Multimorbidity, Polypharmacy, and Neighborhood Disadvantage as Determinants of Cognitive Performance in the ARCHES Cohort.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Dagem Gebremichael, Semere Bekena, Ramkrishna K Singh, Alexis I B Walker, Mario Millsap, Christian F Banks, Bisrat Bekele, Yiqi Zhu, Jean-Francois Trani, Ganesh M Babulal
{"title":"Multimorbidity, Polypharmacy, and Neighborhood Disadvantage as Determinants of Cognitive Performance in the ARCHES Cohort.","authors":"Dagem Gebremichael, Semere Bekena, Ramkrishna K Singh, Alexis I B Walker, Mario Millsap, Christian F Banks, Bisrat Bekele, Yiqi Zhu, Jean-Francois Trani, Ganesh M Babulal","doi":"10.1177/07334648261491344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAfrican American adults experience a disproportionate burden of dementia, shaped by structural and clinical factors that remain unclear.ObjectiveTo quantify associations between multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and cognition in the context of neighborhood disadvantage.MethodsThis study is a cross-sectional analysis of 348 African American adults aged 45-92 years (mean 64.3 years; 73.6% female) from the Aging Research Characterizing Health Exposome via Social drivers (ARCHES) cohort. Comorbidity burden was assessed using a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), polypharmacy as ≥5 medications, and neighborhood disadvantage using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Linear regression estimated associations with a Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC). The polypharmacy model included modified CCI as a covariate, and effect modification by ADI was assessed using an interaction term between polypharmacy and ADI.ResultsHigher modified CCI was associated with lower cognitive performance (B = -0.071; 95% CI: -0.130, -0.012). Polypharmacy was not independently associated with cognition after modified CCI adjustment (B = -0.081; β = -0.057; p = 0.257). No significant ADI interaction was found (p = 0.064).</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"7334648261491344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13647303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648261491344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAfrican American adults experience a disproportionate burden of dementia, shaped by structural and clinical factors that remain unclear.ObjectiveTo quantify associations between multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and cognition in the context of neighborhood disadvantage.MethodsThis study is a cross-sectional analysis of 348 African American adults aged 45-92 years (mean 64.3 years; 73.6% female) from the Aging Research Characterizing Health Exposome via Social drivers (ARCHES) cohort. Comorbidity burden was assessed using a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), polypharmacy as ≥5 medications, and neighborhood disadvantage using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Linear regression estimated associations with a Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC). The polypharmacy model included modified CCI as a covariate, and effect modification by ADI was assessed using an interaction term between polypharmacy and ADI.ResultsHigher modified CCI was associated with lower cognitive performance (B = -0.071; 95% CI: -0.130, -0.012). Polypharmacy was not independently associated with cognition after modified CCI adjustment (B = -0.081; β = -0.057; p = 0.257). No significant ADI interaction was found (p = 0.064).

在arch队列中,多病、多药和邻里劣势是认知表现的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书