From Public to Private Governance, and Back—Eco‐Modulation as De‐Privatization in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

IF 5.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Harri Kalimo, Antti Jukka, Reid Lifset, Petrus Kautto
{"title":"From Public to Private Governance, and Back—Eco‐Modulation as De‐Privatization in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)","authors":"Harri Kalimo, Antti Jukka, Reid Lifset, Petrus Kautto","doi":"10.1111/rego.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union is advancing circular economy policies, aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of products across their life‐cycles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) exemplifies this strategy. It privatizes the end‐of‐life management of products to their producers, seeking thereby to incentivize the producer to design environmentally more sustainable products. However, EPR has failed to deliver significant improvements in product design. This article examines the EU's attempts to strengthen eco‐design in EPR through ‘eco‐modulation’. Applying the theory of competence‐and‐control, the article argues that the introduction of eco‐modulation will destabilize the public‐private balance in EPR, shifting EPR back from private towards public governance. This de‐privatization is expected to refine EPR's role within the EU's policy mix. Our findings thus offer insights for the development of EPR‐related circular economy policies, while also contributing to theories of privatization.","PeriodicalId":21026,"journal":{"name":"Regulation & Governance","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union is advancing circular economy policies, aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of products across their life‐cycles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) exemplifies this strategy. It privatizes the end‐of‐life management of products to their producers, seeking thereby to incentivize the producer to design environmentally more sustainable products. However, EPR has failed to deliver significant improvements in product design. This article examines the EU's attempts to strengthen eco‐design in EPR through ‘eco‐modulation’. Applying the theory of competence‐and‐control, the article argues that the introduction of eco‐modulation will destabilize the public‐private balance in EPR, shifting EPR back from private towards public governance. This de‐privatization is expected to refine EPR's role within the EU's policy mix. Our findings thus offer insights for the development of EPR‐related circular economy policies, while also contributing to theories of privatization.
从公共治理到私人治理:扩展生产者责任(EPR)中的反生态调节与去私有化
欧盟正在推进循环经济政策,旨在减少产品在整个生命周期中对环境的影响。扩大生产者责任(EPR)是这一策略的典范。它将产品的寿命结束管理私有化给生产者,从而寻求激励生产者设计更环保的可持续产品。然而,EPR未能在产品设计方面带来重大改进。本文考察了欧盟通过“生态调节”加强EPR生态设计的尝试。运用能力-控制理论,本文认为生态调节的引入将破坏环境环境评估中公私平衡的稳定性,使环境环境评估从私人治理转向公共治理。这种去私有化有望完善EPR在欧盟政策组合中的作用。因此,我们的研究结果为EPR相关循环经济政策的制定提供了见解,同时也为私有化理论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Regulation & Governance serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. Through the peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance, we seek to advance discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promote the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serve the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书