Unbelonging: Bataille's heterology and the radical notions of otherness

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
Tung-Wei Ko
{"title":"Unbelonging: Bataille's heterology and the radical notions of otherness","authors":"Tung-Wei Ko","doi":"10.1177/09571558261496177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay probes the condition of ‘unbelonging’ through the lens of Georges Bataille's heterology – a radical theory of otherness, of that which resists assimilation into ordered systems of knowledge, utility and meaning. Heterology, for Bataille, signifies not so much a conceptual opposition, but a structural transgression, an exposure to the unincorporable embodied by waste, abjection, the sovereign and the evil. The essay argues that the central aporia of Bataille's thesis emblematises the essence of unbelonging, which designates alienation as a volatile mode of being constituted through exclusion without ever attaining absolute exteriority. The argument unfolds through an interrogation of two pivotal figures in Bataille's thought: the Marquis de Sade and Gilles de Rais, both of whose transgressive acts embody the very core of heterology. Moving from their historical and literary legacies to wider philosophical implications, this essay traces how these figures operate as ruptures within the established order, as heterogeneous agents that disrupt coherence rather than reinforce it. Engaging closely with Bataille, alongside related thinkers such as Durkheim, Barthes, Lévinas and Baudrillard, this essay posits unbelonging as an ontological dissonance: a mode of being for whom the representational is perpetually inadequate. Unbelonging is not alienation in a classical sense, but a state of constitutive otherness, incompatible with the dialectics of recognition or integration. The essay concludes by returning to the inherent contradiction of heterology: its necessity to articulate that which resists all articulation, rendering the heterogeneous subject both indispensable and impossible. Extending the main thesis to a contemporary reality characterised by the destabilisation of norms, the essay questions the continued feasibility of a radical alterity, and whether unbelonging might now being taken to denote a silent retreat from the very logic of visibility.","PeriodicalId":12398,"journal":{"name":"French Cultural Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09571558261496177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay probes the condition of ‘unbelonging’ through the lens of Georges Bataille's heterology – a radical theory of otherness, of that which resists assimilation into ordered systems of knowledge, utility and meaning. Heterology, for Bataille, signifies not so much a conceptual opposition, but a structural transgression, an exposure to the unincorporable embodied by waste, abjection, the sovereign and the evil. The essay argues that the central aporia of Bataille's thesis emblematises the essence of unbelonging, which designates alienation as a volatile mode of being constituted through exclusion without ever attaining absolute exteriority. The argument unfolds through an interrogation of two pivotal figures in Bataille's thought: the Marquis de Sade and Gilles de Rais, both of whose transgressive acts embody the very core of heterology. Moving from their historical and literary legacies to wider philosophical implications, this essay traces how these figures operate as ruptures within the established order, as heterogeneous agents that disrupt coherence rather than reinforce it. Engaging closely with Bataille, alongside related thinkers such as Durkheim, Barthes, Lévinas and Baudrillard, this essay posits unbelonging as an ontological dissonance: a mode of being for whom the representational is perpetually inadequate. Unbelonging is not alienation in a classical sense, but a state of constitutive otherness, incompatible with the dialectics of recognition or integration. The essay concludes by returning to the inherent contradiction of heterology: its necessity to articulate that which resists all articulation, rendering the heterogeneous subject both indispensable and impossible. Extending the main thesis to a contemporary reality characterised by the destabilisation of norms, the essay questions the continued feasibility of a radical alterity, and whether unbelonging might now being taken to denote a silent retreat from the very logic of visibility.
不属于:巴塔耶的异质论和他者性的激进概念
本文通过乔治·巴塔耶的异质论来探讨“不归属”的条件。异质论是一种关于他者的激进理论,它抵制被知识、效用和意义的有序系统所同化。对巴塔耶来说,异质论与其说是一种概念上的对立,不如说是一种结构上的越界,是对由浪费、卑贱、君主和邪恶所体现的不可融合的暴露。本文认为,巴塔耶论文的中心焦虑象征着不归属的本质,它将异化视为一种通过排斥而构成的不稳定模式,而从未获得绝对的外在性。这场争论通过对巴塔耶思想中两个关键人物的审讯展开:萨德侯爵和吉勒·德·莱,他们的违法行为都体现了异性恋学的核心。从他们的历史和文学遗产到更广泛的哲学含义,本文追溯了这些人物是如何在既定秩序中作为裂缝运作的,作为破坏而不是加强连贯性的异质媒介。这篇文章与巴塔耶以及迪尔凯姆、巴特、伊姆斯和鲍德里亚等相关思想家密切合作,将不属于视为一种本体论的不和谐:一种存在模式,对他们来说,表征永远是不充分的。不属于不是古典意义上的异化,而是一种建构性的他者状态,与承认或整合的辩证法不相容。最后,本文回到了异质论的内在矛盾:它必须阐明那些抵制所有表述的东西,使异质主体既不可缺少又不可能。将主要论点扩展到以规范不稳定为特征的当代现实,文章质疑激进另类的持续可行性,以及现在是否可能被认为是对可见性逻辑的沉默撤退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: French Cultural Studies is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes international research on all aspects of French culture in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Articles are welcome on such areas as cinema, television and radio, the press, the visual arts, popular culture, cultural policy and cultural and intellectual debate. French Cultural Studies is designed to respond to the important changes that have affected the study of French culture, language and society in all sections of the education system. The journal encourages and provides a forum for the full range of work being done on all aspects of modern French culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书