a broad selection of materials, ranging from terrestrial mammal teeth to marine and freshwater mollusc shells. A combined technological and traceological approach was essential for characterising their manufacture, use, and discard. Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy analysis has identified evidence of colour modification technology, marking one of its earliest documented uses during the Early Upper Palaeolithic in the Iberian Peninsula. Additionally, comparison with nearby regional ornamental assemblages demonstrates clear similarities between them, potentially pointing to shared social networks and ethno‑cultural identities. Consequently, we argue that the Foradada assemblage is a significant collection of personal ornaments on the Iberian Peninsula during the Early Upper Palaeolithic. Finally, we assess the potential value of integrating techno‑functional and spectroscopic methods in personal ornament analysis as a way to add evidence on hunter-gatherer procurement strategies and their relationship with the environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-026-02555-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal ornamentation constitutes an essential proxy for addressing symbolic behaviour and technological complexity in Early Upper Palaeolithic hunter-gatherer groups, encompassing raw material collection, environmental understanding, technological capacities, use, and discard. As a primary representative element for modern humans arriving in Europe, particularly on the Iberian Peninsula, personal ornaments are crucial for investigating their technological knowledge and non‑utilitarian practices. Functional analysis of these assemblages is therefore vital, yet such studies remain relatively scarce. We present a comprehensive analysis of the personal ornaments from Foradada cave which has been subdivided in three different assemblages –Early Upper Palaeolithic, mixed Upper Palaeolithic and Holocene– according to stratigraphic and contextual criteria. The study of thirty-five finished ornaments, alongside elements related to technical failures and raw material accumulation, reveals a broad selection of materials, ranging from terrestrial mammal teeth to marine and freshwater mollusc shells. A combined technological and traceological approach was essential for characterising their manufacture, use, and discard. Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy analysis has identified evidence of colour modification technology, marking one of its earliest documented uses during the Early Upper Palaeolithic in the Iberian Peninsula. Additionally, comparison with nearby regional ornamental assemblages demonstrates clear similarities between them, potentially pointing to shared social networks and ethno‑cultural identities. Consequently, we argue that the Foradada assemblage is a significant collection of personal ornaments on the Iberian Peninsula during the Early Upper Palaeolithic. Finally, we assess the potential value of integrating techno‑functional and spectroscopic methods in personal ornament analysis as a way to add evidence on hunter-gatherer procurement strategies and their relationship with the environment.

旧石器时代早期晚期Foradada洞穴的个人装饰品(Xàbia, Alacant,东伊比利亚)
在旧石器时代早期晚期的狩猎采集者群体中,个人装饰是解决符号行为和技术复杂性的重要代表,包括原材料收集、环境理解、技术能力、使用和丢弃。作为现代人类抵达欧洲的主要代表元素,尤其是在伊比利亚半岛,个人饰品对于调查他们的技术知识和非功利主义行为至关重要。因此,对这些组合的功能分析是至关重要的,但这类研究仍然相对较少。根据地层和文脉标准,我们对Foradada洞穴的个人饰品进行了综合分析,并将其细分为三个不同的组合-早期上旧石器时代,混合上旧石器时代和全新世。对35件成品饰品的研究,以及与技术故障和原材料积累相关的元素,揭示了广泛的材料选择,从陆地哺乳动物的牙齿到海洋和淡水软体动物的贝壳。结合技术和追溯方法是表征它们的制造、使用和丢弃的必要条件。此外,拉曼光谱分析已经确定了颜色修饰技术的证据,标志着伊比利亚半岛旧石器时代早期早期最早的记录使用之一。此外,与附近区域装饰组合的比较表明它们之间存在明显的相似性,可能指向共享的社会网络和民族文化身份。因此,我们认为Foradada组合是旧石器时代早期伊比利亚半岛上重要的个人装饰品集合。最后,我们评估了在个人饰品分析中整合技术功能和光谱方法的潜在价值,作为一种增加狩猎采集者采购策略及其与环境关系证据的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书