El Miloud Ar-Reyouchi;Saadia Chabel;Hamza Hamout;Abdeljalil Alaoui Douiri;Omar Sefraoui;Kamal Ghoumid
{"title":"Reliability-Margin KBGWO for Robust RFID Network Planning","authors":"El Miloud Ar-Reyouchi;Saadia Chabel;Hamza Hamout;Abdeljalil Alaoui Douiri;Omar Sefraoui;Kamal Ghoumid","doi":"10.1109/JRFID.2026.3736723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This brief paper presents a compact reliability-margin framework for robust radio-frequency identification (RFID) planning in healthcare environments. Deterministic RFID network planning can overestimate indoor healthcare coverage when walls and propagation variability perturb the effective link margin. A reliability-margin Knowledge-Based Grey Wolf Optimizer (KBGWO) is proposed for criticality-aware RFID network planning. Grid readability is estimated from sample-wise Monte Carlo read indicators under stochastic path loss, wall loss, and shadowing. The objective maximizes criticality-weighted reliable coverage and lower-tail reliability while penalizing redundant-read risk, cost, and shortfall from a reliable-coverage target. A small hospital-pilot readability validation compares measured ultra-high-frequency RFID (UHF-RFID) read probabilities with simulated probabilities over line-of-sight (LOS), one-wall, two-wall, metallic-obstructed, and service-core non-line-of-sight (NLOS) locations. The pilot gives mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.029, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.031, and correlation <inline-formula> <tex-math>$r=0.988$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Simulations on a hospital-inspired grid show that KBGWO increases reliable coverage from 77.8% to 85.9% and lower-tail reliability from 71.3% to 91.3% versus deterministic KBGWO, at 29% higher cost. Additional checks include external reimplemented baselines, weight sensitivity, Monte Carlo sample stability, ablation, attenuation sensitivity, convergence behavior, perturbed layouts, and raw seed reporting.","PeriodicalId":73291,"journal":{"name":"IEEE journal of radio frequency identification","volume":"10 ","pages":"817-821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE journal of radio frequency identification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11703624/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This brief paper presents a compact reliability-margin framework for robust radio-frequency identification (RFID) planning in healthcare environments. Deterministic RFID network planning can overestimate indoor healthcare coverage when walls and propagation variability perturb the effective link margin. A reliability-margin Knowledge-Based Grey Wolf Optimizer (KBGWO) is proposed for criticality-aware RFID network planning. Grid readability is estimated from sample-wise Monte Carlo read indicators under stochastic path loss, wall loss, and shadowing. The objective maximizes criticality-weighted reliable coverage and lower-tail reliability while penalizing redundant-read risk, cost, and shortfall from a reliable-coverage target. A small hospital-pilot readability validation compares measured ultra-high-frequency RFID (UHF-RFID) read probabilities with simulated probabilities over line-of-sight (LOS), one-wall, two-wall, metallic-obstructed, and service-core non-line-of-sight (NLOS) locations. The pilot gives mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.029, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.031, and correlation $r=0.988$ . Simulations on a hospital-inspired grid show that KBGWO increases reliable coverage from 77.8% to 85.9% and lower-tail reliability from 71.3% to 91.3% versus deterministic KBGWO, at 29% higher cost. Additional checks include external reimplemented baselines, weight sensitivity, Monte Carlo sample stability, ablation, attenuation sensitivity, convergence behavior, perturbed layouts, and raw seed reporting.