Multi-Objective experimental optimization of sustainable concrete incorporating incinerator bottom ash and copper mining tailings

Sandeep Singh, Indrajeet Sahu, Bhargav P. Majmundar, Roshita David, Jagdeep Singh, Vanitha S., Gaurav Thakur
{"title":"Multi-Objective experimental optimization of sustainable concrete incorporating incinerator bottom ash and copper mining tailings","authors":"Sandeep Singh,&nbsp;Indrajeet Sahu,&nbsp;Bhargav P. Majmundar,&nbsp;Roshita David,&nbsp;Jagdeep Singh,&nbsp;Vanitha S.,&nbsp;Gaurav Thakur","doi":"10.1007/s44150-026-00225-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construction sector is increasingly evaluating industrial residues as substitutes for conventional cement and aggregate. This study investigates incinerator bottom ash (IBA) as a partial cement replacement and copper mining tailings (CMT) as a fine-aggregate replacement. A two-factor, four-level L16 experimental matrix comprising 16 mixtures was used to evaluate fresh, mechanical, durability-related, and microstructural responses. IBA was the dominant factor in the measured strength response: 28-day compressive strength decreased from 49.53 MPa in the control mixture to approximately 30 MPa at 20% IBA, whereas CMT had a smaller effect and IBA0-CMT20 reached 50.77 MPa. The one-factor ANOVA attributed most of the variation in compressive strength (eta squared = 0.99), density (eta squared = 1.00), slump (eta squared = 0.95), and porosity (eta squared = 0.92) to IBA level. SEM, XRD, and FTIR observations linked the high-IBA response to binder dilution, reduced continuity of hydration products, and greater porosity. Within the tested materials and curing regime, replacing 20% of natural sand with CMT preserved the target compressive strength when IBA was not used. Independent batches, material-specific characterization, leaching assessment, and long-term durability testing are needed before field application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-026-00225-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction sector is increasingly evaluating industrial residues as substitutes for conventional cement and aggregate. This study investigates incinerator bottom ash (IBA) as a partial cement replacement and copper mining tailings (CMT) as a fine-aggregate replacement. A two-factor, four-level L16 experimental matrix comprising 16 mixtures was used to evaluate fresh, mechanical, durability-related, and microstructural responses. IBA was the dominant factor in the measured strength response: 28-day compressive strength decreased from 49.53 MPa in the control mixture to approximately 30 MPa at 20% IBA, whereas CMT had a smaller effect and IBA0-CMT20 reached 50.77 MPa. The one-factor ANOVA attributed most of the variation in compressive strength (eta squared = 0.99), density (eta squared = 1.00), slump (eta squared = 0.95), and porosity (eta squared = 0.92) to IBA level. SEM, XRD, and FTIR observations linked the high-IBA response to binder dilution, reduced continuity of hydration products, and greater porosity. Within the tested materials and curing regime, replacing 20% of natural sand with CMT preserved the target compressive strength when IBA was not used. Independent batches, material-specific characterization, leaching assessment, and long-term durability testing are needed before field application.

含焚烧炉底灰和铜尾矿的可持续混凝土多目标试验优化
建筑部门越来越多地评价工业残留物作为传统水泥和骨料的替代品。本研究以焚烧炉底灰(IBA)代替部分水泥,以铜尾矿(CMT)代替细骨料。一个由16种混合物组成的双因素、四水平L16实验矩阵用于评估新鲜、机械、耐久性相关和微观结构响应。IBA是测量强度响应的主导因素:在20% IBA时,对照混合物的28天抗压强度从49.53 MPa下降到约30 MPa,而CMT的影响较小,IBA0-CMT20达到50.77 MPa。单因素方差分析将抗压强度(eta平方= 0.99)、密度(eta平方= 1.00)、坍落度(eta平方= 0.95)和孔隙度(eta平方= 0.92)的大部分变化归因于IBA水平。SEM、XRD和FTIR观察表明,高iba反应与粘合剂稀释、水化产物连续性降低和孔隙度增加有关。在测试材料和养护方案中,当不使用IBA时,用CMT代替20%的天然砂保持了目标抗压强度。在现场应用之前,需要进行独立批次、材料特定特性、浸出评估和长期耐久性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书