Co‐Benefits of Intercropping on Crop Productivity, Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration and N 2 O Mitigation

IF 12.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jinyu He, Zhisheng Yao, Tianli Zhang, Haojie Guo, Yang Zhan, Rui Wang, Yong Li, Xunhua Zheng, Klaus Butterbach‐Bahl
{"title":"Co‐Benefits of Intercropping on Crop Productivity, Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration and N 2 O Mitigation","authors":"Jinyu He, Zhisheng Yao, Tianli Zhang, Haojie Guo, Yang Zhan, Rui Wang, Yong Li, Xunhua Zheng, Klaus Butterbach‐Bahl","doi":"10.1111/gcb.71149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intercropping is a promising sustainable agriculture practice, but its adoption is hindered by the potential reduction in benefits when shifting from monoculture to intercropping, especially if there are trade‐offs between yield, soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrous oxide (N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O) emissions. In this study, we synthesized 3843 paired observations from 510 field‐based studies that compared the yields, SOC and N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O emissions of intercropping systems (only crop‐crop intercropping for grain yield and including crop‐tree agroforestry in addition to crop‐crop intercropping for SOC and N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O) with monoculture systems. Our meta‐analysis revealed that on average, intercropping increased grain yields by 22.3%, calorie production by 16.1% and protein yields by 14.4%, while reducing N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O emissions by 14.3%. Legume‐based intercropping was found to be more effective than non‐legume intercropping. Intercropping also significantly increased SOC content, with crop‐tree agroforestry outperforming crop‐crop intercropping (average increases of 15.5% and 6.1%, respectively). However, the effectiveness of intercropping systems varies depending on climate, soil properties and management practices. Based on data‐driven machine learning models, our upscaling analyses show that converting monoculture land to cereal‐legume intercropping could increase grain yields by 5.35 × 10 <jats:sup>8</jats:sup> Mg yr. <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> , potentially feeding nearly 1013 million people. This conversion could also enhance SOC stocks by 2.84 Pg C yr. <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and reduce N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O emissions by 625 Gg N yr. <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> , resulting in a reduction of 10.6 Pg CO <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> ‐eq yr. <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for net global warming potential. Overall, converting monoculture systems to intercropping could generate approximately US$595 billion in economic benefits annually. These findings highlight the critical role of intercropping as a scalable nature‐based solution for addressing the dual challenges of global food security and climate change.","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.71149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intercropping is a promising sustainable agriculture practice, but its adoption is hindered by the potential reduction in benefits when shifting from monoculture to intercropping, especially if there are trade‐offs between yield, soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions. In this study, we synthesized 3843 paired observations from 510 field‐based studies that compared the yields, SOC and N 2 O emissions of intercropping systems (only crop‐crop intercropping for grain yield and including crop‐tree agroforestry in addition to crop‐crop intercropping for SOC and N 2 O) with monoculture systems. Our meta‐analysis revealed that on average, intercropping increased grain yields by 22.3%, calorie production by 16.1% and protein yields by 14.4%, while reducing N 2 O emissions by 14.3%. Legume‐based intercropping was found to be more effective than non‐legume intercropping. Intercropping also significantly increased SOC content, with crop‐tree agroforestry outperforming crop‐crop intercropping (average increases of 15.5% and 6.1%, respectively). However, the effectiveness of intercropping systems varies depending on climate, soil properties and management practices. Based on data‐driven machine learning models, our upscaling analyses show that converting monoculture land to cereal‐legume intercropping could increase grain yields by 5.35 × 10 8 Mg yr. −1 , potentially feeding nearly 1013 million people. This conversion could also enhance SOC stocks by 2.84 Pg C yr. −1 and reduce N 2 O emissions by 625 Gg N yr. −1 , resulting in a reduction of 10.6 Pg CO 2 ‐eq yr. −1 for net global warming potential. Overall, converting monoculture systems to intercropping could generate approximately US$595 billion in economic benefits annually. These findings highlight the critical role of intercropping as a scalable nature‐based solution for addressing the dual challenges of global food security and climate change.
间作对作物生产力、土壤有机碳固存和氮氧减缓的共同效益
间作是一种很有前途的可持续农业做法,但由于从单一种植转向间作可能会降低效益,特别是在产量、土壤有机碳(SOC)和氧化亚氮(n2o)排放之间存在权衡的情况下,间作的采用受到阻碍。在这项研究中,我们综合了来自510个实地研究的3843个成对观测结果,比较了间作系统(仅作物-作物间作用于粮食产量,除了作物-作物间作之外还包括作物-树木复合林业用于有机碳和氮氧化物)与单一栽培系统的产量、有机碳和氮氧化物排放。我们的荟萃分析显示,平均而言,间作增加了22.3%的粮食产量,16.1%的卡路里产量和14.4%的蛋白质产量,同时减少了14.3%的氮排放。豆科作物间作比非豆科作物间作更有效。间作也显著提高了有机碳含量,其中,作物-树木复合林业的表现优于作物-作物间作(平均增幅分别为15.5%和6.1%)。然而,间作制度的有效性因气候、土壤性质和管理实践而异。基于数据驱动的机器学习模型,我们的升级分析表明,将单一农田转换为谷物-豆类间作可使粮食产量增加5.35 × 108毫克/年- 1,可能养活近10.13亿人。这种转化还可以使SOC储量增加2.84 Pg C /年,减少625 Gg N /年,从而使净全球变暖潜势减少10.6 Pg CO 2 - eq /年。总体而言,将单一栽培系统转换为间作每年可产生约5,950亿美元的经济效益。这些发现突出了间作作为一种可扩展的基于自然的解决方案在应对全球粮食安全和气候变化双重挑战方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书