ParAge: A pilot study using participatory methods to assess outdoor environmental fall risks in older adults

IF 4.4 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Antoine Langeard, Adéla Kola, Evrim Gökç, Emma Milot, Valentine Erne-Heintz, Zakaria N. Doueiri, Abby C. King
{"title":"ParAge: A pilot study using participatory methods to assess outdoor environmental fall risks in older adults","authors":"Antoine Langeard, Adéla Kola, Evrim Gökç, Emma Milot, Valentine Erne-Heintz, Zakaria N. Doueiri, Abby C. King","doi":"10.1177/00420980261490057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population aging and urbanization have made age-friendly urban design a global priority. While the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities and Communities framework identifies outdoor spaces as a critical domain, fall prevention remains under-addressed. Falls are a leading cause of injury and loss of autonomy, with approximately 73% of outdoor falls triggered by modifiable environmental factors. This study developed and evaluated a participatory, geolocated method based on the <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Our Voice</jats:italic> citizen science framework to identify environmental fall risks and generate consensus-based solutions. Twenty-eight participants engaged in a workshop, using a mobile app to record 314 geotagged environmental features during diagnostic walks. These data were then reviewed in facilitated sessions where participants co-analyzed findings and rated potential solutions. The research specifically examined whether outputs diverged based on participant profiles, such as age, fall history, or fear of falling. Results highlighted seven categories of risk factors, most frequently involving poor surface conditions, lack of maintenance, and obstacles. Notably, participants with a history of falls or a greater fear of falling reported different risks, suggesting varied perceptions of the urban environment. However, no significant differences were observed in proposed solutions, such as infrastructure maintenance and improved signage, indicating a strong consensus on feasible interventions. Qualitative feedback confirmed the method’s acceptability and feasibility, praising its inclusive, field-based nature. This participatory approach complements existing walkability indices by capturing overlooked hazards. By integrating diverse lived experiences into environmental assessments, this method can contribute to safer pedestrian mobility and the development of truly inclusive cities for all ages.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261490057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population aging and urbanization have made age-friendly urban design a global priority. While the WHO’s Age-Friendly Cities and Communities framework identifies outdoor spaces as a critical domain, fall prevention remains under-addressed. Falls are a leading cause of injury and loss of autonomy, with approximately 73% of outdoor falls triggered by modifiable environmental factors. This study developed and evaluated a participatory, geolocated method based on the Our Voice citizen science framework to identify environmental fall risks and generate consensus-based solutions. Twenty-eight participants engaged in a workshop, using a mobile app to record 314 geotagged environmental features during diagnostic walks. These data were then reviewed in facilitated sessions where participants co-analyzed findings and rated potential solutions. The research specifically examined whether outputs diverged based on participant profiles, such as age, fall history, or fear of falling. Results highlighted seven categories of risk factors, most frequently involving poor surface conditions, lack of maintenance, and obstacles. Notably, participants with a history of falls or a greater fear of falling reported different risks, suggesting varied perceptions of the urban environment. However, no significant differences were observed in proposed solutions, such as infrastructure maintenance and improved signage, indicating a strong consensus on feasible interventions. Qualitative feedback confirmed the method’s acceptability and feasibility, praising its inclusive, field-based nature. This participatory approach complements existing walkability indices by capturing overlooked hazards. By integrating diverse lived experiences into environmental assessments, this method can contribute to safer pedestrian mobility and the development of truly inclusive cities for all ages.
一项使用参与式方法评估老年人户外环境跌倒风险的试点研究
人口老龄化和城市化使老年人友好型城市设计成为全球优先考虑的问题。虽然世卫组织的“老年人友好型城市和社区”框架将户外空间确定为一个关键领域,但预防跌倒的问题仍然没有得到充分解决。跌倒是造成伤害和丧失自主性的主要原因,大约73%的户外跌倒是由可改变的环境因素引发的。本研究开发并评估了一种基于“我们的声音”公民科学框架的参与式地理定位方法,以识别环境下降风险并产生基于共识的解决方案。28名参与者参加了一个研讨会,在诊断步行期间使用移动应用程序记录314个地理标记的环境特征。然后,这些数据在方便的会议上进行审查,参与者共同分析结果并对潜在的解决方案进行评级。该研究特别检查了结果是否会根据参与者的资料(如年龄、跌倒史或对跌倒的恐惧)而出现差异。结果强调了7类风险因素,最常见的包括恶劣的地面条件、缺乏维护和障碍物。值得注意的是,有跌倒史或更害怕跌倒的参与者报告的风险不同,这表明他们对城市环境的看法不同。然而,在提出的解决方案(如基础设施维护和改进标识)方面没有观察到显着差异,表明对可行干预措施的强烈共识。定性反馈证实了该方法的可接受性和可行性,赞扬了其包容性和实地性。这种参与性方法通过捕捉被忽视的危险,补充了现有的步行性指数。通过将不同的生活体验整合到环境评估中,这种方法可以促进更安全的行人流动性,并为所有年龄段的人提供真正包容的城市发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书