Enhancing seismic demand assessment through explainable artificial intelligence and Predictive Power Score-based ground motion parameter selection

IF 1.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Hayri Baytan Ozmen, Mustafa Hayri Kesikoglu
{"title":"Enhancing seismic demand assessment through explainable artificial intelligence and Predictive Power Score-based ground motion parameter selection","authors":"Hayri Baytan Ozmen,&nbsp;Mustafa Hayri Kesikoglu","doi":"10.1007/s10950-026-10463-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Effective seismic risk management requires reliable, interpretable, and data-driven models to navigate the highly stochastic and uncertain characteristics of earthquake ground motions. Conventional ground motion intensity measures (GMIMs) often provide limited decision support in seismic demand modeling because they inadequately represent the complex, nonlinear, and interaction-driven relationships between seismic inputs and structural vulnerabilities. To address these uncertainties, this study presents an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework that employs the Predictive Power Score (PPS) as a robust, data-driven metric to support hybrid ground motion parameter selection for seismic demand assessment. The framework is evaluated using a large-scale dataset comprising 492,096 nonlinear time history simulations generated from 466 ground motion records and 1,056 structural models. Twenty scalar GMIMs and 190 hybrid parameter combinations are assessed based on their ability to predict displacement demand, a key indicator of seismic risk. Results indicate that the Velocity Spectrum Intensity and Effective Design Acceleration hybrid achieves the highest predictive performance with a PPS value of 0.674, representing a 14.4% improvement over the best scalar measure (VSI, PPS = 0.589, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and a 20.7% reduction in mean absolute error. Statistical robustness is confirmed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and 10,000 bootstrap resampling iterations. Model transparency is ensured using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), which unravel the \"black-box\" nature of the predictions and reveal physically consistent, synergistic relationships between ground motion characteristics. Overall, the framework strengthens risk-informed decision-making and stochastic demand assessment for low- to mid-rise reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in shallow-crustal seismic zones, significantly reducing predictive uncertainties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-026-10463-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective seismic risk management requires reliable, interpretable, and data-driven models to navigate the highly stochastic and uncertain characteristics of earthquake ground motions. Conventional ground motion intensity measures (GMIMs) often provide limited decision support in seismic demand modeling because they inadequately represent the complex, nonlinear, and interaction-driven relationships between seismic inputs and structural vulnerabilities. To address these uncertainties, this study presents an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework that employs the Predictive Power Score (PPS) as a robust, data-driven metric to support hybrid ground motion parameter selection for seismic demand assessment. The framework is evaluated using a large-scale dataset comprising 492,096 nonlinear time history simulations generated from 466 ground motion records and 1,056 structural models. Twenty scalar GMIMs and 190 hybrid parameter combinations are assessed based on their ability to predict displacement demand, a key indicator of seismic risk. Results indicate that the Velocity Spectrum Intensity and Effective Design Acceleration hybrid achieves the highest predictive performance with a PPS value of 0.674, representing a 14.4% improvement over the best scalar measure (VSI, PPS = 0.589, p < 0.001) and a 20.7% reduction in mean absolute error. Statistical robustness is confirmed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and 10,000 bootstrap resampling iterations. Model transparency is ensured using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), which unravel the "black-box" nature of the predictions and reveal physically consistent, synergistic relationships between ground motion characteristics. Overall, the framework strengthens risk-informed decision-making and stochastic demand assessment for low- to mid-rise reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in shallow-crustal seismic zones, significantly reducing predictive uncertainties.

通过可解释的人工智能和基于预测功率评分的地震动参数选择加强地震需求评估
有效的地震风险管理需要可靠的、可解释的和数据驱动的模型来导航地震地面运动的高度随机和不确定特征。传统的地震动强度测量(gims)通常在地震需求建模中提供有限的决策支持,因为它们不能充分代表地震输入和结构脆弱性之间复杂、非线性和相互驱动的关系。为了解决这些不确定性,本研究提出了一个可解释的人工智能(XAI)框架,该框架采用预测功率评分(PPS)作为一个强大的数据驱动指标,以支持地震需求评估的混合地震动参数选择。该框架使用一个大型数据集进行评估,该数据集包括466个地面运动记录和1056个结构模型生成的492,096个非线性时程模拟。根据预测位移需求(地震风险的关键指标)的能力,对20个标量gims和190个混合参数组合进行了评估。结果表明,速度谱强度和有效设计加速度的混合预测性能最高,PPS值为0.674,比最佳标量测量(VSI, PPS = 0.589, p < 0.001)提高了14.4%,平均绝对误差降低了20.7%。统计稳健性是通过使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和10,000次自举重采样迭代来确认的。使用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)确保了模型的透明度,该解释揭示了预测的“黑箱”性质,并揭示了地面运动特征之间物理上一致的协同关系。总体而言,该框架加强了浅地壳地震带中低层钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑的风险知情决策和随机需求评估,显著降低了预测的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Seismology
Journal of Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence. Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书