PAs and medical podcasts: Utilization, perceptions, and impact on practice.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Corrine Miller, Sean Kolhoff, Brenda Quincy
{"title":"PAs and medical podcasts: Utilization, perceptions, and impact on practice.","authors":"Corrine Miller, Sean Kolhoff, Brenda Quincy","doi":"10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine medical podcast utilization among physician associates (PAs), including factors associated with use such as perceived barriers, motivations for engagement, and demographics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey assessing medical podcast use was included as an optional module in the 2025 American Academy of Physician Associates PA Practice Survey during its May and June fielding periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 596 PAs who completed the survey, 359 (60.2%) reported listening to medical podcasts. Male PAs were more likely to listen than female PAs (68.8% vs 58.9%; p < .05). Greater years of clinical experience were associated with decreased likelihood to listen (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97). Cost-related concerns were associated with lower use (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92), though some barriers correlated with increased likelihood to report listening. Respondents identified staying current with medical advances, professional development, and support for clinical decision-making as key benefits of podcast use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings are the first to describe medical podcast engagement within the PA profession, demonstrating that PAs, especially those who are earlier in their careers, commonly use this medium as a tool for professional development. Future research should examine the effects of podcast use on knowledge retention, certification performance, and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48728,"journal":{"name":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine medical podcast utilization among physician associates (PAs), including factors associated with use such as perceived barriers, motivations for engagement, and demographics.

Methods: An anonymous survey assessing medical podcast use was included as an optional module in the 2025 American Academy of Physician Associates PA Practice Survey during its May and June fielding periods.

Results: Of the 596 PAs who completed the survey, 359 (60.2%) reported listening to medical podcasts. Male PAs were more likely to listen than female PAs (68.8% vs 58.9%; p < .05). Greater years of clinical experience were associated with decreased likelihood to listen (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.97). Cost-related concerns were associated with lower use (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92), though some barriers correlated with increased likelihood to report listening. Respondents identified staying current with medical advances, professional development, and support for clinical decision-making as key benefits of podcast use.

Conclusion: These findings are the first to describe medical podcast engagement within the PA profession, demonstrating that PAs, especially those who are earlier in their careers, commonly use this medium as a tool for professional development. Future research should examine the effects of podcast use on knowledge retention, certification performance, and clinical outcomes.

PAs和医学播客:利用、认知和对实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
310
期刊介绍: ​​​JAAPA is the peer-reviewed clinical journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA). Published for more than 25 years, its mission is to support the ongoing education and advancement of physician assistants (PAs) by publishing current information and research on clinical, health policy, and professional issues. Published monthly, JAAPA''s award-winning editorial includes: -Clinical review articles (with AAPA-approved Category I CME in each issue)- Case reports- Clinical departments- Original health services research- Articles on issues of professional interest to PAs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书