{"title":"[Prostate artery embolization-2026 update : Technique, evidence, and role in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].","authors":"P Schott, M Katoh","doi":"10.1007/s00117-026-01672-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical/methodical issue: </strong>Benign prostatic syndrome is the most common urologic condition in older men and substantially affects quality of life.</p><p><strong>Standard radiological methods: </strong>Early stage disease is managed with pharmacotherapy. In advanced disease, transurethral resection is the surgical standard.</p><p><strong>Methodical innovations: </strong>For more than 10 years, prostatic artery embolization has provided a minimally invasive alternative performed under local anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Performance: </strong>Randomized trials and meta-analyses document a marked improvement in symptom score and quality of life with lower periprocedural morbidity than transurethral resection. Five-year data confirm durable symptom improvement, albeit with a higher reintervention rate than the surgical reference standard. Compared with combined medical therapy, embolization proved superior in a randomized trial. Unlike transurethral resection, there is no upper prostate volume limit.</p><p><strong>Achievements: </strong>With its inclusion in national and international guidelines, prostatic artery embolization has left the experimental stage.</p><p><strong>Practical recommendations: </strong>Detailed knowledge of the pelvic vascular anatomy and a clear imaging and navigation strategy are prerequisites. Avoidance of nontarget embolization is the central safety element. Novel embolic agents and potential expansion of indications are undergoing clinical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74635,"journal":{"name":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-026-01672-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical/methodical issue: Benign prostatic syndrome is the most common urologic condition in older men and substantially affects quality of life.
Standard radiological methods: Early stage disease is managed with pharmacotherapy. In advanced disease, transurethral resection is the surgical standard.
Methodical innovations: For more than 10 years, prostatic artery embolization has provided a minimally invasive alternative performed under local anesthesia.
Performance: Randomized trials and meta-analyses document a marked improvement in symptom score and quality of life with lower periprocedural morbidity than transurethral resection. Five-year data confirm durable symptom improvement, albeit with a higher reintervention rate than the surgical reference standard. Compared with combined medical therapy, embolization proved superior in a randomized trial. Unlike transurethral resection, there is no upper prostate volume limit.
Achievements: With its inclusion in national and international guidelines, prostatic artery embolization has left the experimental stage.
Practical recommendations: Detailed knowledge of the pelvic vascular anatomy and a clear imaging and navigation strategy are prerequisites. Avoidance of nontarget embolization is the central safety element. Novel embolic agents and potential expansion of indications are undergoing clinical evaluation.