Quantitative identification of flaking techniques using Bulb Surface Angle (BSA) derived from 3D surface data

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Kenji Nagai
{"title":"Quantitative identification of flaking techniques using Bulb Surface Angle (BSA) derived from 3D surface data","authors":"Kenji Nagai","doi":"10.1007/s12520-026-02561-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying flaking techniques used in blade production is a fundamental challenge in lithic analysis because morphological attributes often overlap among different production methods, limiting the reliability of traditional classifications. This study evaluates a quantitative approach based on the bulb surface angle (BSA) and vertical interval (VI) derived from three-dimensional surface data. The analysis is based on 613 experimentally produced blades manufactured by skilled knappers using four flaking techniques: hard-hammer direct percussion, soft-hammer direct percussion, indirect percussion, and pressure flaking. BSA and VI were measured within a standardized three-dimensional coordinate system and used to examine the distributional structure of each technique. The results show that blade production techniques form distinct distributional patterns in BSA–VI space. Logistic regression analyses incorporating both BSA and VI demonstrated particularly strong discriminative performance for pressure flaking and indirect percussion, achieving balanced accuracies of 97.5% and 96.1%, respectively, whereas direct percussion exhibited substantial overlap and remained difficult to differentiate. In particular, discrimination between hard- and soft-hammer direct percussion was limited. These findings suggest that BSA captures technological variation associated with modes of force transmission and fracture propagation, rather than serving merely as a geometric descriptor of flake morphology. The combination of BSA and VI provides a reproducible framework for quantitatively evaluating variability in blade production techniques and offers a new approach for investigating technological variation in archaeological blade production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"18 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-026-02561-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying flaking techniques used in blade production is a fundamental challenge in lithic analysis because morphological attributes often overlap among different production methods, limiting the reliability of traditional classifications. This study evaluates a quantitative approach based on the bulb surface angle (BSA) and vertical interval (VI) derived from three-dimensional surface data. The analysis is based on 613 experimentally produced blades manufactured by skilled knappers using four flaking techniques: hard-hammer direct percussion, soft-hammer direct percussion, indirect percussion, and pressure flaking. BSA and VI were measured within a standardized three-dimensional coordinate system and used to examine the distributional structure of each technique. The results show that blade production techniques form distinct distributional patterns in BSA–VI space. Logistic regression analyses incorporating both BSA and VI demonstrated particularly strong discriminative performance for pressure flaking and indirect percussion, achieving balanced accuracies of 97.5% and 96.1%, respectively, whereas direct percussion exhibited substantial overlap and remained difficult to differentiate. In particular, discrimination between hard- and soft-hammer direct percussion was limited. These findings suggest that BSA captures technological variation associated with modes of force transmission and fracture propagation, rather than serving merely as a geometric descriptor of flake morphology. The combination of BSA and VI provides a reproducible framework for quantitatively evaluating variability in blade production techniques and offers a new approach for investigating technological variation in archaeological blade production.

利用球茎表面角(BSA)从三维表面数据导出的定量鉴定剥落技术
确定刀片生产中使用的剥落技术是岩屑分析的一个基本挑战,因为不同生产方法的形态属性经常重叠,限制了传统分类的可靠性。本研究评估了一种基于球茎表面角度(BSA)和垂直间距(VI)的定量方法,该方法来源于三维表面数据。该分析基于613个实验生产的叶片,由熟练的钳工使用四种剥落技术:硬锤直接敲击、软锤直接敲击、间接敲击和压力剥落。在标准化的三维坐标系中测量BSA和VI,并用于检查每种技术的分布结构。结果表明,叶片生产技术在BSA-VI空间中具有明显的分布格局。结合BSA和VI的Logistic回归分析显示,压力剥离和间接冲击的判别性能特别强,分别达到97.5%和96.1%的平衡精度,而直接冲击表现出大量重叠,仍然难以区分。特别是,硬锤和软锤直接敲击之间的区别是有限的。这些发现表明,BSA捕获了与力传递和断裂扩展模式相关的技术变化,而不仅仅是薄片形貌的几何描述符。BSA和VI的结合为定量评估叶片生产技术的可变性提供了一个可重复的框架,并为研究考古叶片生产的技术变化提供了一种新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书