Harri Kalimo, Antti Jukka, Reid Lifset, Petrus Kautto
{"title":"From Public to Private Governance, and Back—Eco‐Modulation as De‐Privatization in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)","authors":"Harri Kalimo, Antti Jukka, Reid Lifset, Petrus Kautto","doi":"10.1111/rego.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union is advancing circular economy policies, aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of products across their life‐cycles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) exemplifies this strategy. It privatizes the end‐of‐life management of products to their producers, seeking thereby to incentivize the producer to design environmentally more sustainable products. However, EPR has failed to deliver significant improvements in product design. This article examines the EU's attempts to strengthen eco‐design in EPR through ‘eco‐modulation’. Applying the theory of competence‐and‐control, the article argues that the introduction of eco‐modulation will destabilize the public‐private balance in EPR, shifting EPR back from private towards public governance. This de‐privatization is expected to refine EPR's role within the EU's policy mix. Our findings thus offer insights for the development of EPR‐related circular economy policies, while also contributing to theories of privatization.","PeriodicalId":21026,"journal":{"name":"Regulation & Governance","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The European Union is advancing circular economy policies, aimed at reducing the environmental impacts of products across their life‐cycles. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) exemplifies this strategy. It privatizes the end‐of‐life management of products to their producers, seeking thereby to incentivize the producer to design environmentally more sustainable products. However, EPR has failed to deliver significant improvements in product design. This article examines the EU's attempts to strengthen eco‐design in EPR through ‘eco‐modulation’. Applying the theory of competence‐and‐control, the article argues that the introduction of eco‐modulation will destabilize the public‐private balance in EPR, shifting EPR back from private towards public governance. This de‐privatization is expected to refine EPR's role within the EU's policy mix. Our findings thus offer insights for the development of EPR‐related circular economy policies, while also contributing to theories of privatization.
期刊介绍:
Regulation & Governance serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. Through the peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance, we seek to advance discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promote the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serve the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.