{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Quality of Care and Care Needs for Asian Children and Young Adults With Serious Long-Term Conditions.","authors":"Shih-Chun Lin, Mei-Chih Huang, Hsiang-Ying Lu, Ying-Chu Chen, Chao-Neng Cheng, Frank Leigh Lu, Jong-Hau Hsu","doi":"10.1111/hex.70892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background or context: </strong>Children and young adults with serious long-term conditions frequently have multidimensional palliative care needs before specialist palliative care referral. However, evidence from Asian populations regarding reported care outcomes and the care needs of children, young adults, and their families remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare patient- or proxy-reported outcomes across levels of professionally assessed palliative care needs and explore felt and unmet care needs from the perspectives of family caregivers and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A convergent mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Participants included 88 caregiver-patient dyads from three medical centres in Taiwan. Patients were aged 1-25 years, had Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS) scores ≥ 15, and had not received specialist palliative care. Twelve family caregivers and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>PaPaS Scale, the African Children's Palliative Care Outcome Scale (C-POS), and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with PaPaS scores ≥ 20 had poorer outcomes for pain, crying, and playing than those scoring 15-19, and their caregivers had greater difficulty sharing their feelings (all p < 0.05; standardised mean differences, 0.35-0.55). Maternal employment status was associated with total C-POS scores (p = 0.005). Four themes described seeking evolving care guidance, integrating care into family routines, sharing enduring caregiving responsibilities, and balancing present living with future preparation. Integration showed that greater normative needs were accompanied by challenges in symptom recognition, everyday participation, and caregiver emotional communication. Although caregivers generally reported receiving adequate support, the qualitative findings indicated that support was most useful when translated into coordinated and practical care plans tailored to family routines and readiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating professional assessments, reported outcomes, and caregiver and healthcare professional experiences identified complementary care needs. The findings support coordinated child- and family-centred care that addresses evolving symptoms, everyday routines, caregiver burden, emotional communication, and families' changing time orientations before referral to specialist palliative care.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>A parent expert reviewed study materials and recruitment strategies and contributed to interpretation of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13643943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background or context: Children and young adults with serious long-term conditions frequently have multidimensional palliative care needs before specialist palliative care referral. However, evidence from Asian populations regarding reported care outcomes and the care needs of children, young adults, and their families remains limited.
Objective: To compare patient- or proxy-reported outcomes across levels of professionally assessed palliative care needs and explore felt and unmet care needs from the perspectives of family caregivers and healthcare professionals.
Design: A convergent mixed-methods design.
Setting and participants: Participants included 88 caregiver-patient dyads from three medical centres in Taiwan. Patients were aged 1-25 years, had Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS) scores ≥ 15, and had not received specialist palliative care. Twelve family caregivers and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed.
Main outcome measures: PaPaS Scale, the African Children's Palliative Care Outcome Scale (C-POS), and semi-structured interviews.
Results: Participants with PaPaS scores ≥ 20 had poorer outcomes for pain, crying, and playing than those scoring 15-19, and their caregivers had greater difficulty sharing their feelings (all p < 0.05; standardised mean differences, 0.35-0.55). Maternal employment status was associated with total C-POS scores (p = 0.005). Four themes described seeking evolving care guidance, integrating care into family routines, sharing enduring caregiving responsibilities, and balancing present living with future preparation. Integration showed that greater normative needs were accompanied by challenges in symptom recognition, everyday participation, and caregiver emotional communication. Although caregivers generally reported receiving adequate support, the qualitative findings indicated that support was most useful when translated into coordinated and practical care plans tailored to family routines and readiness.
Conclusion: Integrating professional assessments, reported outcomes, and caregiver and healthcare professional experiences identified complementary care needs. The findings support coordinated child- and family-centred care that addresses evolving symptoms, everyday routines, caregiver burden, emotional communication, and families' changing time orientations before referral to specialist palliative care.
Patient or public contribution: A parent expert reviewed study materials and recruitment strategies and contributed to interpretation of the findings.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.