Shapley effects to identify the most influential input parameters of organ dose estimation following CT scans in childhood.

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anaïs Foucault, Marouane Il Idrissi, Bertrand Iooss, Choonsik Lee, Marie-Odile Bernier, Sophie Ancelet
{"title":"Shapley effects to identify the most influential input parameters of organ dose estimation following CT scans in childhood.","authors":"Anaïs Foucault, Marouane Il Idrissi, Bertrand Iooss, Choonsik Lee, Marie-Odile Bernier, Sophie Ancelet","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/aeb137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A current methodological challenge in radiation epidemiology is to account for dose uncertainty in risk estimation. An important preliminary step can be to identify the most influential input parameters involved in dose estimation, before modelling and accounting for their related uncertainty in radiation-induced health risk estimates. In this work, a variance-based global sensitivity analysis (GSA) was performed with Shapley effects and, for the first time in radiation dosimetry, to rank by influence the input parameters of a software conventionally used to estimate organ doses arising from computed tomography (CT) scan exposure: NCICT (National Cancer Institute Dosimetry System for CT) (version 1.0). We focused on brain and red bone marrow (RBM) dose estimation in the French CT cohort and our GSA was performed for three types of examination, classified according to the scanned body region: head, chest, and abdominopelvic. Among the eight uncertain input parameters involved in dose estimation, different influential parameters were highlighted depending on both the scan type and the considered organ dose: these are consistent with the underlying dose calculation methodology. For head CT examinations, technical parameters used for image acquisition including x-ray tube current-time product (mAs) and tube potential (kVp), as well as the end of the scanned body area contributed to about 70% of the variance of the brain dose estimate, while mAs, kVp, the start and end of the scanned body area, and age influenced the RBM dose. The brain and RBM doses delivered during chest CT examinations were mainly influenced by mAs, pitch, and kVp. Finally, kVp was the only input parameter with a significant influence on both the RBM and the brain dose for abdominopelvic CT examinations: it explained more than 30% of the variance of these organ doses. From a clinical perspective, our findings may support optimisation of paediatric CT protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aeb137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A current methodological challenge in radiation epidemiology is to account for dose uncertainty in risk estimation. An important preliminary step can be to identify the most influential input parameters involved in dose estimation, before modelling and accounting for their related uncertainty in radiation-induced health risk estimates. In this work, a variance-based global sensitivity analysis (GSA) was performed with Shapley effects and, for the first time in radiation dosimetry, to rank by influence the input parameters of a software conventionally used to estimate organ doses arising from computed tomography (CT) scan exposure: NCICT (National Cancer Institute Dosimetry System for CT) (version 1.0). We focused on brain and red bone marrow (RBM) dose estimation in the French CT cohort and our GSA was performed for three types of examination, classified according to the scanned body region: head, chest, and abdominopelvic. Among the eight uncertain input parameters involved in dose estimation, different influential parameters were highlighted depending on both the scan type and the considered organ dose: these are consistent with the underlying dose calculation methodology. For head CT examinations, technical parameters used for image acquisition including x-ray tube current-time product (mAs) and tube potential (kVp), as well as the end of the scanned body area contributed to about 70% of the variance of the brain dose estimate, while mAs, kVp, the start and end of the scanned body area, and age influenced the RBM dose. The brain and RBM doses delivered during chest CT examinations were mainly influenced by mAs, pitch, and kVp. Finally, kVp was the only input parameter with a significant influence on both the RBM and the brain dose for abdominopelvic CT examinations: it explained more than 30% of the variance of these organ doses. From a clinical perspective, our findings may support optimisation of paediatric CT protocols.

沙普利效应以确定儿童CT扫描后器官剂量估计最具影响力的输入参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书