Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative gastrointestinal recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a composite stimulation-pattern framework.

IF 2
Bo Zhang, Xiaodie Deng, Xiu Yang, Jiande D Z Chen
{"title":"Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative gastrointestinal recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis using a composite stimulation-pattern framework.","authors":"Bo Zhang, Xiaodie Deng, Xiu Yang, Jiande D Z Chen","doi":"10.1177/10815589261497363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) promotes postoperative gastrointestinal recovery. However, existing protocols lack standardization due to unaddressed methodological collinearity between frequency and waveform in previous analyses. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TEAS following abdominal surgery and examine whether treatment effects varied across stimulation parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four major databases from inception to April 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TEAS with sham/standard care. Frequency and waveform were systematically reconstructed into a composite \"Stimulation Pattern\" (Intermittent/Fixed vs Dilatational/Alternating). Data were pooled using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty RCTs comprising 2615 patients were included. TEAS significantly accelerated the time to first flatus (mean difference (MD) = -9.08 h, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and first defecation (MD = -16.48 h, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and reduced the incidence of strictly defined postoperative ileus (3 trials; risk ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.96; <i>p</i> = 0.0214). TEAS also shortened hospital stay and mitigated postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain. The intermittent/fixed stimulation pattern was associated with a greater reduction in time to first flatus than the dilatational/alternating pattern (interaction <i>p</i> = 0.0008). Adverse events were minimal (0%-1.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEAS safely accelerates gastrointestinal motility recovery. While an optimal protocol remains to be established, the intermittent/fixed stimulation pattern appears to be a promising candidate configuration. Longer or more frequent treatment did not show clear additional benefit, supporting evaluation of a 30-min once-daily regimen as a pragmatic, resource-efficient strategy in future prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":520677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","volume":" ","pages":"10815589261497363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589261497363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) promotes postoperative gastrointestinal recovery. However, existing protocols lack standardization due to unaddressed methodological collinearity between frequency and waveform in previous analyses. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TEAS following abdominal surgery and examine whether treatment effects varied across stimulation parameters.

Methods: We searched four major databases from inception to April 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TEAS with sham/standard care. Frequency and waveform were systematically reconstructed into a composite "Stimulation Pattern" (Intermittent/Fixed vs Dilatational/Alternating). Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results: Twenty RCTs comprising 2615 patients were included. TEAS significantly accelerated the time to first flatus (mean difference (MD) = -9.08 h, p < 0.0001) and first defecation (MD = -16.48 h, p < 0.0001), and reduced the incidence of strictly defined postoperative ileus (3 trials; risk ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.96; p = 0.0214). TEAS also shortened hospital stay and mitigated postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain. The intermittent/fixed stimulation pattern was associated with a greater reduction in time to first flatus than the dilatational/alternating pattern (interaction p = 0.0008). Adverse events were minimal (0%-1.8%).

Conclusions: TEAS safely accelerates gastrointestinal motility recovery. While an optimal protocol remains to be established, the intermittent/fixed stimulation pattern appears to be a promising candidate configuration. Longer or more frequent treatment did not show clear additional benefit, supporting evaluation of a 30-min once-daily regimen as a pragmatic, resource-efficient strategy in future prospective trials.

经皮穴位电刺激治疗术后胃肠道恢复:使用复合刺激模式框架的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书