A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Quality of Care and Care Needs for Asian Children and Young Adults With Serious Long-Term Conditions.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shih-Chun Lin, Mei-Chih Huang, Hsiang-Ying Lu, Ying-Chu Chen, Chao-Neng Cheng, Frank Leigh Lu, Jong-Hau Hsu
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Quality of Care and Care Needs for Asian Children and Young Adults With Serious Long-Term Conditions.","authors":"Shih-Chun Lin, Mei-Chih Huang, Hsiang-Ying Lu, Ying-Chu Chen, Chao-Neng Cheng, Frank Leigh Lu, Jong-Hau Hsu","doi":"10.1111/hex.70892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background or context: </strong>Children and young adults with serious long-term conditions frequently have multidimensional palliative care needs before specialist palliative care referral. However, evidence from Asian populations regarding reported care outcomes and the care needs of children, young adults, and their families remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare patient- or proxy-reported outcomes across levels of professionally assessed palliative care needs and explore felt and unmet care needs from the perspectives of family caregivers and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A convergent mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Participants included 88 caregiver-patient dyads from three medical centres in Taiwan. Patients were aged 1-25 years, had Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS) scores ≥ 15, and had not received specialist palliative care. Twelve family caregivers and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>PaPaS Scale, the African Children's Palliative Care Outcome Scale (C-POS), and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with PaPaS scores ≥ 20 had poorer outcomes for pain, crying, and playing than those scoring 15-19, and their caregivers had greater difficulty sharing their feelings (all p < 0.05; standardised mean differences, 0.35-0.55). Maternal employment status was associated with total C-POS scores (p = 0.005). Four themes described seeking evolving care guidance, integrating care into family routines, sharing enduring caregiving responsibilities, and balancing present living with future preparation. Integration showed that greater normative needs were accompanied by challenges in symptom recognition, everyday participation, and caregiver emotional communication. Although caregivers generally reported receiving adequate support, the qualitative findings indicated that support was most useful when translated into coordinated and practical care plans tailored to family routines and readiness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating professional assessments, reported outcomes, and caregiver and healthcare professional experiences identified complementary care needs. The findings support coordinated child- and family-centred care that addresses evolving symptoms, everyday routines, caregiver burden, emotional communication, and families' changing time orientations before referral to specialist palliative care.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>A parent expert reviewed study materials and recruitment strategies and contributed to interpretation of the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 5","pages":"e70892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13643943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background or context: Children and young adults with serious long-term conditions frequently have multidimensional palliative care needs before specialist palliative care referral. However, evidence from Asian populations regarding reported care outcomes and the care needs of children, young adults, and their families remains limited.

Objective: To compare patient- or proxy-reported outcomes across levels of professionally assessed palliative care needs and explore felt and unmet care needs from the perspectives of family caregivers and healthcare professionals.

Design: A convergent mixed-methods design.

Setting and participants: Participants included 88 caregiver-patient dyads from three medical centres in Taiwan. Patients were aged 1-25 years, had Paediatric Palliative Screening Scale (PaPaS) scores ≥ 15, and had not received specialist palliative care. Twelve family caregivers and 14 healthcare professionals were interviewed.

Main outcome measures: PaPaS Scale, the African Children's Palliative Care Outcome Scale (C-POS), and semi-structured interviews.

Results: Participants with PaPaS scores ≥ 20 had poorer outcomes for pain, crying, and playing than those scoring 15-19, and their caregivers had greater difficulty sharing their feelings (all p < 0.05; standardised mean differences, 0.35-0.55). Maternal employment status was associated with total C-POS scores (p = 0.005). Four themes described seeking evolving care guidance, integrating care into family routines, sharing enduring caregiving responsibilities, and balancing present living with future preparation. Integration showed that greater normative needs were accompanied by challenges in symptom recognition, everyday participation, and caregiver emotional communication. Although caregivers generally reported receiving adequate support, the qualitative findings indicated that support was most useful when translated into coordinated and practical care plans tailored to family routines and readiness.

Conclusion: Integrating professional assessments, reported outcomes, and caregiver and healthcare professional experiences identified complementary care needs. The findings support coordinated child- and family-centred care that addresses evolving symptoms, everyday routines, caregiver burden, emotional communication, and families' changing time orientations before referral to specialist palliative care.

Patient or public contribution: A parent expert reviewed study materials and recruitment strategies and contributed to interpretation of the findings.

亚洲儿童和青少年严重长期疾病的护理质量和护理需求的混合方法探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书