Impacts of mindfulness- and cognitive behavior-based interventions on psychological and physiological health outcomes in females with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review.
Alicia Duval, Danielle E Berbrier, Arielle Crestol, Brittany K Schwende, Blaine Ditto, Charlotte W Usselman
{"title":"Impacts of mindfulness- and cognitive behavior-based interventions on psychological and physiological health outcomes in females with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review.","authors":"Alicia Duval, Danielle E Berbrier, Arielle Crestol, Brittany K Schwende, Blaine Ditto, Charlotte W Usselman","doi":"10.1177/13591053261489860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review synthesized the effects of mindfulness-based (MBIs) and cognitive behavior-based (CBIs) interventions on psychological and physiological outcomes in females with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Searches across PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, and ProQuest identified randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Twelve studies (<i>n</i> = 5 MBIs; <i>n</i> = 7 CBIs) published between 2015 and 2024 met criteria. Mean sample sizes were 54 (MBIs; <i>n</i> = 269; range = 45-66) and 94 (CBIs; <i>n</i> = 374; range = 33-183). Both intervention types improved psychological outcomes. MBIs showed benefits for depression, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, and body image, whereas CBIs improved depression, anxiety, self-esteem, and PCOS-related quality of life. Physiological findings were inconsistent. CBIs showed potential reductions in weight, systolic blood pressure, free androgen index, and anti-mullerian hormone, while MBIs reduced free testosterone and cortisol. Overall, CBIs and MBIs show promise for improving psychological well-being, whereas physiological benefits remain inconclusive. More robust trials are needed to clarify the long-term benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053261489860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053261489860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This review synthesized the effects of mindfulness-based (MBIs) and cognitive behavior-based (CBIs) interventions on psychological and physiological outcomes in females with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Searches across PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, and ProQuest identified randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Twelve studies (n = 5 MBIs; n = 7 CBIs) published between 2015 and 2024 met criteria. Mean sample sizes were 54 (MBIs; n = 269; range = 45-66) and 94 (CBIs; n = 374; range = 33-183). Both intervention types improved psychological outcomes. MBIs showed benefits for depression, anxiety, stress, self-esteem, and body image, whereas CBIs improved depression, anxiety, self-esteem, and PCOS-related quality of life. Physiological findings were inconsistent. CBIs showed potential reductions in weight, systolic blood pressure, free androgen index, and anti-mullerian hormone, while MBIs reduced free testosterone and cortisol. Overall, CBIs and MBIs show promise for improving psychological well-being, whereas physiological benefits remain inconclusive. More robust trials are needed to clarify the long-term benefits.
期刊介绍:
ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.