Utilization of waste mud from directional drilling: a review

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yi Pan, Zhongrui Ji, Xukun Fan, Shuangchun Yang, Mingzhe Guo, Yulin Yan
{"title":"Utilization of waste mud from directional drilling: a review","authors":"Yi Pan,&nbsp;Zhongrui Ji,&nbsp;Xukun Fan,&nbsp;Shuangchun Yang,&nbsp;Mingzhe Guo,&nbsp;Yulin Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10064-026-05341-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Directional drilling technology is widely used worldwide to construct underground pipelines and utility corridors. However, the process generates large volumes of drilling fluid and excavated solids that present substantial waste-management challenges. Disposal is often constrained less by the absence of treatment technologies than by their site-specific cost, practicality, and regulatory acceptance. Solid-liquid separation can substantially reduce the volume requiring disposal; the separated water may be treated, while the solids may be reused, solidified, or landfilled. In many projects, local treatment capacity is limited, so construction units contract specialist companies to handle the waste mud, which increases project cost. Inadequate management can therefore create construction, financial, and environmental risks. This review synthesizes international literature and reported practice. It examines waste-mud generation and composition; compares regulatory and management approaches across North America, Europe, Oceania, and other jurisdictions; evaluates source reduction, gravity separation, physical-chemical conditioning, solidification, landfill, and land application; and reviews resource-utilization pathways after solid-liquid separation. A prioritized selection framework is proposed to help engineers compare treatment options by mud properties, site constraints, environmental risk, and relative cost.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"85 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-026-05341-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Directional drilling technology is widely used worldwide to construct underground pipelines and utility corridors. However, the process generates large volumes of drilling fluid and excavated solids that present substantial waste-management challenges. Disposal is often constrained less by the absence of treatment technologies than by their site-specific cost, practicality, and regulatory acceptance. Solid-liquid separation can substantially reduce the volume requiring disposal; the separated water may be treated, while the solids may be reused, solidified, or landfilled. In many projects, local treatment capacity is limited, so construction units contract specialist companies to handle the waste mud, which increases project cost. Inadequate management can therefore create construction, financial, and environmental risks. This review synthesizes international literature and reported practice. It examines waste-mud generation and composition; compares regulatory and management approaches across North America, Europe, Oceania, and other jurisdictions; evaluates source reduction, gravity separation, physical-chemical conditioning, solidification, landfill, and land application; and reviews resource-utilization pathways after solid-liquid separation. A prioritized selection framework is proposed to help engineers compare treatment options by mud properties, site constraints, environmental risk, and relative cost.

定向钻井废泥浆的利用综述
定向钻井技术在世界范围内广泛应用于地下管线和公用走廊的施工。然而,该过程会产生大量的钻井液和挖掘出的固体,这给废物管理带来了巨大的挑战。处置往往受到特定场地成本、实用性和监管接受程度的限制,而不是由于缺乏处理技术。固液分离可大大减少需要处理的体积;分离出来的水可以被处理,而固体可以被再利用、固化或填埋。在许多项目中,当地处理能力有限,因此建设单位聘请专业公司处理废泥,增加了项目成本。因此,管理不当会造成施工、财务和环境风险。这篇综述综合了国际文献和报道的实践。它审查了废泥的产生和组成;比较北美、欧洲、大洋洲和其他司法管辖区的监管和管理方法;评估来源减少、重力分离、物理化学调理、固化、填埋和土地应用;综述了固液分离后的资源利用途径。提出了一个优先选择框架,以帮助工程师根据泥浆性质、场地限制、环境风险和相对成本来比较处理方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书