Multiplexed Aptamer-Based Proteomic Data Normalization (Adaptive Normalization by Maximum Likelihood) Significantly Influences Results in Critically Ill Patients.
Ian B Stanaway, Neha A Sathe, F Linzee Mabrey, Elizabeth Kiernan, Mark M Wurfel, Laura E Evans, Eric D Morrell, Pavan K Bhatraju
{"title":"Multiplexed Aptamer-Based Proteomic Data Normalization (Adaptive Normalization by Maximum Likelihood) Significantly Influences Results in Critically Ill Patients.","authors":"Ian B Stanaway, Neha A Sathe, F Linzee Mabrey, Elizabeth Kiernan, Mark M Wurfel, Laura E Evans, Eric D Morrell, Pavan K Bhatraju","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfag159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood-based proteomics are employed in cohorts of patients with critical illness to provide biologic insights and improve diagnosis and risk stratification. Somalogic developed a multiplex aptamer-based platform (Somascan) with thousands of proteins assayed in a single plasma sample. Results are reported in 2 forms: (a) adaptive normalization by maximum likelihood (ANML), which normalizes measurements to a healthy US population and (b) a non-ANML-normalized form. It is unknown how ANML-normalization influences measurements and associations with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We correlated ANML and non-ANML protein quantification with 9 immunoassay biomarkers measured in the same patients' blood samples from the COVID-19 Host Response and Clinical Outcomes (CHROME) cohort. We compared the association of log2 relative fluorescent units (RFUs) with hospital mortality with and without ANML-normalization using adjusted (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]) logistic regression. Results report the odds ratio per doubling of each protein's RFU and declared significance at a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 197 patients the average age was 54 years (±16), 51% had COVID-19, 65% were male and hospital mortality was 26%. All biomarkers had equal or higher Pearson correlation between non-ANML-normalization and immunoassay data compared to ANML-normalization. Thousands of proteins changed directionality and significance for risk of mortality based on whether data was ANML-normalized, with 108 of the associations being significant in both, but opposite directionality. The paired Cohen D agreement between beta estimates was moderate (D = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58-0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of critically ill patients, ANML-normalization attenuated correlations with immunoassays and largely changed the distribution and direction of significant mortality-associated proteins compared with non-ANML-normalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfag159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Blood-based proteomics are employed in cohorts of patients with critical illness to provide biologic insights and improve diagnosis and risk stratification. Somalogic developed a multiplex aptamer-based platform (Somascan) with thousands of proteins assayed in a single plasma sample. Results are reported in 2 forms: (a) adaptive normalization by maximum likelihood (ANML), which normalizes measurements to a healthy US population and (b) a non-ANML-normalized form. It is unknown how ANML-normalization influences measurements and associations with outcomes.
Methods: We correlated ANML and non-ANML protein quantification with 9 immunoassay biomarkers measured in the same patients' blood samples from the COVID-19 Host Response and Clinical Outcomes (CHROME) cohort. We compared the association of log2 relative fluorescent units (RFUs) with hospital mortality with and without ANML-normalization using adjusted (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]) logistic regression. Results report the odds ratio per doubling of each protein's RFU and declared significance at a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05.
Results: Among 197 patients the average age was 54 years (±16), 51% had COVID-19, 65% were male and hospital mortality was 26%. All biomarkers had equal or higher Pearson correlation between non-ANML-normalization and immunoassay data compared to ANML-normalization. Thousands of proteins changed directionality and significance for risk of mortality based on whether data was ANML-normalized, with 108 of the associations being significant in both, but opposite directionality. The paired Cohen D agreement between beta estimates was moderate (D = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58-0.64).
Conclusions: In this cohort of critically ill patients, ANML-normalization attenuated correlations with immunoassays and largely changed the distribution and direction of significant mortality-associated proteins compared with non-ANML-normalization.